HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC. – 10-K – MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
The following discussion should be read along with the audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as Part II, "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 .
Business Environment
We continue to see uncertainty in the economy, our industry, and our company,
with challenges for customers and suppliers, labor shortages, supply chain
challenges, and inflation, among other impacts.
U.S. Government Contracts - Long-term uncertainty exists with respect to overall levels of defense spending across the future years' defense plan, and it is likely thatU.S. Government discretionary spending levels will continue to be subject to significant pressure. The fiscal year 2023 budget cycle concluded with the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act ("NDAA") for fiscal year 2023 onDecember 23, 2022 and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 onDecember 29, 2022 . The NDAA broadly supported our shipbuilding programs, including multiyear procurement authority for up to 15 DDG Flight III destroyers, a fleet requirement of no less than 31 operational amphibious warships (LPD/LHD/LHA), including a minimum of 10 amphibious assault ships (LHD/LHA), and bundle acquisition authority for LPD/LHA amphibious warship procurement. Final defense appropriations were included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act and provided funding for threeArleigh Burke class (DDG 51) destroyers, twoVirginia class (SSN 774) attack submarines and continued funding for LPD 32 (unnamed) andFallujah (LHA 9). Additionally, the appropriations measure provided advance procurement funding for LPD 33, LHA 10, and a thirdArleigh Burke class (DDG 51) destroyer in fiscal year 2024. The bill also provided funding for theColumbia class (SSBN 826) ballistic-missile submarine program,Gerald R. Ford class (CVN 78) nuclear aircraft carrier programs, and the refueling and complex overhaul ("RCOH") of USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74), as well as funding to support large surface combatant shipyard infrastructure and the submarine industrial base.
The federal budget environment remains a significant long-term risk.
Considerable uncertainty exists regarding how future budget and program
decisions will develop and what challenges budget changes will present for the
defense
29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- industry. We believe continued budget pressures could have serious implications for defense discretionary spending, the defense industrial base, including HII, and the customers, employees, suppliers, subcontractors, investors, and communities that rely on companies in the defense industrial base. Although it is difficult to determine specific impacts, we expect that over the longer term, the budget environment may result in fewer contract awards and lower revenues, profits, and cash flows from ourU.S. Government contracts. It is likely budget and program decisions made in this environment will have long-term impacts on HII and the entire defense industry. Political and Economic Environment - The global geopolitical and economic environment continues to be impacted by uncertainty, heightened tensions, and instability. Geopolitical relationships have changed, and are continuing to change, and theU.S. and its allies face a global security environment that includes threats from state and non-state actors, including major global powers, as well as terrorist organizations, emerging nuclear tensions, diverse regional security concerns, and political instability. These global threats persist across all domains, from undersea to space to cyber, and the global market for defense products, services, and solutions is driven by these complex and evolving security challenges. Our current operating environment exists in the broader context of political and socioeconomic priorities and reflects, among other things, the continued impact of and uncertainty surrounding geopolitical tensions, financial market volatility, inflation, a challenging labor market, and the continued threat posed by COVID-19. InFebruary 2022 , Russian forces invadedUkraine , and the conflict is continuing. In response,the United States and other countries imposed economic and trade sanctions, export controls, and other restrictions. This conflict and the associated sanctions have disrupted the global economy, causing heightened cybersecurity risks, supply chain challenges, higher energy costs, and an exacerbation of existing inflationary pressures. Additionally, and more broadly, tensions withChina and changes in international trade policies, including higher tariffs on imported goods and materials, could impact the global market for defense products, services, and solutions. In addition to price surges in energy, food, and aluminum, an increase in inflation has led to higher costs of various commodities and supplier products. In an era of unanticipated cost increases, the inclusion of mitigation mechanisms, such as economic price adjustment clauses, in our contracts help mitigate certain risks attributable to price inflation. Our bids for longer-term firm fixed-price contracts typically include assumptions for labor and other contract costs that historically have been sufficient to cover cost increases over the period of performance. If, however, recent inflationary conditions continue over the long-term, our cost assumptions may not be sufficient to cover potential contract cost growth or may impact the availability of resources to execute the respective contracts. Management is closely monitoring possible cost impacts with our customers. The macro labor market continues to present significant challenges, and those challenges continue to impact our operations and our financial performance. We are aggressively responding to the labor market challenges, including utilizing outside leased labor and overtime to mitigate the short-term deficit of employees and implementing aggressive hiring and retention programs. Labor shortages are also impacting our supply chain, resulting in longer lead times for materials, parts, and other supplies, as well as inflationary pressure. Our longer term ability to meet contract requirements, as well as our financial performance, are dependent on our ability to attract and retain a stable skilled workforce. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 ("IRA") was signed into law during the third quarter of 2022 and included provisions for an alternative minimum tax and a one percent excise tax on share repurchases. We anticipate being subject to the excise tax beginning in 2023 and continue to evaluate other provisions of the IRA for their impact on our business. COVID-19 Pandemic - The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically impacted the global economic environment, including labor shortages and supply chain challenges. The COVID-19 crisis initially had a significant impact on theU.S. labor market, and the resulting challenges and uncertainty have exacerbated already existing workforce trends. Talent attraction and retention and the ability to maintain a qualified workforce affects not only industry prime contractors but suppliers as well. Challenges incurred by our suppliers relative to their workforces, access to necessary components, materials, and other supplies at reasonable prices, and access to support services, such as shipping and transportation, may impact the ability of suppliers to provide agreed-upon goods and services in a timely, compliant, and cost-effective manner. We may in the future incur additional costs and performance challenges, including as a result of higher prices, schedule delays, or the need to identify and develop alternative suppliers. 30 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our employees, customers, suppliers, and communities (collectively, "COVID-19 Events"). While costs related to COVID-19 Events are allowable underU.S. Government contracts, our contract financial estimates reflect profit margin impact uncertainty, because such costs may not result in equitable adjustments, particularly on firm fixed-price and fixed-price incentive contracts, or may not be adequately covered by insurance. Reinsurers under our property insurance have failed to acknowledge coverage for various losses related to COVID-19, and we filed a complaint in state court inVermont seeking a judgment declaring that our business interruption and other losses associated with COVID-19 are covered by our property insurance program. We also initiated arbitration proceedings against other reinsurers seeking similar relief. TheVermont court dismissed our complaint, and we appealed the decision to theVermont Supreme Court , which reversed and remanded the lower court's decision inSeptember 2022 , allowing our claim to proceed. No assurance can be provided regarding the ultimate resolution of this matter. See Note 14: Investigations, Claims, and Litigation.
