Factsheet January 2025
Factsheet
Marketing document
Investment focus
factors into consideration while implementing the aforementioned investment
Indexed performance since launch
Cumulative & annualised performance
|
Cumulative |
Annualised |
objectives.
Fund facts
|
Share price |
147.20 |
|
Net Asset Value (NAV) |
157.97 |
|
Market capitalisation |
|
Investment manager
|
Administrator |
|
|
Launch date |
|
|
Fiscal year end |
|
|
Benchmark (BM) |
|
|
1M |
YTD |
1Y |
3Y |
5Y |
10Y |
ITD |
|
|
Share |
3.8% |
3.8% |
1.2% |
-1.2% |
21.8% |
n.a. |
89.6% |
|
NAV |
5.9% |
5.9% |
3.9% |
1.2% |
34.4% |
n.a. |
102.8% |
|
BM |
7.0% |
7.0% |
7.0% |
23.0% |
54.4% |
n.a. |
125.1% |
Annual performance
|
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
YTD |
|
|
Share |
29.1% |
16.6% |
-21.0% |
7.0% |
-6.5% |
3.8% |
|
NAV |
25.7% |
15.2% |
-11.1% |
2.4% |
-6.7% |
5.9% |
|
BM |
10.3% |
20.8% |
5.8% |
-1.6% |
3.1% |
7.0% |
|
1Y |
3Y |
5Y |
10Y |
ITD |
|
1.2% |
-0.4% |
4.0% |
n.a. |
8.1% |
|
3.9% |
0.4% |
6.1% |
n.a. |
9.0% |
|
7.0% |
7.1% |
9.1% |
n.a. |
10.4% |
|
ISIN code |
GB00BZCNLL95 |
|
Bloomberg |
BBH LN Equity |
|
Number of ordinary shares |
247,289,903 |
|
Management fee |
0.95% |
|
Performance fee |
none |
|
Min. investment |
n.a. |
|
Legal entity |
|
|
EU SFDR 2019/2088 |
Article 8 |
Key figures
|
Beta |
1.39 |
|
Correlation |
0.64 |
|
Volatility |
28.4% |
|
Tracking Error |
22.33 |
|
Active Share |
79.47 |
|
|
0.04 |
|
Information Ratio |
-0.15 |
|
Jensen's Alpha |
-5.52 |
Source:
Rolling 12-month-performance
|
|
|
Source:
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results and can be misleading. Changes in the rate of exchange may have an adverse effect on prices and incomes. All performance figures reflect the reinvestment of dividends and do not take into account the commissions and costs incurred on the issue and redemption of shares, if any. The reference benchmark is used for performance comparison purposes only (dividend reinvested). No benchmark is directly identical to the fund, thus the performance of a benchmark is not a reliable indicator of future performance of the
Welcome to our first update of 2025. Life under Trump 2.0 is proving to be as fast paced and uncertain as anyone could have reasonably imagined. The first salvos of a global trade war have been unleashed, and then partially retracted. Where we go from here is anyone's guess. Is this the trade equivalent of gunboat diplomacy, Trump showing his actually a weak paper tiger or a retuto 1930s economic orthodoxy? (We all know how the latter went).
The impact of all of this on the healthcare sector is yet to be determined; supply chains are often longer and more complex than anyone realised before trying to unwind them. Yet, at the same time, there is a cogent argument for excluding such products of necessity (there again, food is quite essential, and it has not been excluded as yet). Even so, Trump has made specific comments about pharmaceutical production needing to 'come home'.
Whatever form they take, the economic impact of tariffs is bound to be negative overall; they are the antithesis of free trade. Prices will rise and discretionary demand will likely fall at the margin, as more goes toward food and financing costs. Defensive sectors may well offer a safe port in this storm, although healthcare must contend with inevitable changes to entitlement programmes like Medicaid and potentially RFK Jr too.
