Sens. Murray, Cantwell Ask DOJ to Uphold Existing Policy on State Marijuana Laws
Today, a bipartisan group of
The letter was prompted by
"It is essential that states that have implemented any type of practical, effective marijuana policy receive immediate assurance from the DOJ that it will respect the ability of states to enforce thoughtful, sensible drug policies in ways that do not threaten the public's health and safety," the senators wrote. "This ensures that state infrastructure, including tax revenue, small businesses, and jobs, can be protected; DOJ resources can be used most effectively; and most importantly, that marijuana can be properly regulated to improve public health and safety."
The federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which is still on the books, outlaws the possession, cultivation, and distribution of marijuana except for authorized research. However, guidance issued by the DOJ in 2013 by the Obama administration, known as the "Cole Memorandum," provides a clear direction on the interaction of state and federal laws regarding marijuana use. According to the memorandum, enforcement of marijuana-related activities should be addressed primarily by state regulatory bodies and local law enforcement in states with "strong and effective regulatory systems" already in place. It is unclear whether the Trump administration will leave this guidance in place.
To date, eight states (
The letter was also signed by Senators
The full letter is below.
The Honorable
Attorney General
Dear Attorney General Sessions:
We write to express our concern regarding recent remarks by
In 2013, the DOJ issued a memorandum outlining federal marijuana enforcement priorities in light of state marijuana laws (the "Cole Memorandum"). The Cole Memorandum explains that where states have "strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems to control the cultivation, distribution, sale, and production of marijuana, . . . enforcement of state law by state and local law enforcement and regulatory bodies should remain the primary means of addressing marijuana-related activity." This guidance has provided clarity to states and Americans on the interaction of state and federal laws regarding marijuana use and has allowed the DOJ to focus its law enforcement resources on the greatest threats to public safety and criminal justice, while allowing states to implement marijuana laws as they deem appropriate.
On the campaign trail, then-candidate Trump stated that despite his personal views regarding marijuana use, legalization should be left to the states. Last week
It is essential that states that have implemented any type of practical, effective marijuana policy receive immediate assurance from the DOJ that it will respect the ability of states to enforce thoughtful, sensible drug policies in ways that do not threaten the public's health and safety. This ensures that state infrastructure, including tax revenue, small businesses, and jobs, can be protected; DOJ resources can be used most effectively; and most importantly, that marijuana can be properly regulated to improve public health and safety. We hope that you solicit input from state and local officials to learn about their ongoing efforts and gain their perspectives on this matter. As Attorney General, you have the power to determine the federal government's law enforcement priorities, including how agency resources can be best utilized. We believe that the Cole Memorandum provides a strong framework for effectively utilizing the DOJ's resources and balancing the law enforcement roles of the federal government and the states.
We respectfully request that you uphold the DOJ's existing policy regarding states that have implemented strong and effective regulations for recreational marijuana use and ask that the Cole Memorandum remain in place. It is critical that states can continue to implement these laws under the framework of the Cole Memorandum. In addition, we request that state and local elected officials, and public health and safety officials, be afforded an opportunity to comment on any shift in policy from that expressed in the Cole Memorandum, to avoid disruption of existing regulation and enforcement efforts. We appreciate your immediate attention to this request.
Thank you,
07M-Vitin-5795349 07M-Vitin



LCV Statement on Perry Confirmation Vote
Rep. DelBene Releases Report on Local Consequences of Repealing Healthcare Law
Advisor News
- Gen X confident in investment decisions, despite having no plan
- Most Americans optimistic about a financial ‘resolution rebound’ in 2026
- Mitigating recession-based client anxiety
- Terri Kallsen begins board chair role at CFP Board
- Advisors underestimate demand for steady, guaranteed income, survey shows
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Reframing lifetime income as an essential part of retirement planning
- Integrity adds further scale with blockbuster acquisition of AIMCOR
- MetLife Declares First Quarter 2026 Common Stock Dividend
- Using annuities as a legacy tool: The ROP feature
- Jackson Financial Inc. and TPG Inc. Announce Long-Term Strategic Partnership
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- TRAHAN SUPPORTS BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION TO END THE GOP HEALTH CARE CRISIS
- CT SENATE GOP: HEALTHCARE COSTS TOO MUCH IN CT, BUT ASSOCIATION HEALTH PLANS NEVER PASS
- Thousands in CT face higher health insurance costs after federal subsidies expired at start of 2026
- House passes bill to extend enhanced ACA subsidies 3 years
- US House backs extension of health insurance subsidies after Dems force vote
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News