Defense Industry Overview
The United States faces a complex, uncertain, and rapidly changing national security environment.President Biden released his first National Security Strategy (the "NSS") inOctober 2022 . The NSS, which continues theU.S. focus onChina as the "pacing challenge" andRussia as an "acute" threat, calls for investments in emerging technologies and modernizing theU.S. military, with a special focus on allies in the Indo-Pacific region andEurope .The Biden Administration also released inOctober 2022 the public version of its 2022 National Defense Strategy (the "NDS"). Under the NDS, the Indo-Pacific region remains at the heart ofU.S. defense planning, and primary focus is placed on the need to sustain and strengthenU.S. deterrence againstChina . The NDS also takes into account the challenges posed byRussia , including those connected with its invasion ofUkraine , along with threats posed byNorth Korea ,Iran , and violent extremist organizations. Additionally, 'non-traditional' threats, such as pandemic disease and climate change, are included in the NDS as part of the national security dialogue. Integrated deterrence, the defining principle of the NDS, seeks to alignDoD activities and investments across all theaters, across the full spectrum of conflict, and across all domains, including space and cyberspace, as well as a closer working relationship with theU.S.'s network of allies and partners to deter aggression, exemplified in the Indo-Pacific region by theAustralia ,U.K. , andU.S. AUKUS agreement and the trilateral cooperation agreement withJapan andKorea . TheU.S. also faces a more lethal and disruptive battlefield, combined across domains and conducted at increasing speed and reach. The security environment is affected by rapid technological advancements and the changing character of war. The drive to develop new capabilities and enhance lethality is relentless, expanding to address emerging threats from peer-competitors as well as actors with lower barriers of entry, and moving at accelerating speed. To address these rapidly-evolving threats, theU.S. is investing in new capabilities and lethality enhancements, including unmanned and autonomous systems and platforms; artificial intelligence; hypersonics; directed energy; resilient networks; command, control, communications, computers, cyber, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; and targeting requirements and microelectronics. Technologies are being prioritized that can penetrate and operate inside highly-contested and highly-defended territory, both physical and cyber. We anticipate theU.S. Navy's force projection strategy will continue to emphasize sea control and sea denial, enabling power projection against adversaries with long-range weapons and full-spectrum joint domain capabilities. TheNavy will likely continue to employ the evolving concept of Distributed Maritime Operations ("DMO"), which features multiple sensors and shooters that are widely dispersed across a broad range of manned and unmanned platforms and linked through resilient networks. Naval forces are participating in a largerDoD -wide objective to modernize command and control architecture, the concept to connect sensors from all of the military services into a single network known as Joint All-Domain Command and Control ("JADC2"). Future conflicts may require leaders to analyze the operating environment and make decisions rapidly. With JADC2,DoD envisions creating an "internet of things" network that would connect numerous sensors with weapons systems, using artificial intelligence algorithms to help improve decision-making. Project Overmatch is theNavy's effort to develop the networks, infrastructure, data architecture, and analytics to participate in this larger, networked military operating environment. The end-state for the "Future Navy " envisions a fleet designed to ensure the wholeness of combat capability and lethal forces maximizing the benefits of DMO, expeditionary advanced base operations, and littoral operations in a contested environment. Manned and unmanned technology will be used to expand reach, lethality, and warfighter awareness. TheNavy's force structure goal of 355 ships, identified in theDecember 2016 Force Structure Assessment and codified in the fiscal year 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, has remained the fleet objective for six years. TheNavy and theDoD have been working to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. TheNavy submitted a long-range shipbuilding plan with the fiscal year 2023 budget request, but, instead of providing a single 31 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30-year outlook for shipbuilding, the service issued three separate plans for fiscal year 2023. TheNavy crafted low-end and high-end plans based on two separate funding profiles, and a third profile emphasized the building of attack submarines andColumbia class (SSBN 826) nuclear ballistic missile submarines. In 2022, theNavy also delivered its initial, long-range ship maintenance plan, The Framework for Maintenance and Modernization of Naval Vessels, toCongress . The maintenance plan provides a long-range look at upcoming maintenance requirements to better prepareNavy and industry partners for projected workloads. TheNavy has struggled with maintenance delays in recent years, and a significant tension exists between maintaining and modernizing the fleet. TheDoD andNavy not only face difficult tradeoffs between modernization priorities, but also tradeoffs about where to take risk across time. The shipbuilding defense industry is capital heavy and skilled labor intensive. TheNavy , a large single customer with many needs and requirements, dominates the industry's customer base and is served by an increasingly fragile supplier base that has trended toward exclusive providers. Inconsistent shipbuilding plans and annual funding uncertainty severely degrade the ability of shipyards to conduct long-term planning and respond to near-term changes in requirements. This ultimately results in longer construction times and increased costs. For example, the high operational tempo of theNavy in recent years has resulted in a backlog of repair work across the fleet. Coupled with the impacts of COVID-19 and increases in new ship construction, many suppliers are experiencing a shortfall in their capacity to perform work and manufacture products. This increased demand is applying stress to already-aging production equipment. The combination of limited suppliers and an increase in workload could increase cost and potentially create schedule slips, impacting American warfighting capability. Ultimately, a balance will need to be achieved between the competing priorities of upgrading legacy systems for the near-term, developing and procuring the next generation of systems for the mid-term, and investing in emerging technologies that could drive game-changing capabilities in the long-term. Additionally, theU.S. Navy must compete with other budget priorities, including other defense activities, non-defense discretionary spending, supplemental spending for COVID-19 relief and natural disasters, entitlement programs, and other mandatory spending, for a share of federal budget funding. While the impact to our business resulting from these developments remains uncertain, they could have a material impact on current programs, as well as new business opportunities with theDoD . See Risk Factors in Item 1A.
