Reinsurance Association Issues Public Comment on FEMA Notice - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
June 27, 2021 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Reinsurance Association Issues Public Comment on FEMA Notice

Targeted News Service

WASHINGTON, June 28 -- Frank Nutter, president of the Reinsurance Association of America, has issued a public comment on the Federal Emergency Management Agency notice entitled "Request for Information on FEMA Programs, Regulations, and Policies". The comment was written on June 23, 2021, and posted on June 24, 2021:

* * *

This letter is submitted by the Reinsurance Association of America (RAA) in response to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) "Request for Information on FEMA Programs, Regulations, and Policies" so that FEMA can: "...consider modifying, streamlining, expanding, or repealing in light of recent Executive orders..." and "ensure that its programs, regulations, and policies contain necessary, properly tailored, and up-to-date requirements that effectively achieve FEMA's mission in a manner that furthers the goals of advancing equity for all, including those in underserved communities, bolstering resilience from the impacts of climate change, particularly for those disproportionately impacted by climate change, and environmental justice."/1

The RAA is the leading trade association of property and casualty reinsurers doing business in the United States. RAA membership is diverse, including reinsurance underwriters and intermediaries licensed in the U.S. and those that conduct business on a cross border basis. The RAA also has life reinsurance affiliates and insurance-linked securities fund managers and market participants that are engaged in the assumption of property/casualty risks. The RAA represents its members before state, federal and international bodies.

The RAA supports a long-term reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and flood insurance reforms. The RAA also supports improving America's community resilience in the face of climate and natural disaster risks, including the risk of flooding. We specifically recommend that infrastructure legislation and FEMA programs, regulation, and policies establish Community Disaster Resilience Zones (CDRZ) and direct public and private sector resources to help improve infrastructure resilience, including housing resilience, for CDRZ communities that are the most in need and most at risk of natural disaster(s). Our CDRZ proposal is described in more detail below.

Climate Change and Natural Disaster Risks

The RAA has had a longstanding policy on climate change and is committed to working with policymakers, regulators, and the scientific, academic and business communities to assist in promoting awareness and understanding of the risks associated with climate change. A copy of RAA's policy can be found on our website./2

It is especially critical that at the federal, state, and local levels, the public sector in partnership with the private sector address significant natural disaster risks well in advance of the next significant flood, earthquake, or other devastating natural disaster event. Addressing these risks urgently is particularly important as the frequency, severity, devastation, and costs of many natural disasters continue to increase due to climate change.

In the financial services sector, property casualty insurers are the most exposed to natural disasters, especially those impacted by climate and weather. Within the insurance sector, reinsurers have the greatest financial stake in appropriate risk assessment. The industry is at great financial risk if it does not understand global and regional climate impacts, variability and developing scientific assessment of a changing climate. Integrating this information into the insurance system is an essential function. Insurance is a critical component for economic and social recovery from the effects of extreme weather and climate driven events. Open market insurance pricing is also a mechanism for conveying the consequences of decisions about where and how we build and where people chose to live. In this regard, it must be proactive and forward looking in a changing climate/weather environment.

Our industry is science based. Blending the actuarial sciences with the natural sciences is critical to providing the public with the financial resources needed to recover from natural catastrophic events. As the scientific community's knowledge of climate change continues to develop, it is important for our communities to incorporate that information into the exposure and risk assessment process and that it be conveyed to stakeholders, policyholders, the public and public officials that can or should address adaptation and mitigation alternatives. Developing an understanding about climate and its impact on various risks - for example, droughts, heat waves, the frequency and intensity of tropical hurricanes, thunderstorms and convective events, rising sea levels and storm surge, more extreme precipitation events and flooding - is critical to our role in translating the interdependencies of weather, climate risk assessment and pricing.

Climate-related and natural disaster risk exposure is broad-ranging. These risks are widespread, geographically diverse, and include a range of natural disaster perils impacting homeowners and renters, property owners, servicers, mortgage investors, taxpayers, and communities. It is important to ensure that these risk exposures are addressed and mitigated. Mitigation includes physical enhancements and insurance to better protect residential properties and other infrastructure against damage caused by natural disasters. For government programs, government-sponsored enterprises, private sector financial institutions, and taxpayers, financial mitigation also is important to protect against any mortgage credit default risk associated with natural disaster risk.

