Washington, D.C. – The National Association of Health Underwriters (NAHU) issued the following statement today in response to the Administration’s decision to end funding for cost sharing reductions (CSR) – a key provision in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). CSRs are a critical consumer protection that reduces deductibles and copayments for individuals with lower incomes who qualify for a premium tax credit under the law.
“Lower income individuals are often unable to afford high deductibles and copayments for their health care and may forego needed care as a result of the cost,” explained NAHU CEO Janet Trautwein. “CSR payments from the federal government reimburse carriers for lowering costs for doctor visits and prescription drugs for patients that qualify for the program. Without reimbursement for the additional benefits provided to these individuals, insurance carriers will have no choice but to increase premiums to offset the unreimbursed expenses, pricing some people out of coverage.
“Doing away with this critical program will further deteriorate an already unstable individual market and hurt consumers who depend on these programs to make their health care affordable, leading to fewer choices, less access and even higher premiums.
“Many health insurance carriers have already left the individual market, and far too many counties only have one carrier remaining. Funding these payments will go a long way toward stabilizing the individual markets while members of Congress debate ACA reform efforts.
“Additional legislative action will be necessary to fully stabilize the individual market but continuing CSR payments will be a step in the right direction. We look forward to working with members of Congress and the Administration on this and other bipartisan efforts to make health care more affordable and accessible to all Americans.”
Key senators say they have outline of health insurance deal
Mgaero Welcomes Alex Tsetsenekos as Head of Business Development
Advisor News
- Benefit Costs Squeeze Schools, Driving Cuts, Tax Hikes And Difficult Tradeoffs
- Why client insurance needs could change even if their life doesn’t
- Most Gen Z investors think less than a year ahead when making financial decisions
- IRI pitches retirement agenda to Jeffries as democrats shape affordability platform
- Help child-free clients plan for their later years
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Guidance, bulletin or reg? NAIC debates form of annuity illustration update
- Nationwide adds mutual fund-linked strategy to New Heights Select FIA
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
More Annuity NewsLife Insurance News
Property and Casualty News
- What California's insurance commissioner does — and how it affects your wallet
- Fact Check: Where candidates Donalds and Jolly stand on property insurance
- AM Best Revises Outlooks to Negative for Kemper Corporation, Its Affiliates and Subsidiaries
- AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to USAA Falcon Property & Casualty Insurance Company
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Erie Insurance Group’s Members and Erie Family Life Insurance Company
More Property and Casualty News