Program Descriptions
For convenience, a brief description of certain programs discussed in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K is included in the Glossary of Programs.
CONTRACTS
We generate most of our revenues from long-termU.S. Government contracts for the production of goods and services. Government contracts typically include the following cost elements: direct material, labor and subcontracting costs, and certain indirect costs, including allowable general and administrative expenses. Unless otherwise specified in a contract, costs billed to contracts with theU.S. Government are treated as allowable and allocable costs under the FAR and CAS regulations. Examples of costs incurred by us that are not allowable under the FAR and CAS regulations include certain legal costs, lobbying costs, charitable donations, interest expense, organizational costs, including certain merger and acquisition costs, and advertising costs. We monitor our policies and procedures with respect to our contracts on a regular basis to ensure consistent application under similar terms and conditions, as well as compliance with all applicable government regulations. In addition, the DCAA routinely audits the costs we incur that are allocated toU.S. Government contracts.
Our contracts typically fall into one of four categories: firm fixed-price,
fixed-price incentive, cost-type, and time and materials. See Note 7: Revenue in
Item 8.
•Firm Fixed-Price Contracts - A firm fixed-price contract is a contract in which
the specified scope of work is agreed to for a price that is predetermined by
bid or negotiation and not generally subject to adjustment regardless of costs
incurred by the contractor.
•Fixed-Price Incentive Contracts - Fixed-price incentive contracts provide for
reimbursement of the contractor's allowable costs, but are subject to a
cost-share limit that affects profitability. Fixed-price incentive contracts
effectively become firm fixed-price contracts once the cost-share limit is
reached.
32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
•Cost-Type Contracts - Cost-type contracts provide for reimbursement of the
contractor's allowable costs plus a fee that represents profit. Cost-type
contracts generally require that the contractor use its reasonable efforts to
accomplish the scope of the work within some specified time and some stated
dollar limitation.
•Time and Materials - Time and materials contracts specify a fixed hourly
billing rate for each direct labor hour expended and reimbursement for allowable
material costs and expenses.
Contract Fees - Negotiated contract fee structures include: fixed fee amounts, cost sharing arrangements to reward or penalize contractors for under- or over-cost target performance, respectively, positive award fees, and negative penalty arrangements. Profit margins may vary materially depending on the negotiated contract fee arrangements, percentage-of-completion of the contract, the achievement of performance objectives, and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is finally determined. Award Fees - Certain contracts contain award fees based on performance criteria such as cost, schedule, quality, and technical performance. Award fees are determined and earned based on an evaluation by the customer of our performance against such negotiated criteria. We consider award fees to be variable consideration and generally include these fees in the transaction price using a most likely amount approach. Award fees are limited to the extent of funding allotted by the customer and available for performance and those amounts for which a significant reversal of revenue is not probable.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, ESTIMATES, AND JUDGMENTS
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance withU.S. GAAP, which requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Management considers an accounting policy to be critical if it is important to our financial condition and results of operations and requires significant judgment and estimates by management in its application. The development and selection of these critical accounting policies have been determined by our management. We have reviewed our critical accounting policies and estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors. Due to the significant judgment involved in selecting certain of the assumptions used in these policies, it is possible that different parties could choose different assumptions and reach different conclusions. While we base estimates and assumptions on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions. We consider our policies relating to the following matters to involve our most critical accounting policies and estimates:
•Revenue recognition;
•Purchase accounting, goodwill, and intangible assets;
•Litigation, commitments, and contingencies;
•Retirement related benefit plans; and
•Workers' compensation.
Revenue Recognition
Most of our revenues are derived from long-term contracts for the production of goods and services provided to theU.S. Government , which are generally accounted for by recognizing revenues over time using a cost-to-cost measure of progress. In estimating contract costs, we utilize a profit-booking rate based upon performance expectations that incorporate a number of assumptions and estimates regarding risks related to technical requirements, feasibility, schedule, and contract costs. Management performs periodic reviews of the contracts to evaluate the underlying risks, which may increase the profit-booking rate as we are able to mitigate and retire such risks. For the impacts of changes in estimates on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, see Note 8: Segment Information in Item 8.
Purchase Accounting,
We allocate the purchase price of acquired businesses to the underlying tangible
and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their
respective fair values, with the excess recorded as goodwill. We recognize
purchased intangible assets from our business acquisitions at fair value on the
acquisition date. Our most significant
33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
purchased intangible assets are generally related to customer contracts,
including backlog and recompeted contracts. We determine the fair values of
those customer related intangible assets based on estimates and judgments,
including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth
rates, and discount rates.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis at each of our reporting units by assessing qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of other intangible asset or the goodwill allocated to the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment indicates a possible impairment, the carrying value of the asset or reporting unit is compared with its fair value. If the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, we record an impairment charge to the reporting unit. We perform tests for impairment of amortizable intangible assets whenever events or circumstances suggest that amortizable intangible assets may be impaired. We estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and market-based valuation methodologies. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgments about projected revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital expenditures, and cash flows over a multi-year period. The discount rate applied to our forecasts of future cash flows is based on our estimated weighted average cost of capital. In assessing the reasonableness of our determined fair values, we evaluate our results against our market capitalization. Impairment assessment inherently involves management judgments as to assumptions about expected future cash flows and the impact of market conditions on those assumptions. Changes in our estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. For further information on purchase accounting, goodwill, and intangible assets, see Risk Factors in Item 1A and Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 4: Acquisitions and Divestitures, and Note 11:Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in Item 8.
Litigation, Commitments, and Contingencies
Overview - We are subject to a range of legal proceedings before various courts
and administrative agencies and are periodically subject to government audits,
inquiries, and investigations that arise in the ordinary course of business.