The RAA believes a variety of solutions should be used to improve community resilience to the benefit of all those in the value chain of climate and natural disaster risk exposure. The RAA also believes that it is important to address geographic, natural disaster peril, and socioeconomic diversity. Some traditional solutions, like property insurance protections for homeowners certainly can and should be utilized, but new analytical capabilities that increasingly and intelligently can help reduce risk and direct resources to achieving that goal also should be pursued.

Investing in Resilience for America's Communities is Critical, Logical, and Smart

In December 2019, the National Institute of Building Sciences issued its "Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves" report, which was funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development./3

The report describes that federal disaster mitigation has saved $6 for every $1 invested since 1995 and other mitigation-related activities, such as updating building codes to ensure resilient structures, and investments can save between $4 and $11 for every $1 spent. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), "Each state has been affected by at least $1 billion-dollar disaster since 1980."/4

There is demand, but the supply is inadequate.

Reducing the impact of climate and natural disaster risk in the first place, followed by other protections like traditional insurance and risk transfer, particularly to benefit low-income and minority homeowners and renters should be the top public and private-sector priority for climate and natural disaster resilience and risk management. That can be achieved by, first, identifying the communities that are most in need and most at risk of significant natural disasters. And second, it can be achieved by creating statutory and regulatory structures and incentives that direct public and private sector investments in infrastructure resilience.

The Administration and Members of Congress are proposing and considering ideas to direct more public and private sector funds toward infrastructure resilience, which includes housing, in this way. FEMA's Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development housing programs, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Capital Magnet Fund, and other federal programs should direct funding resources toward achieving housing climate and natural disaster resilience for "extremely low- and very low-income households" that face significant natural disaster risk and particularly that expose taxpayer-backed federal housing programs to climate and natural disaster risks./5

In general, RAA recommends that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) and all of its members prioritize climate and natural disaster resilience efforts for federally funded and federally-backed residential properties in these most in need and most at risk areas.

The RAA's Community Disaster Resilience Zones Proposal

Low-income and minority neighborhoods are disproportionately impacted by natural disasters./6

This fact should be a priority consideration for policymakers and the public and private sectors as we work to understand and address the climate and natural disaster-related risks facing communities across America. The RAA has developed an innovative approach to addressing climate and natural disaster resilience, specifically to improve infrastructure resilience in the face of natural disasters and address socio-economic disparities. The RAA urges the Administration, including FEMA, and Congress to include our proposal as part of the infrastructure and other legislation that may become law during the 117th Congress and federal programs, regulation, and policies.

The RAA developed an analytical tool and legislative proposal that aligns with President Joseph Biden's plan, Executive orders, announcement, and fiscal year 2022 budget proposal/7 and congressional interests to rebuild America's infrastructure, enable green initiatives and smart building to address the impact of climate change, create needed jobs and fuel the economic recovery, support historically underserved communities where the need is often greatest, and provide sources of much-needed resilience project funding to states and localities. (Appendix A includes examples of relevant excerpts from President Joseph Biden's "American Jobs Plan," Executive Order 14030 on "Climate-Related Financial Risk," announcement on "Biden Administration Invests $1 Billion To Protect Communities, Families, and Businesses Before Disaster Strikes," and "Budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2022").

The RAA's data analytics tool utilizes publicly available data to very clearly, by county, congressional district, and census tract in each state, understand where natural perils, older housing stock, and disadvantaged populations converge. The data in RAA's analytical tool is from FEMA's National Risk Index (NRI) supplemented with data from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS). We urge FEMA, other federal agencies, and policymakers to use the same information, particularly to understand the U.S. landscape and pinpoint and prioritize communities that are most in need and most at risk of significant natural disasters, diversified by state, congressional district, and natural disaster peril./8

In general, the RAA's proposal would create a federal structure that directs public and private-sector funding for resilience projects to communities most in need and most at risk from significant natural disaster(s). More specifically, it would:

1) Address the impact of climate change through data-driven analysis;

2) Establish community disaster resilience zones, or CDRZ, for communities most in need and most at risk of significant natural disaster(s); and

3) Direct and incentivize public and private-sector investment in the CDRZ to improve infrastructure resilience.

