Pandemic Increases Interest In Combination Products
The 2020 pandemic affected consumer interest and awareness of financial products in many ways. LIMRA’s consumer sentiment survey showed increased consumer concerns related to financial security and an increased interest in life insurance as COVID-19 made the risk of illness and mortality top of mind for many. Interest in combination life insurance/long-term care products, which are a solution for consumers’ life and long-term care needs, also increased during the pandemic.
In early 2021, 26% of consumers were extremely or very likely to consider a combination product when shopping for life insurance — up from 17% only two years ago. This jumps to 36% of people who are facing high levels of stress as caregivers, either for adult relatives or for children. These consumers recognize better than anyone the value of planning ahead for long-term care needs.
We were surprised to find that interest in these products decreases with age. Millennials are the most likely to consider combination products. This group probably finds the concept of a one-stop solution to life and long-term care needs appealing. They also are less likely to own life insurance, and many in this generation and in Generation X are part of the high caregiving stress group “sandwiched” with young children at home and older relatives who may need care.

The expense of long-term care and the desire for an economical form of coverage are key reasons consumers are interested in combination products. Among respondents who were at least “somewhat” likely to consider these products when shopping for life insurance, 35% cited concerns that long-term care costs would deplete or exceed their savings, and 33% thought combination products would be a more economical use of their current assets.
When asked about the attractiveness of particular features of long-term care coverage, the second-most widely valued feature was the ability to lock in premium rates that will never increase (cited by 41% of respondents).
Above any other feature, consumers valued the ability to choose to receive care either at home or in a facility (43% of respondents). Overall, consumers would prefer to receive care at home, with 31% responding that they would prefer staying at their own, a family member’s or a friend’s home to receive care regardless of the costs or level of care needed. An equal percentage would prefer receiving care at home until transitioning to a facility as needed based on cost or care needs.
Millennials showed the strongest preference for the option of staying in their homes before transitioning to a facility, while baby boomers and Gen X consumers were more likely to prefer exclusively at-home care. Just over 1 in 5 respondents were not sure of their preference, though 25% of Gen X consumers were uncertain. These consumers may have still not yet felt the need to plan for long-term care, and they are just beginning to take on caregiving responsibilities for their parents (something baby boomers may have already experienced).
Even in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic and its severe impact on nursing homes, the majority of consumers preferred in-home care for comfort as opposed to safety concerns. Three out of four people who preferred to receive long-term care at home (exclusively or until transitioning to a facility) agreed “it would be more comfortable,” while only 42% were concerned with the safety of assisted living and skilled nursing facilities. This result reflects some optimism among consumers back in January that long-term care facilities would remain a safe choice in the future. And even so, the comforts of being at home can’t be overvalued.
Austin Tewksbury is associate analyst, product research, for LIMRA. He may be contacted at [email protected].



Tailor A Disability Plan To Your Client’s Needs And Budget
Attitude Is Everything with Robert Miller
Advisor News
- Trump targets ‘retirement gap’ with new executive order
- Younger investors are engaged and advisors must adapt
- Plugging the hidden budget leaks of retirement
- Hagens Berman: Retired First Responders Sue Washington State over Rights to $3.3B Pension Funds Threatened by Lawmakers
- Financially support your adult children without risking your future
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A new opportunity for advisors: Younger indexed annuity buyers
- Most employers support embedding guaranteed lifetime income options into DC Plans
- InspereX Partners with AuguStar Retirement for Strategic Expansion into Annuity Market
- FACC and DOL enter stipulation to dismiss 2020 guidance lawsuit
- Zinnia’s Zahara policy admin system adds FIA chassis to product library
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- SchoolCare ordered to continue covering Dover school employees
- Her husband died. Her fight for his Medicaid coverage continued
- Mayo treated his cancer, but insurance denied coverage, leaving him with $76K in medical bills
- Waterloo woman charged with using dead relative's Social Security payments
- Nashville Attorney, Cody Allison, Invited to Present on Strafford National Panel as ERISA Disability Benefits Expert
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Ann Heiss
- Convertible market dynamics and the portfolio implications for insurers
- Finalists announced for Lincoln's 2026 Best Places to Work
- Investors Heritage Promotes Anna Reynolds to Senior Vice President and General Counsel
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Old Republic International Corporation’s Subsidiaries
More Life Insurance News