Op-Ed: President Trump vs. the health-care middleman
Our recent government shutdown has brought to the forefront of the national conversation something most people have sensed for a long time: health insurance in
The word “insurance” is really a misnomer when it comes to modern health plans. It’s simply pre-paid healthcare, or more accurately, sick care in its current form.
Just imagine if car insurance were structured like health insurance. Car insurance companies would pay for your gas, oil changes, and repairs. The government would mandate that they cover all these services – whether you liked it or not. It would be expensive, and nobody would question why. Before long, the car insurance companies would find a way to make it harder to buy gas, so you would use less of it, and they could increase their profit margins. Maybe only a few oil change providers would be “in network,” located far away from you, and hard to find. This would be great for the insurance company's stockholders, but not so good for the car owner.
Eventually, as prices climbed and quality decreased, the politicians who caused the problems in the first place would get involved. They would declare greed the problem and cap profit margins that car insurance companies were allowed to make. The insurers would have to find a workaround to maintain margins. Perhaps they buy up the gas stations, jack up the prices, get lower octane gas, and make you only use certain stations based on which GBM (gasoline benefit manager) you have. If they ran low on cash, the government would bail them out. Car insurance companies are too big to fail.
After a while, with high-priced, scarce gas and oil, and insurance premiums already high, car owners would run out of money for car washes. The government would come in to save the day by mandating that insurance companies pay for that too, with a subsidy or two for anyone who can’t afford a plan. Premium prices would go up again, and the cycle would continue until everyone’s car was dirty, in disrepair, running on empty, with insurance premiums more expensive than the car. This would look great for the insurance company stock as they take a percentage of the total money moved around. The more products and services they are mandated to cover, the better. Simple math: move more money, make more profit. Until one day, the system would break.
As preposterous as the car insurance analogy may sound, that is exactly where we are with healthcare in America. All true market forces connecting the consumer with the product have been removed. The result is predictably higher prices and lower quality. Obamacare mandates compounded the problem, and the system is indeed about to break. Premiums are consuming half or more of many people's paychecks for bare bones insurance. Forget the “Cadillac plans.”
It’s time to return power to the people and Make Insurance Insurance Again. People should be allowed to have unlimited Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) funded with pretax dollars that roll over forever and bypass the death tax. Employers should be allowed to contribute to their employees' HSAs if they so choose, just like with 401(k)s. The consumer should then be allowed to buy catastrophic insurance to cover amounts exceeding the HSA limit.
Imagine if a third of the nation had
A true free market would exist below the catastrophic coverage amounts, where healthcare consumers could shop and negotiate for better products and services. They would seek out care that keeps them well more of the time, rather than paying only to treat them after they are sick. Prices would be immediately transparent, like a restaurant menu, with no government mandate needed. Otherwise, people would shop elsewhere.
Naysayers will ask: What about Medicaid? For the abled-bodied, it could just be a contribution to their HSA and payment of their catastrophic insurance premium. In
A small safety net system would likely still be needed at the state level to care for those who will never be able to care for themselves. However, it could be administered directly by states and would be orders of magnitude simpler than the current Medicaid monstrosities.
As the old Geico commercial used to say: we’re not sure who coined the term “eliminate the middle man,” but we can be fairly certain it wasn't the middleman. In this case, health insurers are the middlemen that need to be eliminated. Or at least restored to their more proper role of providing actual insurance, rather than low-quality, overpriced prepaid healthcare.


Report: Tech-enabled litigation and AI threaten to destabilize insurance industry
At LWV forum, Massullo, Marwah present contrasting visions for Florida’s future
Advisor News
- What to discuss during the first retirement planning meeting
- Inflation, competing priorities and uncertainty erode retirement security
- As health premiums rise, 1 in 8 workers cut retirement savings
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
- AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
- USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
- How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
- Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- How the law protecting Americans from surprise medical bills is driving up healthcare costs
- Medicare Plus supplement vs. Medicare Advantage (Maybe) 2026– Healthful Hints
- ‘Medically frail’ Medicaid enrollees won’t have to prove their inability to work to keep coverage
- IMPLEMENTATION OF IMMIGRANT ELIGIBILITY RESTRICTIONS FOR ACA MARKETPLACE SUBSIDIES UNDER THE 2025 RECONCILIATION LAW: ISSUES TO CONSIDER
- ACA HEALTH INSURANCE RATES RELEASED FOR 2027 OPEN ENROLLMENT
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News