KMA: Ten second or less — health insurers use prior authorizations to delay, deny care; reform is needed
Count to ten.
That's how long at least one health insurer believes it takes to review whether you need a test, medication or other health care service.
Modern-day life is hectic and being sick or suffering from a chronic condition like asthma or diabetes only adds to the burdens we all face. Those burdens are only compounded when your treatment is hampered by the dreaded need for "prior authorization" or other review from your insurer before they agree to pay for it. Even if the treatment is eventually approved, the prior authorization process itself creates hardships for people at a time when they least need them.
Unfortunately, as medicine has modernized, health insurers use technology to deny care at astounding rates. One needs to look no further than a recent ProPublica article that highlights how Cigna does it. The company uses a computer program that "flags" mismatches between what a patient's physician diagnoses versus what the company considers acceptable tests and procedures for those ailments. Once "flagged," claims are supposed to be reviewed. According to the article, this so-called review was, to say the least, very brief.
One reviewer highlighted in the article rejected 121,000 claims in the first two months of 2022. Rejected – not reviewed. Assuming this reviewer worked a normal eight-hour workday, five days a week, during those two months, the reviewer worked 328 hours during that time. 121,000 claims rejected over the span of 328 hours is the equivalent of rejecting 368 claims per hour, which amounts to 6.13 claims rejected every minute, making the rejection rate one every ten seconds. That's without accounting for breaks, holidays or any claims the reviewer did not reject. One former Cigna executive described this process as "a system built to deny claims." No kidding.
Insurance companies' prior authorization practices require patients and physicians to spend countless hours submitting and resubmitting paperwork, medical charts, and waiting on hold just to get a much-needed medication, test or procedure approved by the insurance company. A survey of
One way to reform this system is to bypass it altogether.
Legislation taken up during the 2023
This makes sense, not only for the patient and the physician, but the health insurers as well.
Why go through the trouble of setting up and operating such systems in situations where they are not needed?
KMA will continue to engage lawmakers over the coming year regarding the need for this common-sense approach so that the
Reform is needed to rein in insurers whose first instinct is to deny care. How much is it needed?
Count to ten.


Shareholdings of Zurich Insurance Group Ltd along with its subsidiaries in own shares has fallen below the threshold of 3%
Medical Professional Liability Insurance Market 2031 : Medical professional liability decreases risks for doctors
Advisor News
- When new investment trends emerge, Gen Z is most likely generation to be first in
- Could ‘plain English’ become an advisor’s secret weapon?
- IRI urges Senate action on 403(b) parity legislation
- Three estate planning ideas to protect your clients and their wealth
- What advisors must know about accessible client documents
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
- Wink: Annuity sales post strong Q2, led by MYGAs and structured products
- Legacy Marketing Group partners with Malibu Life USA for annuity launch
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News