Monash University: Laws Needed to Prevent Gene-Based Life Insurance Discrimination – Report
Laws are needed to protect Australians from life insurance discrimination based on genetic tests that identify increased risk of certain medical conditions, a Federal Government-funded report has found.
Led by
The A-GLIMMER (Australian Genetics & Life Insurance Moratorium: Monitoring the Effectiveness and Response) Final Stakeholder Report found that genetic discrimination in life insurance occurs in
More than 90 per cent of health professionals (93), 88 per cent of patients with experience of genetic testing, 78 per cent of the general public, and 86 per cent of researchers believed legislation was required to regulate the use of genetic test results in life insurance underwriting.
The report follows a 2018 Federal Government Joint Parliamentary Committee Inquiry report that recommended a ban on genetic discrimination in life insurance underwriting.
In 2019, the life insurance industry's peak body, the
Through the
"Our research shows, overwhelmingly, that Australian stakeholders believe current protections against genetic discrimination are inadequate, and that legislation is required," she said. "We are calling on the government to legislate to protect consumers from genetic discrimination and remove the barrier to genetic testing and genomic medicine."
A-GLIMMER conducted research with consumers, health professionals, researchers and the financial industry. It found that genetics had great potential to improve medicine and public health, through enabling diagnosis, prevention and early treatment of disease. However,
"Insurance fears can also act as a barrier, by deterring people from having potentially life-saving genetic testing that could match them to tailored interventions and treatments, as well as from participation in genetic research," the report found.
Among other things, the A-GLIMMER report found:
* Key stakeholders (health professionals, consumers and researchers) are concerned about the life insurance industry's self-regulation and absence of Australian Government oversight of the FSC Moratorium, and express a low level of confidence in its effectiveness
* There are instances of non-compliance, including where insurance companies have asked insurance applicants about genetic testing, contrary to FSC Moratorium terms
* There is a lack of effective mechanisms to enforce the moratorium or seek redress
* Stakeholders are concerned about the uncertainty inherent in the moratorium's industry-led nature, and the potential for to life insurers to use genetic test results in the future
* Many genomic researchers reported that the potential use of genomic test results by insurers was a barrier to the recruitment of research participants
The report recommended that the Australian Government:
* Amend the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) to prohibit insurers from using genetic or genomic test results to discriminate between applicants for risk-rated insurance, and consider amendments to the regulation of financial services to ensure insurers are subject to a positive duty to not discriminate.
* Allocate responsibility and appropriate resources to the
"The report highlights that
Investigator Team
Associate Professor
Dr
Professor
Dr
Professor
Dr
Professor Martin Delatycki, Victorian Clinical Genetics Services
Professor
Associate Professor
Dr Kristen Nowak,
* * *
* * *
Original text here: https://www.monash.edu/news/articles/laws-needed-to-prevent-gene-based-life-insurance-discrimination-report
House Education & Workforce Subcommittee Issues Testimony From Center on Health Insurance Reforms Assistant Research Professor
House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee Issues Testimony From America's Physician Groups Board Chair Daghestani
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News