New Jersey Supreme Court rules against Ocean casino in COVID business interruption case
The case involved the
The casino sued and defeated an attempt by the insurers to dismiss the case. But that decision was reversed by an appellate court.
The high court agreed to take the case in order to resolve the legal question of what constituted loss or damage.
“Based on the plain terms of the policies, we conclude that in order to show a ‘direct physical loss’ of its property or ‘direct physical . . . damage’ to its property under the policy language at issue, (parent company
“At most, it has alleged that it sustained a loss of business during the COVID-19 government-mandated suspension of business operations because it was not permitted to use its property as it would otherwise have done,” the opinion read.
It concluded that the casino's pleadings “do not support a finding that it is entitled to insurance coverage.”
The casino declined comment Wednesday.
The ruling is similar to others reached in state and federal courts around the country, including cases where payouts were denied involving a chain of
During arguments in September before the Supreme Court,
But
Ocean maintained that in addition to an order by Democratic Gov.
___
Follow
Best’s Review: World’s Largest Insurance Companies, Top 50 Global Reinsurers and More
Down the Decades
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News