Monthly review
The Trust
During January, the Trust's Net Asset Value rose 5.3% in US dollar terms (+5.9% in sterling) to 157.97p, underperforming the total retuof the
|
start of |
107 |
|
105 |
|
|
100 at |
|
|
(reabsed to month) |
103 |
|
101 |
|
|
Performance |
99 |
|
97 |
|
31 Dez |
07 Jan |
14 Jan |
21 Jan |
28 Jan |
|
|
BBH (NAV, $) |
|
Russell 2000 HC Index ($) |
|||
Source:
Size factor was not an appreciable issue during the month. However, Figure 1 highlights the elevated volatility mid-month, where the sector gave back all of its progress during the marquee JPM Healthcare conference and then bounced again post the inauguration.
Within the portfolio, Medical Technology was the largest contributing sub-sector by far, followed by Focused Therapeutics and Diagnostics. Services and Healthcare IT delivered negative returns over the month. The portfolio remained at 34 active positions, with one addition in Medical Technology, and one exit in Focused Therapeutics.
The evolution of the sub-sector weightings is summarised in Figure 2 opposite, and we would make the following comments:
Given rising political uncertainties over the funding for the Medicaid programme, we significantly reduced our exposure to stocks with a high level of dependency on this market. This is most obvious in the reduction in weighting of Healthcare IT.
At the beginning of the month, we held a substantial position in the surgical robotics company
The increase in the Diagnostics weightings mostly reflects positive relative performance. We actively added to our holdings in Distributors and reduced our holdings in Focused Therapeutics. We bought back some of our Managed Care exposure following recent weakness and added materially to our Tools exposure.
|
Subsectors |
Subsectors |
Change |
||||||
|
end |
end |
|||||||
|
Diagnostics |
17.3% |
17.9% |
Increased |
|||||
|
Distributors |
1.6% |
2.1% |
Increased |
|||||
|
Focused |
27.5% |
23.7% |
Decreased |
|||||
|
Therapeutics |
||||||||
|
Healthcare IT |
2.1% |
0.9% |
Decreased |
|||||
|
Healthcare |
11.4% |
13.4% |
Increased |
|||||
|
Technology |
||||||||
|
Managed Care |
4.1% |
5.7% |
Increased |
|||||
|
Med-Tech |
20.1% |
17.8% |
Decreased |
|||||
|
Services |
9.7% |
10.0% |
Increased |
|||||
|
Tools |
6.2% |
8.5% |
Increased |
|||||
100.0% 100.0%
Source:
The share buyback programme was very active again during the month, and ~9.3m shares were repurchased. The share buyback parameters are set by Trust's board and the programme is operated on an 'arms length' basis by the Company's broker,
Following these portfolio changes and share repurchases, the cash balance increased slightly from 3.3% of gross assets to 4.0%. In January, the average share price discount to NAV declined further to 6.1%, as compared to 8.1% during
The Healthcare Sector
As noted previously, the dollar total retuof the
The sector was generally tracking the upward trend in the broader market until the 'DeepSeek AI' reveal over the weekend preceding the 27th January trading session, during which we saw a major sell-off in AI- linked technology stocks.
Healthcare seemed to be a safe haven as investors moved away from what has been a multi-year cycle of over-weighting a narrow group of mega-cap tech stocks on the expectation that they have some sort of unassailable technological advantage. These assumptions have looked questionable to us for some time, but the
|
start of |
108 |
|
|
106 |
||
|
100 at |
||
|
(rebasedto |
month) |
104 |
|
102 |
||
|
Performance |
||
|
100 |
||
|
98 |
|
31 Dez |
07 Jan |
14 Jan |
21 Jan |
28 Jan |
|
|
|
|||
Source:
January is always a busy month, with the marquee JP Morgan Healthcare conference delivering its usual slew of pre-announcements, 2025 guidance statements, strategic updates and C-Suite musings on the outlook for the coming 12 months.