Estimating liabilities and costs associated with these matters requires judgment
and assessment based upon professional knowledge and the experience of
management and our internal and external legal counsel. In accordance with our
practices relating to accounting for contingencies, we record charges to
earnings when we determine, after taking into consideration the facts and
circumstances of each matter, including any settlement offers, that it is
probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. The ultimate resolution of any such exposure may vary from
earlier estimates as further facts and circumstances become known.
Environmental Accruals - We are subject to the environmental laws and
regulations of the jurisdictions in which we conduct operations. We record a
liability for the costs of expected environmental remediation obligations when
we determine that it is probable we will incur such costs and the amount of the
liability can be reasonably estimated. When a range of costs is possible and no
amount within that range is a better estimate than another, we record the
minimum amount of the range.
Factors that could result in changes to the assessment of probability, range of
estimated costs, and environmental liability accruals include: modification of
planned remedial actions, increase or decrease in the estimated time required to
remediate, discovery of more extensive contamination than anticipated, results
of efforts to involve other legally responsible parties, financial insolvency of
other responsible parties, changes in laws and regulations or contractual
obligations affecting remediation requirements, and improvements in remediation
technology. Although we cannot predict whether new information gained as
remediation projects progress will materially affect the accrued liability, we
do not believe that future remediation expenditures will have a material effect
on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Income Tax Matters - The evaluation of tax positions taken in a filed tax
return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return or claim, requires
judgment. We establish reserves for uncertain tax positions that do not meet the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, based on the merits of the position.
We recognize the amount of a tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be
realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. If a tax
position
34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties, we
recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax
position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return. Penalties and
accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized as a
component of income tax expense. See Note 12: Income Taxes in Item 8. Changes in
accruals associated with unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in earnings in
the period they are determined.
For further information on litigation, commitments, and contingencies, see Risk
Factors in Item 1A and Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note
4: Acquisitions and Divestitures, Note 12: Income Taxes, Note 14:
Investigations, Claims, and Litigation, and Note 16: Commitments and
Contingencies in Item 8.
Retirement Related Benefit Plans
We recognize, on a plan-by-plan basis, the funded status of our retirement related benefit plans as an asset or liability on our balance sheet, with corresponding adjustments to after-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss and deferred tax assets or liabilities. The funded status represents the difference between the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets. See Note 17: Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits in Item 8. We calculate our retirement related benefit plan costs under both CAS andU.S. GAAP Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS"). The calculations under CAS and FAS require significant judgment. CAS prescribes the determination, allocation, and recovery of retirement related benefit plan costs onU.S. Government contracts through the pricing of products and services. FAS prescribes the methodology used to determine retirement related benefit plan expense or income, as well as the liability, for financial reporting purposes. The CAS requirements for these costs and their calculation methodologies differ from FAS. As a result, while both CAS and FAS use assumptions in their calculation methodologies, each method results in different calculated amounts of retirement related benefit plan costs. We recover our CAS costs through the pricing of products and services onU.S. Government contracts, so that the CAS cost is recognized in segment product sales and service revenues and in the costs of those product sales and service revenues. In order to present our consolidated financial statements in accordance with FAS, we record the difference between our FAS expense and CAS cost ("FAS/CAS Adjustment") as operating income within segment operating income and non-operating retirement benefit (expense). The minimum funding requirements for our qualified pension plans are determined under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), which is primarily based on the year's expected service cost and amortization of other previously unfunded liabilities. EffectiveJanuary 1, 2011 , we were subject to the funding requirements under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 ("PPA"), which amended ERISA. Under the PPA, we are required to fully fund our pension plans over a rolling seven-year period as determined annually based upon the funded status at the beginning of each year. PPA also introduced a variety of benefit restrictions that apply if a plan falls below certain funded percentages, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. In funding our plans, we consider various factors, including the minimum funding requirements, the funded status needed to avoid potential benefit restrictions and other adverse consequences, minimum CAS funding requirements, and the current and anticipated funding levels of each plan.
Effective
determining CAS pension costs. The interest rates used to calculate pension
liabilities under CAS are consistent with those used in the determination of
minimum funding requirements under ERISA.
Pension funding requirements under ERISA are subject to pension relief for plan sponsors in the form of higher interest rate assumptions introduced by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and subsequently extended by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Using these minimum funding interest rates for the purposes of determining pension costs under CAS reduces volatility in CAS costs year-over-year and provides more predictable costs for our customers, while better aligning reimbursements of pension costs under our contracts with our required pension plan contributions under ERISA. Due to the differences in requirements and calculation methodologies between FAS and CAS, our FAS pension expense is not necessarily indicative of the funding requirements under PPA or the amounts we recover from theU.S. Government under CAS. 35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumptions - We account for our retirement related benefit plans on the accrual basis under FAS. The measurements of obligations, costs, assets, and liabilities require significant judgment. We annually review our assumptions, which are set at each year end and generally not changed during the following year unless a major plan event occurs, such as an amendment, curtailment, or settlement that would trigger a remeasurement. The key assumptions in these measurements are the interest rate used to discount future benefit payments and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Discount Rate - The assumed discount rate under FAS is used to determine the retirement related benefit plan obligations and expense, and represents the hypothetical rate at which plan benefit obligations could be effectively settled at the measurement date. Consequently, the discount rate can be volatile from year to year. The discount rate assumption is determined for each plan by constructing a hypothetical portfolio of high-quality bonds with cash flows that match the estimated outflows for future benefit payments to determine a single equivalent discount rate. Benefit payments are not only contingent on the terms of a plan but also on the underlying participant demographics, including current age and assumed mortality. We use only bonds that are denominated inU.S. Dollars, are rated Aa or better by nationally recognized statistical rating agencies, have a minimum outstanding issue of$50 million as of the measurement date, and are not callable, convertible, or