Sources Sought Notice – RFI – Processing of Veteran’s Administration Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies No-Pay Claims to Produce Medicare-Equivalent Electronic Remittance Advice Notices
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Sources Sought Notice -
Notice Type: Sources Sought Notice
Posted Date:
Office Address:
Subject:
Classification Code: Q - Medical services
Solicitation Number: RFI-CMS-2014-VA
Contact:
Description:
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENT THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
The
CMS requests responses to this
In order for CMS to consider a response, the white paper shall consist of three sections and provide the information described below. CMS will not consider additional information submitted beyond these three sections.
Section I. Name, mailing address, phone number, fax number, and email of designated point of contact.
Section II. The name and contact information for the business or other organization whose views are represented in the paper, if that contact information differs from that provided in Section I.
Section III (NO MORE THAN 10 PAGES). Complete and considered responses to each of the questions listed below for exactly two of the most preferred options OR for exactly the one most preferred option below and an alternate framework.
BACKGROUND: Use of a
Public Law 101-508 expanded the VA authority to include recovery from third party payers for the cost of medical care provided to veterans treated for non-service connected conditions. Court rulings have determined that secondary insurance carriers are subject to these public laws and must reimburse the VA as if the care had been furnished in the private sector. In order to accomplish this, CMS and the VA have entered into an agreement whereby CMS adjudicates VA claims on a "no-pay" basis and generates
The VA established a process with one of the Medicare Contractors to provide the VA with MRAs reflecting the deductible and coinsurance amounts due from secondary payers.
This
QUESTIONS: This RFI seeks comment from members of the public about how CMS can best organize and assign the VA MRA project work. The feedback from this
Responders should review Appendix A of this notice for information about the three proposed implementation options currently under consideration.
CMS asks that each respondent address each of the following questions as it pertains to each of the two most preferred options OR for exactly the one most preferred option for organizing VA MRA project work:
1. Which of the options outlined in Appendix A do you believe best positions the VA MRA project collectively to deliver maximum value to the VA for the processing of VA DME claims (Respondents are asked to choose and respond to two of the most preferred approaches from among the three approaches in Appendix A or its one most preferred approach and to propose one alternate method of implementation.)
2. What advantages would be realized by adopting the option(s) you articulated in your response to Question 1 Provide the pros and cons for each option (or alternative).
3. How could CMS improve each of the two options selected from Appendix A to be sure that it delivers the most impact to the VA and their goal
4. What are some important factors for CMS to consider if the Agency were to adopt each of the chosen approaches (including any alternative approaches you suggest in your response) in organizing VA MRA project work this way What else should CMS think about as it makes its VA MRA project framework decision
SPECIAL NOTE TO RESPONDENTS: Respondents are asked to draw their responses from objective, empirical, and actionable evidence and to cite this evidence within their responses. CMS will draw upon the quality of responses in designing the future direction of the VA MRA project.
ONCE AGAIN THIS IS A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ONLY. This
Please note that CMS will not respond to questions about the policy issues raised in this
CMS may or may not choose to contact individual responders. Such communications would only serve to clarify written responses further.
The information provided in the
Link/URL: https://www.fbo.gov/spg/HHS/HCFA/AGG/RFI-CMS-2014-VA/listing.html
| Copyright: | (c) 2013 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1324 |



Presolicitation Notice – C– Construct Cancer Treatment Center
Combine Solicitation – Ophthalmology Clinics for the Lawton Indian Hospital
Advisor News
- Retirement optimism climbs, but emotion-driven investing threatens growth
- US economy to ride tax cut tailwind but faces risks
- Investor use of online brokerage accounts, new investment techniques rises
- How 831(b) plans can protect your practice from unexpected, uninsured costs
- Does a $1M make you rich? Many millionaires today don’t think so
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Judge denies new trial for Jeffrey Cutter on Advisors Act violation
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company Trademark Application for “EMPOWER BENEFIT CONSULTING SERVICES” Filed: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- 2025 Top 5 Annuity Stories: Lawsuits, layoffs and Brighthouse sale rumors
- An Application for the Trademark “DYNAMIC RETIREMENT MANAGER” Has Been Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Product understanding will drive the future of insurance
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- To attract Gen Z, insurance must rewrite its story
- Baby On Board
- 2025 Top 5 Life Insurance Stories: IUL takes center stage as lawsuits pile up
- Private placement securities continue to be attractive to insurers
- Inszone Insurance Services Expands Benefits Department in Michigan with Acquisition of Voyage Benefits, LLC
More Life Insurance News