RAA's legislative proposal has a few core components to help achieve these objectives:

I. The first generally would codify, enhance, and utilize the FEMA's NRI data to find the intersection of risk, vulnerability, and low community resilience scores, as the basis to identify and establish the CDRZ that reflect diversity among the states by geography and type of peril, such as fire storm/wildfire, tornado, hurricane, flooding, ice storms, earthquake, wind, hail, and drought.

II. The second would, within CDRZ, coalesce a variety of funding mechanisms, providing a menu of financing enhancements and tax incentives that can focus federal, state, local, charitable, and private-sector investment in resilience projects. For example, to help fund resilience projects in CDRZ the proposal would establish:

* CDRZ taxable direct pay bonds, like Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds, which were one of three types of Build America Bonds that Congress created in 2009 as part of financial crisis economic recovery legislation;

* CDRZ tax-exempt facility private activity bonds subject to a separate volume cap, like Recovery Zone Facility Bonds (also in the 2009 recovery legislation), and provide for life and property/casualty insurers' exclusion from proration for investments in these CDRZ bonds;

* Federal transferrable tax credits for individuals for resilience improvements to housing in CDRZ;

* Federal tax credits for charitable contributions for resilience projects in CDRZ; and

* Federal tax credits for community-level projects in CDRZ that are tradeable, transferrable, and do not expire, and allow proceeds from the sale of certified tax credits to be used to, for example, meet matching requirements for federally funded resilience projects.

III. The third would prioritize, set aside, and unlock federal program funding to invest in resilience projects in CDRZ. This could include waiving, reducing, or allowing other forms of financing, such as the proceeds from the sale of tax credits mentioned above and in-kind and charitable donations, to qualify for matching funds for resilience projects in CDRZ. Allowing a variety of resources to contribute to and invest in resilience projects in CDRZ, as they relate to federal program matching fund requirements, could significantly unlock resources for CDRZ resilience projects. For example, with more flexibility to meet matching fund requirements, CDRZ resilience projects could more likely benefit from FEMA's BRIC program funding and funding from other federal programs. FEMA and other federal agencies also should provide resources, such as financial and technical assistance, to CDRZ communities to help facilitate resilience project planning.

In addition, the RAA's proposal has been favorably mentioned during three recent congressional hearings:

* March 18, 2021, House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management hearing on "Building Smarter: The Benefits of Investing in Resilience and Mitigation";/9

* May 18, 2021, Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs hearing on, "Reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program, Part I";/10 and

* May 19, 2021, House Committee on Ways and Means hearing on "Leveraging the Tax Code for Infrastructure Investment"./11

Housing is Infrastructure

The Administration and Congress also have an important leadership role to play in prioritizing and directing federal program funding toward housing resilience. Housing, especially affordable housing, that can withstand the most significant disaster(s) that communities across the country face is an investment in critical infrastructure.

To that end, the RAA supports language that House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters included in her "Housing is Infrastructure Act of 2021" discussion draft legislation that was noticed by the House Financial Services Committee for its April 14, 2021, legislative hearing that: prioritizes applications for the $70 Billion authorized for public housing that include "climate and natural disaster resilience and water and energy efficiency" plans and authorizes nearly $17 billion for "climate and natural disaster resilience and water and energy efficiency" for each of eleven federally funded housing programs. The discussion draft also prioritizes public housing applications and sets aside federal grant funds for housing in areas of persistent poverty./12

The RAA supports continued improvements to Chairwoman Waters's bill, other legislation that may be considered as part of the forthcoming infrastructure package, and FEMA and other federal agency programs, regulations, and policies so that they most impactfully can help communities that are most in need and most at risk of natural disaster(s) to become more resilient.