index-linked. Expected Long-Term Rate of Return - The expected long-term rate of return on assets is used to calculate net periodic expense, based on such factors as historical returns, targeted asset allocations, investment policy, duration, expected future long-term performance of individual asset classes, interest rates, inflation, portfolio volatility, investment management and administrative fees, and risk management strategies. Historical plan asset performance alone has inherent limitations in predicting future returns. While studies are helpful in understanding past and current trends and performance, the rate of return assumption is based more on long-term prospective views to avoid short-term market influences. Unless plan assets and benefit obligations are subject to re-measurement during the year, the expected return on pension assets is based on the fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year. Mortality - Mortality assumptions are used to determine the retirement related benefit obligations and expense, and represent the likelihood and duration of benefit payments to plan participants based on historical experience and projected longevity. We periodically update our mortality assumptions as circumstances warrant. Differences arising from actual experience or changes in assumptions might materially affect retirement related benefit plan obligations and the funded status. Actuarial gains and losses arising from differences between assumptions and actual experience or changes in assumptions are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss. This unrecognized amount is amortized as a component of net expense to the extent it exceeds 10% of the greater of the plan's benefit obligation or plan assets. The amortization period for actuarial gains and losses is the estimated average remaining service life of the plan participants. In 2022, the actual return on assets was approximately (16.1)%, which was less than the expected return assumption of 7.25%. For the year endedDecember 31, 2022 , the weighted average discount rates for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans increased by 247 and 256 basis points, respectively. The differences in asset returns resulted in an actuarial loss of$1,943 million , and the differences in discount rates resulted in an actuarial gain of$2,605 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 . An increase or decrease of 25 basis points in the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return assumptions would have had the following approximate impacts on pension expense and obligations: Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease) in December 31, 2022 ($ in millions) in 2023 Expense Obligations 25 basis point decrease in discount rate $ 16 $ 197 25 basis point increase in discount rate (6) (188) 25 basis point decrease in expected return on assets 17 25 basis point increase in expected return on assets (17) Assuming an 8.00% expected return on assets assumption, a$50 million pension plan contribution is generally expected to favorably impact the current year expected return on assets by approximately$2 million , depending on the timing of the contribution. 36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sensitivities to assumptions are not necessarily linear and are specific to the
time periods noted.
CAS Cost - In addition to providing the methodology for calculating retirement
related benefit plan costs, CAS also prescribes the method for assigning those
costs to specific periods. While the ultimate liability for such costs under FAS
and CAS is similar, the pattern of cost recognition is different. The key
drivers of CAS pension cost include the funded status and the method used to
calculate CAS reimbursement for each of our plans. A plan's CAS pension cost can
only be allocated until the plan is fully funded as defined under the CAS
requirements.
Other FAS and CAS Pension Considerations - A key driver of the difference
between FAS expense and CAS cost (and consequently the FAS/CAS Adjustment) is
the pattern of earnings and expense recognition for actuarial gains and losses
that arise when our asset and liability experiences differ from our assumptions
under each set of requirements. Under FAS, our net actuarial gains and losses
exceeding the 10% corridor are amortized over the estimated average remaining
service life of the plan participants. Under CAS Harmonization, the amortization
period is 10 years for actuarial gains and losses. Both FAS and CAS use a
"market-related value" of plan assets approach to calculate the amount of
deferred asset gains or losses to be amortized. Under CAS, actual asset gains
and losses are systematically smoothed over five years, subject to certain
limitations. For FAS, we do not use this smoothing method, and instead use fair
value in determining our FAS expense. Accordingly, FAS expense generally
reflects recent asset gains and losses sooner than CAS.
Additionally, CAS cost is only recognized for plans that are not fully funded as
defined under CAS. If a plan becomes or ceases to be fully funded due to our
asset or liability experience, our CAS cost will change accordingly.
Retirement Plan Assets - Retirement plan assets are stated at fair value.
Investments in equity securities (common and preferred) are valued at the last
reported sales price when an active market exists. Investments in fixed-income
securities are generally valued based on market transactions for comparable
securities and various relationships between securities that are generally
recognized by institutional traders. Investments in hedge funds, real estate
investment funds, private partnerships, collective trust funds, and commingled
funds are generally valued at their Net Asset Values ("NAV") or equivalent,
which are based on the current fair values of the fund's underlying assets.
Management reviews independently appraised values, audited financial statements,
and additional pricing information to evaluate the NAV or its equivalent.
For the limited group of investments for which market quotations are not readily available or for which the above valuation procedures are deemed not to reflect fair value, additional information is obtained from the investment manager and evaluated internally to determine whether any adjustments are required to reflect fair value. See Note 17: Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits in Item 8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss - Changes in assumptions and changes to plan assets and benefit obligations due to differences between actuarial assumptions and actual results are reported as actuarial gains and losses and recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, along with unrecognized prior service costs arising from plan amendments. As disclosed in Note 17: Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits in Item 8, net pre-tax unrecognized actuarial losses as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021 were$678 million and$1,194 million , respectively. The decrease in actuarial losses in 2022 was primarily driven by lower benefit obligations of$2,605 million resulting from higher discount rates used to determine benefit obligations and amortization of previously unrecognized actuarial losses of$32 million , partially offset by asset returns less than expected returns of$1,943 million . Net pre-tax unrecognized prior service costs (credits) as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021 were$140 million and$60 million , respectively. These net deferred costs (credits) primarily originated from plan amendments, including those resulting from collective bargaining agreements. The change in unrecognized prior service costs (credits) in 2022 resulted from plan amendments and the amortization of previously accumulated prior service costs (credits).
Workers' Compensation
Our operations are subject to federal and state workers' compensation laws. We
maintain self-insured workers' compensation plans and participate in federally
administered second injury workers' compensation funds. We estimate the
liability for such claims and funding requirements on a discounted basis
utilizing actuarial methods based on various assumptions, which include our
historical loss experience and projected loss development factors. We
periodically, and at least annually, update our assumptions based on an
actuarial analysis. For further
37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
information on workers' compensation, see Environmental, Health & Safety in Item
1 and Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies in Item 8.
Accounting Standards Updates
See Note 3: Accounting Standards Updates in Item 8 for further information.