At the same time, we have had to contend with a series of announcements from team Trump, both before and after the inauguration on 20th January. This led to increased levels of volatility across the month. The Index's sub-sector performance breakdown is summarised in Figure 4 below:
|
Weighting |
Perf (USD) |
Perf (GBP) |
|
|
Healthcare IT |
0.6% |
10.6% |
11.2% |
|
Conglomerate |
9.0% |
10.0% |
10.6% |
|
Healthcare Technology |
0.7% |
9.8% |
10.4% |
|
Dental |
0.4% |
9.3% |
10.0% |
|
Facilities |
1.0% |
8.6% |
9.2% |
|
Tools |
7.3% |
8.1% |
8.7% |
|
Med-Tech |
17.3% |
7.7% |
8.3% |
|
Other HC |
1.3% |
7.6% |
8.2% |
|
Distributors |
2.1% |
7.5% |
8.0% |
|
Managed Care |
9.8% |
7.4% |
8.0% |
|
Services |
2.0% |
5.2% |
5.8% |
|
Diversified Therapeutics |
40.1% |
4.6% |
5.2% |
|
Diagnostics |
1.3% |
4.4% |
4.9% |
|
Focused Therapeutics |
7.8% |
4.4% |
4.9% |
|
Generics |
0.8% |
-4.4% |
-3.8% |
|
Index perf |
6.4% |
7.0% |
Source: Bloomberg/
We would offer the following observations on the performance dispersion:
The lagging performance of the pharma/biotech stocks (Diversified and Focused Therapeutics) was notable and to our minds reflected two things; drug pricing being on the thematic agenda for the incoming administration (no surprise) and, more bizarrely to our minds, apparent disappointment at a lack of therapeutics M&A being announced at the JPM event.
As we have noted several times in past missives, the
As such, expecting an immediate increase in public M&A seems rash to us. It is interesting to see that large caps suffered as well as the 'usual'
biotech target stocks; it just goes to show how depressed sentiment is to some of the larger companies due to their thin pipelines.
In a reprise of the December reversal and elevated volatility themes described previously, it was Teva giving back a majority of last month's outsized gain that drove the generics sub-sector to the bottom of the pile. Excluding Teva's fall, this sub-sector would still be toward the bottom, but in mid-single digit positive territory.
The political and regulatory outlook for US healthcare
Tariffs remain at the forefront of investor's minds and it is clear that Trump is serious about using them to get concessions from trading partners, friend and foe alike. At this point, it seems prudent to assume this threat will come and go. The more they prove effective to leverage other goals (e.g. firming up the Southeborder, the more likely Trump will be to raise the threat of imposition.
Beyond these tariff threats, the new administration could well impact the healthcare sector more directly. So what have we learnt or concluded thus far regarding the regulatory and political outlook for healthcare in the US over the coming four years? The simple answer is
- nothing is definitive as yet, but some clarity is beginning to emerge.
As described previously, we expect to see more M&A activity in the fullness of time.
As we go to press, the
As we have noted before, we think he will be a more moderate figure in a position of authority than he was on the campaign trail, where more extreme views garner more press and voter engagement. This is an important point to be kept in mind when reflecting on Trump's prognostications. He has prior form for failing to follow through, or moderating his views; look how quickly he rolled back the tariffs for
Moreover, we still think his personal crusades are far more about food than healthcare per se, and he is not wrong to argue that the US is suffering an epidemic of chronic morbidity and mortality that is eminently preventable.
If his appointment is confirmed, it will take some months for the market to figure out what he will focus on, but we think this uncertainty is largely priced in already.
Beyond RFK, the other major issue is around the 'DOGE' cost-cutting effort. The Trump/Musk cost-cutting axe seems very likely to fall on Medicaid. This welfare programme is state-administered but majority federally funded.
It's importance cannot be overstated: Medicaid is the single-largest health insurance program in
The current funding mechanism is complex and somewhat unpredictable, in the sense that it has capitation and disease burden elements, so as eligibility or acuity rises and falls (e.g. during the pandemic), so do the Federal payments. Undoubtedly, Medicaid spending has risen hugely through the pandemic years and has inflected to a much higher rate of growth than previously, none of which was expected or planned for.