The Protection Gap, Insurance, and the NFIP

Natural Disaster Insurance Protection Gap

Homeowners and renters, property owners, mortgage investors, taxpayers, and communities face risks due to climate change, natural disaster risks, and the lack of insurance coverage or underinsurance of such coverage. There is a serious and significant natural disaster insurance protection gap in the United States. The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Federal Insurance Office's Federal Advisory Committee on Insurance (FACI) has a subcommittee that is dedicated to addressing it. Several RAA members serve on both the FACI and the "Subcommittee on Addressing the Protection Gap through Public-Private Partnerships and Other Mechanisms." During FACI's December 2019 meeting, the Subcommittee cited statistics to provide examples of the insurance protection gap in the U.S. and issued recommendations that FHFA should consider./13

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has published alarming statistics about the disaster insurance protection gap. For example, one NAIC statistic cited in the Subcommittee's presentation is that "Only 1% of properties outside of flood zones have flood insurance, yet half of U.S. floods occur in these areas." Various studies and reports, including a 2018 report by AIR Worldwide, have warned that the next big earthquake to impact California, likely by 2044, could result in $170 billion in total damage and almost half would be residential-related loss, $37 billion of which would be uninsured./14

Given the likelihood of future, significant, and costly natural disasters throughout the U.S. and uninsured residential costs, it is important to have a coordinated effort and to close the insurance protection gap.

FEMA, Congress, the Treasury, the NAIC, other relevant federal agencies, state and local officials, and the private sector, including reinsurers, should determine a comprehensive strategy to identify and address the natural disaster insurance protection gap in the U.S. and the risks it poses to homeowners and renters, property owners, individuals, businesses, and federal programs and taxpayers - particularly as it relates to frequent and potentially severe perils, such as floods and earthquakes. It also is important to close the insurance protection gap, and Congress and federal regulators should help initiate efforts to close the insurance protection gap via traditional insurance and risk transfer. Congress and federal regulators can further facilitate a private market for flood insurance, potentially providing consumers with more flood insurance options. One way to achieve this is for the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and HUD, for the Federal Housing Administration, to align their regulations and/or guidance for private flood insurance with those issued in 2019 by federal lending regulators./15

(In 2020, HUD issued a proposed regulation to align its regulations and guidance with that of the 2019 federal lending regulators)./16

Primary Insurance

Traditional insurance solutions - such as primary property insurance protection, including earthquake, wind, fire, and flood insurance - are critical for people, property, jobs, businesses, and communities to be resilient in the aftermath of natural disasters. That is especially true since federal disaster assistance is provided only when there is a federally declared disaster and typically results in a fraction of what insurance assistance can provide. For example, according to FEMA, in 2019, the average, annual flood insurance premium was $700 (about $58 per month) and the average claim payout was $53,000./17

Meanwhile, in 2019, federal disaster assistance was capped at $34,900 with an average annual payment of $6,246./18

Ensuring that the protection gap is bridged, and property insurance adequately covers the climate and natural disaster risk(s) involved are of utmost importance. Risk transfer products that protect each stakeholder from climate and natural disaster risks can play an important role.

Parametric Insurance

To supplement traditional insurance solutions - including to provide coverage for evacuation and to infuse liquidity quickly into a community to cover immediate post-disaster expenses - parametric insurance addresses the protection gap and enhances community resilience. Parametric solutions have been developed for earthquake, wind, fire, and flood risks. This coverage can be tailored to meet the needs of individuals, public entities, and lenders.

Risk Transfer

Risk transfer, including reinsurance, is a successful solution used by both the public and private sector including (re)insurers, financial institutions, federal and state programs, and government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. One notable example of a federal program's use of risk transfer is FEMA's Reinsurance Program. In the program's first year (2017), FEMA collected $1.042 billion to help pay the cost of NFIP losses and claims resulting from Hurricane Harvey. The coverage cost $150 million, and the program successfully renewed the subsequent year. This example is a true testament of successful private-public partnerships. (Please see below for more detailed comments on the NFIP). The reinsurance industry also successfully has partnered with the California Earthquake Authority (CEA) on reinsurance protection for its earthquake risks as well as the recently created California Wildfire Fund, which also is administered by the CEA. Similarly, risk transfer has been an important part of the Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corporation and the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (FHCF) for many years.