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
The following table presents selected financial highlights:
Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Sales and service revenues$ 10,676 $ 9,524 $ 9,361 $ 1,152 12 %$ 163 2 % Cost of product sales and service revenues 9,236 8,156 7,691 1,080 13 % 465 6 % Income from operating investments, net 48 41 32 7 17 % 9 28 % Other income and gains, net 1 2 1 (1) (50) % 1 100 % General and administrative expenses 924 898 904 26 3 % (6) (1) % Operating income 565 513 799 52 10 % (286) (36) % Interest expense (102) (89) (114) (13) (15) % 25 22 % Non-operating retirement benefit 276 181 119 95 52 % 62 52 % Other, net (20) 17 6 (37) (218) % 11 183 % Federal and foreign income taxes 140 78 114 62 79 % (36) (32) % Net earnings$ 579 $ 544 $ 696 $ 35 6 %$ (152) (22) %
Operating Performance Assessment and Reporting
We manage and assess the performance of our business based on our performance on individual contracts and programs using the financial measures referred to below, with consideration given to the Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates, and Judgments referred to in this section. Our portfolio of long-term contracts is largely flexibly-priced. Therefore, sales tend to fluctuate in concert with costs across our large portfolio of active contracts, with operating income being a critical measure of operating performance. Under FAR rules that govern our business with theU.S. Government , most types of costs are allowable, and we do not focus on individual cost groupings, such as cost of sales or general and administrative expenses, as much as we do on total contract costs, which are a key factor in determining contract operating income. As a result, in evaluating our operating performance, we look primarily at changes in sales and service revenues, as well as operating income, including the effects of significant changes in operating income as a result of changes in contract financial estimates and the use of the cumulative catch-up method of accounting in accordance with GAAP. This approach is consistent with the long-term life cycle of our contracts, as management assesses the bidding of each contract by focusing on net sales and operating profit and monitors performance in a similar manner through contract completion. Consequently, our discussion of business segment performance focuses on net sales and operating profit, consistent with our approach for managing our business. Cost of sales for both product sales and service revenues consists of materials, labor, and subcontracting costs, as well as an allocation of indirect costs for overhead. We manage the type and amount of costs at the contract level, which is the basis for estimating our total costs at completion of our contracts. Unusual fluctuations in operating performance driven by changes in a specific cost element across multiple contracts are described in our analysis. 38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sales and Service Revenues
Sales and service revenues were comprised as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars
Percent Product sales$ 7,283 $ 7,000 $ 6,850 $ 283 4 % $ 150 2 % Service revenues 3,393 2,524 2,511 869 34 % 13 1 % Sales and service revenues$ 10,676 $ 9,524 $ 9,361 $ 1,152 12 % $ 163 2 % 2022 - Product sales in 2022 increased$283 million , or 4%, from 2021. Product sales at our Ingalls segment increased$15 million in 2022, primarily as a result of higher volumes in amphibious assault ships and surface combatants, partially offset by lower volumes in the Legend class NSC program.Newport News product sales increased$278 million in 2022, primarily as a result of higher volumes in aircraft carriers and submarines. Mission Technologies product sales decreased$10 million in 2022, primarily as a result of lower volumes in mission based solutions, unmanned systems, and fleet sustainment. Service revenues in 2022 increased$869 million , or 34%, from 2021. Service revenues at our Ingalls segment increased$30 million in 2022, primarily as a result of higher volumes in amphibious assault ship services. Service revenues at ourNewport News segment decreased$83 million in 2022, primarily as a result of lower volumes in aircraft carrier, submarine and naval nuclear support services. Service revenues at our Mission Technologies segment increased$922 million in 2022, primarily as a result of higher volumes in mission based solutions services due to the acquisition of Alion in 2021. 2021 - Product sales in 2021 increased$150 million , or 2%, from 2020. Product sales at our Ingalls segment decreased$105 million in 2021, primarily as a result of lower volumes in the Legend class NSC program and amphibious assault ships, partially offset by higher volumes in surface combatants.Newport News product sales increased$231 million in 2021, primarily as a result of higher volumes in submarines and aircraft carriers. Mission Technologies product sales increased$24 million in 2021, primarily as a result of higher volumes in mission based solutions, partially offset by lower volumes in unmanned systems. Service revenues in 2021 increased$13 million , or 1%, from 2020. Service revenues at our Ingalls segment decreased$56 million in 2021, primarily as a result of lower volumes in surface combatants and amphibious assault ship services. Service revenues at ourNewport News segment decreased$138 million in 2021, primarily as a result of lower volumes in naval nuclear support services. Service revenues at our Mission Technologies segment increased$207 million in 2021, primarily as a result of higher volumes in mission based solutions services due to the acquisition of Alion, partially offset by the divestiture of our oil and gas business and contribution of ourSan Diego Shipyard to a joint venture. Cost of Sales and Service Revenues
Cost of product sales, cost of service revenues, income from operating
investments, net, and general and administrative expenses were as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent
Dollars Percent Cost of product sales$ 6,225 $ 5,958 $ 5,621 $ 267 4 % $ 337 6 % % of product sales 85.5 % 85.1 % 82.1 % Cost of service revenues 3,011 2,198 2,070 813 37 % 128 6 % % of service revenues 88.7 % 87.1 % 82.4 % Income from operating investments, net 48 41 32 7 17 % 9 28 % Other income and gains, net 1 2 1 (1) (50) % 1 100 % General and administrative expenses 924 898 904 26 3 % (6) (1) % % of total sales and service revenues 8.7 % 9.4 %
9.7 %
Cost of sales and service revenues$ 10,111 $ 9,011 $ 8,562 $ 1,100 12 % $ 449 5 % 39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost of Product Sales
2022 - Cost of product sales in 2022 increased$267 million , or 4%, compared to 2021. Cost of product sales at our Ingalls segment increased$46 million in 2022, primarily as a result of volume increases described above and receipt of a contract incentive on USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125) in 2021. Cost of product sales at ourNewport News segment increased$241 million in 2022, primarily as a result of volume increases described above. Cost of product sales at our Mission Technologies segment decreased$12 million in 2022, primarily as a result of volume decreases described above and year-to-year variances in contract mix. Cost of product sales related to the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment decreased$8 million from 2021 to 2022. Cost of product sales as a percentage of product sales increased from 85.1% in 2021 to 85.5% in 2022, primarily due to lower risk retirement on theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and the RCOH of USS George Washington (CVN 73), and receipt of a contract incentive on USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125) in 2021, partially offset by favorable changes in contract estimates from facilities capital and price adjustment clauses, contract incentives on theColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine program, higher risk retirement onHarrisburg (LPD 30) and USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28), as well as a favorable change in the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment. 2021 - Cost of product sales in 2021 increased$337 million , or 6%, compared to 2020. Cost of product sales