Pandemic Increases Interest In Combination Products
The 2020 pandemic affected consumer interest and awareness of financial products in many ways. LIMRA’s consumer sentiment survey showed increased consumer concerns related to financial security and an increased interest in life insurance as COVID-19 made the risk of illness and mortality top of mind for many. Interest in combination life insurance/long-term care products, which are a solution for consumers’ life and long-term care needs, also increased during the pandemic.
In early 2021, 26% of consumers were extremely or very likely to consider a combination product when shopping for life insurance — up from 17% only two years ago. This jumps to 36% of people who are facing high levels of stress as caregivers, either for adult relatives or for children. These consumers recognize better than anyone the value of planning ahead for long-term care needs.
We were surprised to find that interest in these products decreases with age. Millennials are the most likely to consider combination products. This group probably finds the concept of a one-stop solution to life and long-term care needs appealing. They also are less likely to own life insurance, and many in this generation and in Generation X are part of the high caregiving stress group “sandwiched” with young children at home and older relatives who may need care.

The expense of long-term care and the desire for an economical form of coverage are key reasons consumers are interested in combination products. Among respondents who were at least “somewhat” likely to consider these products when shopping for life insurance, 35% cited concerns that long-term care costs would deplete or exceed their savings, and 33% thought combination products would be a more economical use of their current assets.
When asked about the attractiveness of particular features of long-term care coverage, the second-most widely valued feature was the ability to lock in premium rates that will never increase (cited by 41% of respondents).
Above any other feature, consumers valued the ability to choose to receive care either at home or in a facility (43% of respondents). Overall, consumers would prefer to receive care at home, with 31% responding that they would prefer staying at their own, a family member’s or a friend’s home to receive care regardless of the costs or level of care needed. An equal percentage would prefer receiving care at home until transitioning to a facility as needed based on cost or care needs.
Millennials showed the strongest preference for the option of staying in their homes before transitioning to a facility, while baby boomers and Gen X consumers were more likely to prefer exclusively at-home care. Just over 1 in 5 respondents were not sure of their preference, though 25% of Gen X consumers were uncertain. These consumers may have still not yet felt the need to plan for long-term care, and they are just beginning to take on caregiving responsibilities for their parents (something baby boomers may have already experienced).
Even in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic and its severe impact on nursing homes, the majority of consumers preferred in-home care for comfort as opposed to safety concerns. Three out of four people who preferred to receive long-term care at home (exclusively or until transitioning to a facility) agreed “it would be more comfortable,” while only 42% were concerned with the safety of assisted living and skilled nursing facilities. This result reflects some optimism among consumers back in January that long-term care facilities would remain a safe choice in the future. And even so, the comforts of being at home can’t be overvalued.
Austin Tewksbury is associate analyst, product research, for LIMRA. He may be contacted at [email protected].



Tailor A Disability Plan To Your Client’s Needs And Budget
Attitude Is Everything with Robert Miller
Advisor News
- Women say their advisors respect them, but talk down to them
- How PEPs compare with traditional 401(k)s
- Allianz studies why 42% of Americans retire sooner than expected
- Why advisors should be talking about life settlements
- Millennials are ready to bring their advisor to the family table
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- NAIC regulators continue pushing for annuity illustration updates
- Wink: Flat first-quarter annuity sales fall just short of $100B
- 26North Re Agrees to Acquire 100% of Independent Insurance Group
- Matthew Michelini named Athene president, with an eye on annuity growth
- Lincoln Financial Announces Executive Leadership Transitions
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Healthcare system spiraling out of control
- After Iowa Medicaid goes private, abuse rises, wait for services soars
- PA House Finance Committee addresses healthcare access, affordability for working Pennsylvanians
- Report: 60,000 fewer Hoosiers signed up for ACA coverage
- More Hoosiers go uninsured, resulting in higher emergency department usage
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CVS Health Corporation’s Aetna Inc. Subsidiaries
- AM Best Assigns Issue Credit Ratings to The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company’s New Surplus Notes
- Prudential announces more layoffs as insurer continues to restructure
- Pradip Patiath Joins Securian Financial Board of Directors
- Over $107 million in life insurance benefits located for Tennesseans in 2025
More Life Insurance News