National Flood Insurance Program

The RAA greatly appreciates the leadership of Members of Congress, specifically those who serve on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House Committee on Financial Services, for starting a formal conversation on reauthorization of the NFIP. The RAA has urged Congress to reauthorize NFIP and to enact flood insurance and mitigation-related reforms. The RAA supports a long-term reauthorization of the NFIP and reforms that:

* Continue to strengthen NFIP's financial framework and resiliency so that it can pay claims, particularly after catastrophic events;

* Remove impediments to consumer choice and confirm consumer protections; and

* Modernize the statute to give FEMA additional tools to encourage additional private market participation, including capital, in NFIP to benefit consumers and taxpayers.

From a reinsurance perspective, this statement highlights our top priorities for flood insurance reform. As a member, RAA also supports the SmarterSafer and BuildStrong coalitions' reform proposals, and RAA supports legislation to create a state flood mitigation revolving fund program.

I. Support NFIP Reinsurance Program. The RAA supports FEMA's NFIP Reinsurance Program and would request that it be preserved in NFIP reauthorization and reform legislation./19

The RAA has long advocated for the NFIP to utilize the private market to help manage the financial burden of the NFIP's catastrophic flood risk by providing financial backing for the government's flood risk, protecting taxpayers, and helping the program to be more resilient and pay claims. In 2021, for the fifth consecutive year, FEMA has successfully administered its NFIP Reinsurance Program that transfers risk from the NFIP to the capital markets, specifically through reinsurance placements and a catastrophe bond issuance. As this statement previously mentioned, the benefits of FEMA's risk transfer program were made clear in the program's first year (2017), when FEMA collected $1.042 billion to help pay the cost of NFIP losses and claims resulting from Hurricane Harvey. The coverage cost $150 million, and the program successfully renewed the subsequent year. The amount FEMA collected helped pay NFIP policyholder claims, improved NFIP's financial viability, and protected taxpayers.

II. Confirm Consumer Protections. The RAA supports legislation from the 116th Congress (H.R. 1666) introduced by Representatives Kathy Castor (D-FL) and Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) to amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (NFIA) to "consider any period during which a property was continuously covered by private flood insurance to be a period of continuous coverage, including for the purposes of NFIP subsidies."/20

In two previous congresses, similar legislation had broad bipartisan support. In 2016, by a vote of 419-0, the House passed a similar provision as part of H.R. 2901 and, in 2017, by a vote of 58-0, the House Financial Services Committee passed a similar provision as part of H.R. 1422.

Flood insurance uncertainty for consumers, as it relates to continuous coverage and potential rate increases by the NFIP, are an impediment to consumers buying private flood insurance and limit consumers' choices. Insurance agents and brokers have stated that "...the risk of a substantial NFIP rate increase should the consumer later wish to return to the NFIP often makes insurance agents and brokers hesitant to recommend private flood insurance policies."/21

It is important that Congress and FEMA provide consumers with clarity about continuous coverage compliance so that current and future NFIP policyholders are confident that they have complied with the law's continuous coverage requirements by having an NFIP or private flood insurance policy. For example, if a consumer leaves the NFIP to secure a private flood policy with better coverage and a better price and later re-assumes an NFIP policy, so long as the consumer had continuous coverage, that NFIP policy should be at the same rate and terms as if the consumer had continuously maintained an NFIP policy.

III. Modernize 1968 NFIA Part A Authority. When enacted in 1968, over 50 years ago, the NFIA incorporated two approaches to providing consumers with flood insurance, Part A and Part B. As the private flood insurance market continues to develop with reforms Congress has made to Part B, particularly those enacted in 2012 and 2014, Congress also should modernize Part A of the NFIA and clarify that FEMA can use its authorities simultaneously with the Part B program. Re-purposing and modernizing the statutory language in Part A would give FEMA additional tools to partner with private insurers, facilitate the participation of private insurers in NFIP on a risk-sharing basis, further improve NFIP's viability, increase the NFIP's resources to pay claims, and increase flood insurance opportunities for consumers. Part A reforms also can lead to a stronger public-private partnership, give private insurers experience in underwriting flood risk, and help close the flood insurance coverage gap.

