Why New York needs to rethink its single-payer agenda - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
September 1, 2018 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Why New York needs to rethink its single-payer agenda

Westchester County Business Journal (NY)

If you thought the debate about health care was limited to the U.S. Congress and Washington, D.C., think again. As the dispute over public-versus-private rages on, state legislatures are proposing their own bills - and New York is no exception. The Empire State's policymakers have the ability to enact changes that would have a deep and swift impact across the state and here in Westchester, from Yonkers to White Plains to Peekskill.

The latest push for single-payer health care here in New York is titled, simply, the New York Health Act. It's hardly a new idea: the proposed legislation has successfully passed the state's Democrat-majority assembly for multiple years. But the bill hasn't found enough support in the Senate. And so, this past June, once again, the bill failed to move forward.

This is good news for both Westchester employers and employees. Of course, the idea of making health care more accessible and affordable for all is laudable. But the New York Health Act - like many similar bills in other states - is far from perfect. And if passed as-is, we in the Hudson Valley would quickly feel our pocketbooks become far lighter, with no discernable improvement to our medical care. Here's why.

Firstly, a single-payer model doesn't address the biggest, thorniest issue of all: delivering health care here in New York - and Westchester specifically - is expensive. The inefficiencies inherent in the current system, where emphasis is put on volume, as opposed to value, leads to the high cost of health care and, subsequently, high health insurance rates. Shifting the bill to taxpayers won't solve this issue. What's really needed is reform across the health care industry: better preventative care, more education and value-based insurance design.

Speaking of taxpayers: Were the New York Health Act to move forward, Westchester residents would suddenly see an alarmingly steep tax hike. Indeed, research shows that the cost to transition into a single-payer system would require extraordinary funding - as in, tens of billions more annually. According to a recently reported analysis from the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, the single-payer health plan would result in a $226 billion tax hike.

Westchester County has the second-highest per capita income of all New York counties - just over $70,000, according to census data. (New York City has the highest, at $111,000, and third and fourth are Nassau and Putnam, respectively.) And so, as a result, Westchester residents would be responsible for a big chunk of that hefty tax increase.

Another problem? The New York Health Act would radically reshape and diminish a whole slate of industries - many of which call Westchester home. Everything from our hospitals and palliative care facilities to our FIRE (finance, insurance and real estate) businesses would experience a sea change. And as many of these businesses shrink or leave the state, those who remain take on an even bigger tax burden. Westchester could see a major talent and revenue drain as businesses and professionals migrate across state borders to competing metro areas like Stamford or Paramus, New Jersey.

It's clear that the New York Health Act - however noble its intentions - would disrupt Westchester's residents and businesses more than benefit them. The cost - in actual dollars, but also intellectual capital - is simply too high. Indeed, Westchester residents need only to look at other states where similar proposals fell flat, like our neighbor to the northeast, Vermont. Instead, our lawmakers would be wise to pursue a different route: rather than shifting the high costs of health care from the private sector to the taxpayers, they should seek to simply bring down the costs. We believe that the integration of existing public plans with market-based solutions is the most economically effective and responsible means of making affordable and quality health care accessible to everyone. Let's change how we deliver health care (more preventative care, and an investment in quality) to make Westchester residents - and all New Yorkers - healthier.

James D. Schützer is vice president ofJDM Benefits (jdmbenefits.com) in White Plains. He can be reached at 914-644-9232.

Older

Insurers should care about the opioid crisis

Newer

Separating Hype from Reality

Advisor News

  • After the midterms: Addressing your clients’ tax concerns
  • Berkeley arts tax heads toward passage while public bank measure looks likely to fail
  • Americans’ sense of overall prosperity still ticks upward
  • Turning expanded eligibility into a better coverage plan for federal clients
  • Election 2026: Which of Berkeley's 7 ballot measures will pass?
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Knighthead Annuity & Life Assurance Company and Merit Life Insurance Co.
  • Jackson reports record annuity sales, increases share repurchase authorization
  • Why the market doesn’t need more carriers
  • Equitable, Corebridge steam toward merger with strong Q3 annuity sales
  • Jackson Announces New Annuity Offering for AARP Members
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Insurance program's collapse detailed at ISBA conference
  • Boeing retirees ‘shocked’ by 400% jump in health insurance premiums
  • MEDICAID PAYMENT TRANSPARENCY RULES: STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS
  • Medicare open enrollment continues through Dec. 7
  • Pike County facing year-end employee healthcare lapse
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha and Its Subsidiary
  • National Life Group Approves $23 Million Dividends for 2027
  • Milliman’s proposed $15.5 million settlement puts life insurance underwriting data in focus
  • Brighthouse Financial Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results
  • Prudential earnings dip as Japan sales suspension offsets U.S. growth
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Press Releases

  • Insurvoice Lets Independent Insurance Agency Owners Analyze Every Customer Call in ChatGPT or Claude
  • Spectrum Weather & Specialty Insurance Celebrates 15 Years and Welcomes the Next Generation
  • Royal Neighbors of America® Increases Service Capacity
  • Benefits Studio Launches to Fill the Missing Middle of Benefits Navigation at $49/mo
  • Lauren Sinnott Named to Ragan’s Top Women in Marketing Awards, Class of 2026 
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.