The nexus of the current Trump/Musk proposals seem to be a simplification of Federal payments to a block grant (which already operates in the US dependency of
However, most states cannot run any sort of a deficit, so a foreseen increase in spending would require higher state taxes to offset. Raising taxes will be anathema in some Republican states.
Whilst the uncertainty around this continues, we think it makes sense to limit direct exposure to it and also to facilities operators who may face higher levels of uncompensated care. Reduced coverage and/or higher eligibility criteria (as has occurred in
Greater cost pressures may accelerate the already underway transition of Medicare systems to a value-based care approach, which has already proven to be more cost effective than fee-for service approaches.
Given that the situation remains fluid, our approach will continue to be to try and avoid material exposures to areas of known uncertainty with downside risk. In the meanwhile, all we can to is follow the progress of Trump's merry dance, one that does not follow any conventional rhythms.
We always appreciate the opportunity to interact with our investors directly and you can submit questions regarding the Trust at any time via:
As ever, we will endeavour to respond in a timely fashion and we thank you for your continued support during these volatile months.
Top 10 positions
Total top 10 positions
Total positions
Sector breakdown
Focused Therapeutics
Diagnostics
Med-Tech
Health Tech
Services
Tools
Managed Care
Distributors
Healthcare IT
Geographic breakdown
Market cap breakdown
Small-Cap
Mid-Cap
Large-Cap
Mega-Cap
|
Benefits |
Inherent risks |
|||||||
|
7.3% |
• Healthcare has a strong, fundamental |
• The fund actively invests in equities. |
||||||
|
6.5% |
demographic-driven growth outlook. |
Equities are subject to strong price |
||||||
|
• The fund has a global and unconstrained |
fluctuations and so are also exposed to the |
|||||||
|
5.7% |
||||||||
|
investment remit. |
risk of price losses. |
|||||||
|
5.4% |
||||||||
|
• It is a concentrated high conviction |
• Healthcare equities can be subject to |
|||||||
|
4.8% |
portfolio. |
sudden substantial price movements |
||||||
|
4.2% |
• The fund offers a combination of high |
owning to market, sector or company |
||||||
|
3.7% |
quality healthcare exposure and a |
factors. |
||||||
|
targeted 3.5% dividend yield. |
• The fund invests in foreign currencies, |
|||||||
|
3.7% |
||||||||
|
• |
which means a corresponding degree of |
|||||||
|
3.5% |
board of directors and relies on the |
currency risk against the reference |
||||||
|
3.4% |
experienced management team of |
currency. |
||||||
|
48.1% |
|
• The price investors pay or receive, like |
||||||
|
other listed shares, is determined by |
||||||||
|
34 |
||||||||
|
supply and demand and may be at a |
||||||||
|
discount or premium to the underlying net |
||||||||
|
asset value of the Company. |
||||||||
|
23.7% |
• The fund may take a leverage, which may |
|||||||
|
lead to even higher price movements |
||||||||
|
17.9% |
compared to the underlying market. |
|||||||
|
17.8% |
You can find a detailed presentation of the risks faced by this fund in the "Risk factors" section of the sales prospectus. |
|||||||
|
13.4% |
||||||||
|
10.0% |
Management Team |
|||||||
|
8.5% |
||||||||
|
5.7% |
||||||||
|
2.1% |
||||||||
|
0.9% |
||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
99.7% |
Co-Portfolio Manager |
Co-Portfolio Manager |
||||||
|
0.3% |
||||||||
|
Sustainability Profile - ESG |
||||||||
|
23.5% |
EU SFDR 2019/2088 product category: |
Article 8 |
||||||
|
19.8% |
||||||||
|
36.4% |
Exclusions: |
ESG Risk Analysis: |
Stewardship: |
|||||
|
20.3% |
Compliance UNGC, HR, ILO |
ESG-Integration |
Engagement |
|||||
|
Norms-based exclusions |
Proxy Voting |
|||||||
|
Controversial weapons |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
CO2-intensity (t CO2/mn USD sales): |
21.2 (Low) |
Coverage: |
94% |
|||||
|
|
A |
Coverage: |
94% |
Source:
Due to rounding, figures may not add up to 100.0%. Figures are shown as a percentage of gross assets.