The Part A statutory language currently authorizes the FEMA Administrator (Administrator) to facilitate and assist the creation of a pool of insurers on a risk sharing basis with the Federal government to provide flood insurance through their network of agents and policyholder relationships. Under the statute, the Administrator defines the qualifications of insurers for the pool and risk capital to be provided. The Administrator is authorized to enter into a contractual relationship with the pool defining the insured risk to be retained and the government's risk through its reinsurance of the pool. Pursuant to the statute, the financial arrangement recognizes that the NFIP provides some subsidies to certain policyholders.

The current NFIP program, which is authorized under NFIA Part B, provides that the Federal government through the NFIP would fully bear the insured risk and that insurers could be retained as fiscal agents of the NFIP with no risk bearing role. (The recent exception to that is NFIP's Reinsurance Program referenced above.)

The RAA specifically recommends that NFIP reform and reauthorization legislation include the amendment offered to the "National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019" and withdrawn by Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) during the House Financial Services Committee's June 11-12, 2019, mark up./22

The amendment language would: (1) Require FEMA to solicit ideas for risk-sharing demonstration programs; (2) Provide FEMA with authority, but not require it, to conduct risk-sharing demonstration programs; and (3) Make technical amendments to the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Part A authority, which FEMA can use for risk-sharing demonstration programs.

The above-mentioned reforms can further facilitate the development of a private flood insurance market and improve the viability of NFIP. The reinsurance market is interested and has the capacity to underwrite flood insurance risk, including extreme flood risk, in both the public NFIP program, private market, and any future public-private flood insurance partnerships. Actions taken in recent years by some states, such as Florida, have demonstrated the interest and benefits of private insurers assuming a broad cross-section of risk, and the same would result from the above flood insurance reforms. Reinsurers stand ready to partner with both the private- and public-sectors as the flood market transitions.

Conclusion

The RAA looks forward to continuing to work with the Administration, including FEMA, and Members of Congress to improve America's housing and community resilience in the face of climate and natural disaster risks by prioritizing and directing public and private sector resources to communities that are the most in need and most at risk of natural disaster(s), closing the insurance protection gap, and enacting a long-term reauthorization of the NFIP and flood insurance reforms that facilitate the development of a private flood insurance market. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and your consideration of our recommendations. The RAA and its members would be happy to meet with you regarding the recommendations in this letter or answer any questions you may have.

View attachment at: https://downloads.regulations.gov/FEMA-2021-0011-0168/attachment_1.pdf

Sincerely,

Frank Nutter

President

* * *

Footnotes:

1/ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/04/22/2021-08444/request-for-information-on-fema-programsregulations-and-policies; https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/07/2021-11932/request-forinformation-on-fema-programs-regulations-and-policies-public-meetings-extension-of

2/ https://www.reinsurance.org/Advocacy/RAA_Policy_Statements/

3/ https://www.nibs.org/projects/natural-hazard-mitigation-saves-2019-report

4/ https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2010-2019-landmark-decade-us-billion-dollar-weatherand-climate

5/ https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/htf/; https://www.cdfifund.gov/programs-training/programs/cmf

6/ https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/LowIncomeResilience-2.pdf

7/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/; https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/05/20/executive-order-on-climate-relatedfinancial-risk/; https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/05/24/fact-sheet-bidenadministration-invests-1-billion-to-protect-communities-families-and-businesses-before-disaster-strikes/; https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/05/26/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan-willproduce-preserve-and-retrofit-more-than-2-million-affordable-housing-units-and-create-good-paying-jobs/; https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/budget_fy22.pdf

8/ https://hazards.geoplatform.gov/portal/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=ddf915a24fb24dc8863eed96bc3345f8; https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs

9/ https://transportation.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/building-smarter-the-benefits-of-investing-inresilience-and-mitigation