at our Ingalls segment decreased$82 million in 2021, primarily as a result of the volume changes described above. Cost of product sales at ourNewport News segment increased$65 million in 2021, primarily as a result of submarine volume increases described above, partially offset by impacts related to the performance on Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and delay and disruption from discrete COVID-19 Events in 2020. Cost of product sales at our Mission Technologies segment increased$20 million in 2021, primarily due to the higher volumes described above. Cost of product sales related to the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment increased$334 million from 2020 to 2021. Cost of product sales as a percentage of product sales increased from 82.1% in 2020 to 85.1% in 2021, primarily due to an unfavorable change in the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment, lower risk retirement on USS Delbert D. Black (DDG 119), and year-to-year variances in contract mix, partially offset by impacts related to performance on Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and delay and disruption from discrete COVID-19 Events in 2020, higher risk retirement on Bougainville (LHA 8), and a contract incentive onJack H. Lucas (DDG 125). Cost of Service Revenues 2022 - Cost of service revenues in 2022 increased$813 million , or 37%, compared to 2021. Cost of service revenues at our Ingalls segment increased$30 million in 2022, primarily as a result of higher volumes described above. Cost of service revenues at ourNewport News segment decreased$83 million in 2022, primarily as a result of lower volumes described above. Cost of service revenues at our Mission Technologies segment increased$870 million in 2022, primarily as a result of higher volumes described above. Cost of service revenues related to the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment decreased$4 million from 2021 to 2022.
Cost of service revenues as a percentage of service revenues increased from
87.1% in 2021 to 88.7% in 2022, primarily driven by higher amortization of
purchased intangible assets in 2022 due to the Alion acquisition, partially
offset by higher operating income driven by the acquisition of Alion in 2021 and
a favorable change in the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment.
2021 - Cost of service revenues in 2021 increased$128 million , or 6%, compared to 2020. Cost of service revenues at our Ingalls segment decreased$46 million in 2021, primarily as a result of the lower volumes described above. Cost of service revenues at ourNewport News segment decreased$74 million in 2021, primarily as a result of lower volumes described above. Cost of service revenues at our Mission Technologies segment increased$177 million in 2021, primarily as a result of higher volumes changes described above. Cost of service revenues related to the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment increased$71 million from 2020 to 2021.
Cost of service revenues as a percentage of service revenues increased from
82.4% in 2020 to 87.1% in 2021, primarily driven by an unfavorable change in the
Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment, lower risk retirement on submarine support
services, and year-to-year variances in contract mix.
40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income from Operating Investments, Net
The activities of our operating investments are closely aligned with the
operations of the segments holding the investments. We therefore record income
related to earnings from equity method investments in our operating income.
2022 - Income from operating investments, net increased$7 million , or 17%, to$48 million in 2022 from$41 million in 2021. The increase resulted from higher equity income from our investment in an unconsolidated ship repair and specialty fabrication joint venture. 2021 - Income from operating investments, net increased$9 million , or 28%, to$41 million in 2021 from$32 million in 2020. The increase resulted from higher equity income from our investment in an unconsolidated ship repair and specialty fabrication joint venture and from our unconsolidated nuclear and environmental joint ventures.
General and Administrative Expenses
In accordance with industry practice and the regulations that govern the cost accounting requirements for government contracts, most general and administrative expenses are considered allowable and allocable costs on government contracts. These costs are allocated to contracts in progress on a systematic basis, and contract performance factors include this cost component as an element of cost. 2022 - General and administrative expenses in 2022 increased$26 million , or 3%, compared to 2021. This increase was primarily due to higher overhead costs as a result of the acquisition of Alion in 2021 and current state income tax expense, partially offset by favorable changes in non-current state income tax expense. 2021 - General and administrative expenses in 2021 decreased$6 million , or 1%, compared to 2020. This decrease was primarily driven by favorable changes in current state income tax expense, partially offset by unfavorable changes in non-current state income tax expense and higher overhead costs driven by the acquisition of Alion. Operating Income We consider operating income an important measure for evaluating our operating performance, and, consistent with industry practice, we define operating income as revenues less the related costs of producing the revenues and general and administrative expenses. We internally manage our operations by reference to "segment operating income," which is defined as operating income before the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment and non-current state income taxes, neither of which affects segment performance. Segment operating income is not a recognized measure under GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance, investors should use segment operating income in addition to, and not as an alternative for, operating income or any other performance measure presented in accordance with GAAP. It is a measure we use to evaluate our core operating performance. We believe segment operating income reflects an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results, provides a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. We believe the measure is used by investors and is a useful indicator to measure our performance. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of segment operating income may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The following table reconciles operating income to segment operating income: Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars
Percent
Operating income$ 565 $ 513 $ 799 $ 52 10 %$ (286) (36) % Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment 145 157 (248) (12) (8) % 405 163 % Non-current state income taxes 2 13 4 (11) (85) % 9 225 % Segment operating income$ 712 $ 683 $ 555 $ 29 4 %$ 128 23 % 41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Operating Income
2022 - Segment operating income in 2022 was$712 million , compared to$683 million in 2021. The increase was primarily due to favorable changes in contract estimates from facilities capital and price adjustment clauses, contract incentives on theColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine program, higher risk retirement onHarrisburg (LPD 30) and USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28), higher operating income driven by the acquisition of Alion in 2021, and higher equity income from our investment in an unconsolidated ship repair and specialty fabrication joint venture, partially offset by higher amortization of purchased intangible assets in 2022 due to the Alion acquisition, lower risk retirement on theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and the RCOH of USS GeorgeWashington (CVN 73), and receipt of a contract incentive on USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125) in 2021. 2021 - Segment operating income in 2021 was$683 million , compared to$555 million in 2020. The increase was driven by impacts related to performance on Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and delay and disruption from discrete COVID-19 Events in 2020.