For illustrative purposes only. Holdings and allocations are subject to change. Any reference to a specific company or security does not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or directly invest in the company or securities. Where the fund is denominated in a currency other than an investor's base currency, changes in the rate of exchange may have an adverse effect on price and income.
Market Cap Breakdown defined as: Mega Cap >
Based on portfolio data as per 31.01.2025; - ESG data base on
Risk RetuProfile acc. to SRI
This product should form part of an investor's overall portfolio. It will be managed with a view to the holding period being not less than three years given the volatility and investment returns that are not correlated to the wider healthcare sector and so may not be suitable for investors unwilling to tolerate higher levels of volatility or uncorrelated returns.
|
low risk |
high risk |
|||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
We have rated this product as risk class 6 on a scale of 1 to 7, with 6 being the second highest risk class. The risk of potential losses from future performance is considered high. In the event of very adverse market conditions, it is very likely that the ability to execute your redemption request will be impaired. The calculation of the risk and earnings profile is based on simulated/historical data, which cannot be used as a reliable indication of the future risk profile. The classification of the fund may change in future and does not constitute a guarantee. Even a fund classed in category 1 does not constitute
- completely risk-free investment. There can be no guarantee that a retuwill be achieved or that a substantial loss of capital will not be incurred. The overall risk exposure may have a strong impact on any retuachieved by the fund or subfund. For further information please refer to the fund prospectus or PRIIP-KID.
Liquidity risk
The fund may invest some of its assets in financial instruments that may in certain circumstances reach a relatively low level of liquidity, which can have an impact on the fund's liquidity.
Risk arising from the use of derivatives
The fund may conclude derivatives transactions. This increases opportunities, but also involves an increased risk of loss.
Currency risks
The fund may invest in assets denominated in a foreign currency. Changes in the rate of exchange may have an adverse effect on prices and incomes.
Operational risks and custody risks
The fund is subject to risks due to operational or human errors, which can arise at the investment company, the custodian bank, a custodian or other third parties.
Target market
The fund is available for retail and professional investors in the
Objective
The
Important information
This document is only made available to professional clients and eligible counterparties as defined by the
© 2025MSCI
The most important terms are explained in the glossary at
Copyright © 2025 Bellevue Asset Management AG.
Attachments
Disclaimer



SecurityScorecard Report: 59% of Breaches Impacting Insurance Sector Caused by Third-Party Attack Vectors
UK central bank cuts interest rates as economy slumps, Trump threat looms
Advisor News
- Trump bets his tax cuts will please Las Vegas voters on his swing West
- Lifetime income is the missing link to global retirement security
- Don’t let caregiving derail your clients’ retirement
- The ‘magic number’ for retirement hits $1.45M
- OBBBA can give small-business clients opportunities for saving
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Human connection still key in the new annuity era
- Lifetime income is the missing link to global retirement security
- ‘All-weather’ annuity portfolios aim to sharply limit rainy days
- Annuity income: The new 401(k) standard?
- Smart annuity planning can benefit long-term tax planning
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Trump admin seeks health-care price transparency
- OID approved in effort to make health coverage more affordable
- MEDICAID COST-SHARING COVERAGE VETO SUSTAINED
- MEDICAID COST-SHARING COVERAGE APPROVED
- DeSantis administration gets pushback for its child health policies
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AI and life insurance: Fast today, unpredictable tomorrow
- Judge allows PHL policyholders to intervene, denies ‘premium holiday’
- eHealth expands into final expense insurance
- CID hosts info session for PHL Variable policyholders
- ‘Seismic changes’ cloud global economy, analyst says
More Life Insurance News