10/ https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/05/11/2021/reauthorization-of-the-national-flood-insurance-programpart-i

11/ https://waysandmeans.house.gov/legislation/hearings/ways-and-means-committee-hearing-leveraging-tax-codeinfrastructure-investment

12/ https://financialservices.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=407532

13/ https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/311/December2019FACI_ProtectionGapPresentation.pdf; https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/311/December2019FACI_ProtectionGapProposedRecs.pdf

14/ https://www.air-worldwide.com/Publications/Infographics/Who-Will-Pay-for-the-Next-Great-CaliforniaEarthquake-/

15/ https://www.fdic.gov/news/financial-institution-letters/2019/fil19008.html

16/ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/23/2020-25105/acceptance-of-private-flood-insurance-forfha-insured-mortgages; https://www.hud.gov/press/press_releases_media_advisories/HUD_No_20_191

17/ https://www.fema.gov/data-visualization/historical-flood-risk-and-costs

18/ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/10/22/2018-22884/notice-of-maximum-amount-of-assistanceunder-the-individuals-and-households-program; FEMA communication with RAA, 4/16/2021

19/ https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/reinsurance

20/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/housebill/1422?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.+1422%22%5D%7D&s=1&r=3

21/ https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hhrg-116-ba00-wstate-heidrickc-20190313.pdf

22/ https://financialservices.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=407747; https://financialservices.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=403829

* * *

The notice can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2021-0011-0001

TARGETED NEWS SERVICE (founded 2004) features non-partisan 'edited journalism' news briefs and information for news organizations, public policy groups and individuals; as well as 'gathered' public policy information, including news releases, reports, speeches. For more information contact MYRON STRUCK, editor, [email protected], Springfield, Virginia; 703/304-1897; https://targetednews.com

Older

Belfast curling club must rebuild after burst pipe leads to major water damage

Newer

Consortium of Citizens With Disabilities Emergency Management Task Force Issues Public Comment on FEMA Notice

Advisor News

  • Nearly half of nonretirees doubt they will fully retire
  • How much could failure to fund Social Security cost average Americans?
  • How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
  • Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
  • Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Jackson CEO Laura Prieskorn to retire at the end of 2026
  • Has your annuity been reinsured in the Cayman Islands? Here’s why it matters
  • DOL slams pension risk transfer lawsuit as ‘opportunistic’ litigation
  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of New York Life Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
  • Advisors don’t have an annuity problem; they have an integration problem.
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • New Managed Care Data Have Been Reported by Shana L. Metzger and Co-Authors (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services staffing regulations in critical access hospitals: Implications for nurse practitioner practice and rural care access): Managed Care
  • Florida man arrested after sending 7 former co-workers' paychecks to his own bank account, deputies say
  • Insurers hedge on Trump-backed pledge to improve denials process
  • SCHNEIDER, SEWELL, OCASIO-CORTEZ LEAD 52 DEMOCRATS URGING SECRETARY KENNEDY AND ADMINISTRATOR OZ TO RESCIND TRUMP POLICY TO ALLOW HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES TO OFFER PREDATORY LOANS
  • Covered California health insurance premiums for San Joaquin Valley enrollees will rise by about 11% or more in 2027
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • AM Best Comments on Credit Ratings of Horace Mann Educators Corporation and Its Subsidiaries Following Announced Transaction with Medical Mutual of Ohio
  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Hanwha General Insurance Company Limited
  • Globe Life boosts Q2 earnings, eyes AI shift for long-term growth
  • ATTORNEY GENERAL BRENNA BIRD LEADS FIGHT TO PROTECT IOWA PENSIONS
  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Bao Viet Insurance Corporation
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Press Releases

  • Prosperity Life GroupSM Launches Prosperity PathWaySM Series, Bringing Greater Choice and Flexibility to Retirement Income Planning
  • Senior Market Sales® Fortifies Annuity Reach With Acquisition of Retirement Planning Firm Stratton & Company
  • RFP #T01625
  • Rockwood Programs Appoints Kerry Ladouceur as Vice President, Financial Lines
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet