Lara’s reforms OK, but miss real problem
California’s second-largest home insurer,
Farmers specifically cited an improved insurance marketplace for its decision. “This is a positive step forward for
“More work to be done” is an understatement. A week later,
Those new rules allow home-insurance companies to use catastrophe models for rate setting in exchange for expanding their coverage, especially in wildfire-prone areas. They also require insurers to consider homeowners’ fire-hardening measures when setting rates. Lara also has approved a series of rate hikes. These long-awaited changes are helpful, but don’t address the core problem: California’s system of insurance regulation.
Consider the absurdity of the situation. Insurance companies are in the business of writing insurance policies. Yet they don’t want to write them here. State officials blame climate change and inflation, but the real problem is rooted in Proposition 103 — the 1988 ballot measure that gave the insurance commissioner power to approve rate hikes and mandate price rollbacks.
These are price controls, which lead to shortages. If insurance companies cannot set rates to reflect their risk, they stop writing policies rather than face exposure. The results: fewer policies and over-reliance on the troubled state-created insurer of last resort (the FAIR Plan).
Lara deserves credit for bucking consumer/trial-attorney advocates for the current system, but at some point
©2024 MediaNews Group, Inc. Visit ocregister.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Home sales remain even but new inventory could shift Flathead Valley market
Trump should reform financial watchdogs. Here’s how
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News