Activity within each segment is discussed under Segment Operating Results below.
FAS/CAS Adjustment and Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment
The FAS/CAS Adjustment reflects the difference between expenses for pension and other postretirement benefits determined in accordance with GAAP and the expenses for these items included in segment operating income in accordance with CAS. The Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment excludes the following components of net periodic benefit costs: interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service cost (credit) and actuarial loss (gain), and settlement and curtailment effects. EffectiveJanuary 1, 2021 , we adopted the Safe Harbor methodology for determining CAS pension costs. Under this methodology, the interest rates used to calculate pension liabilities under CAS are consistent with those used in the determination of minimum funding requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").
The components of the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment were as follows:
Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars Percent FAS benefit (expense)$ 86 $ (28) $ (70) $ 114 407 % $ 42 60 % CAS cost 45 52 437 (7) (13) % (385) (88) % FAS/CAS Adjustment 131 24 367 107 446 % (343) (93) % Non-operating retirement benefit (276) (181) (119) (95) (52) % (62) (52) % Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment (expense) benefit$ (145) $ (157) $ 248 $ 12 8 %$ (405) (163) %
2022 - The Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment in 2022 was a net expense of
million
was primarily driven by higher interest rates under FAS.
2021 - The Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment in 2021 was a net expense of
million
change was primarily driven by the more immediate recognition of higher interest
rates under CAS.
We expect the FAS/CAS Adjustment in 2023 to be a net benefit of approximately$81 million (($31) million FAS and$50 million CAS), primarily driven by higher interest rates offset by 2022 asset returns. We expect the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment in 2023 to be a net expense of approximately$68 million ($118 million FAS and$50 million CAS), primarily driven by the more immediate recognition of higher interest rates under FAS. The expected FAS/CAS Adjustment is subject to change during 2023, when we remeasure our actuarial estimate of the unfunded benefit obligation for CAS with updated census data and other items later in the year. 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-current State Income Taxes
Non-current state income taxes include deferred state income taxes, which reflect the change in deferred state tax assets and liabilities, and the tax expense or benefit associated with changes in state unrecognized tax benefits in the relevant period. These amounts are recorded within operating income. Current period state income tax expense is charged to contract costs and included in cost of sales and service revenues in segment operating income. 2022 - Non-current state income tax expense in 2022 was$2 million , compared to$13 million in 2021. The favorable change in non-current state income taxes was primarily driven by a decrease in deferred state income tax expense, largely attributable to research and development expenses that are capitalized and amortized for tax purposes. 2021 - Non-current state income tax expense in 2021 was$13 million , compared to$4 million in 2020. The unfavorable change in non-current state income taxes was driven by an increase in deferred state income tax expense, primarily attributable to a decrease in expenses not currently deductible for income tax purposes. Interest Expense
2022 - Interest expense in 2022 was
2021. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of senior notes and
borrowing under the Term Loan in 2021 to partially fund the Alion acquisition.
2021 - Interest expense in 2021 was$89 million , compared to$114 million in 2020. The decrease was primarily a result of costs associated with the early redemption in 2020 of$600 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.000% senior notes due 2025, partially offset by increased borrowing to fund the acquisition of Alion with the issuance of$400 million aggregate principal amount of 0.670% senior notes due 2023,$600 million aggregate principal amount of 2.043% senior notes due 2028, and a$650 million three-year Term Loan.
Non-Operating Retirement Benefit
The non-operating retirement benefit includes the following components of net
periodic benefit costs: interest cost, expected return on plan assets,
amortization of prior service cost (credit) and actuarial loss (gain), and
settlement and curtailment effects.
2022 - A favorable change in the non-operating retirement benefit of
from 2021 to 2022 was primarily driven by higher 2021 returns on plan assets.
2021 - A favorable change in the non-operating retirement benefit of
from 2020 to 2021 was primarily driven by higher 2020 returns on plan assets.
Other, Net
2022 - Other, net expense in 2022 was
of
unrealized net investment losses.
2021 - Other, net income in 2021 was$17 million , compared to$6 million with 2020. The increase was primarily driven by an impairment of a loan receivable in 2020.
Federal and Foreign Income Taxes
2022 - Our effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations was 19.5%
in 2022, compared to 12.5% in 2021. The increase in our effective tax rate for
2022 was primarily attributable to income tax benefits recorded in 2021 relating
to research and development tax credits for prior periods and a tax loss
associated with the sale of our oil and gas business.
2021 - Our effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations was 12.5%
in 2021, compared to 14.1% in 2020. The decrease in our effective tax rate for
2021 was primarily attributable to an increase in research and development tax
credits for prior periods and a tax loss associated with the sale of our oil and
gas business, partially offset by an increase in unrecognized tax benefits.
43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEGMENT OPERATING RESULTS
Basis of Presentation
We are aligned into three reportable segments: Ingalls,
Mission Technologies.
The following table presents segment operating results:
Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020
($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
Sales and Service Revenues
Ingalls $ 2,570 $ 2,528 $ 2,678 $ 42 2 % $ (150) (6) %
Newport News 5,852 5,663 5,571 189 3 % 92 2 %
Mission Technologies 2,387 1,476 1,268 911 62 % 208 16 %
Intersegment eliminations (133) (143) (156) 10 7 % 13 8 %
Sales and service revenues $ 10,676 $ 9,524
$ 9,361 $ 1,152 12 %$ 163 2 % Operating Income Ingalls$ 292 $ 281 $ 281 $ 11 4 % $ - - % Newport News 357 352 233 5 1 % 119 51 % Mission Technologies 63 50 41 13 26 % 9 22 % Segment operating income 712 683 555 29 4 % 128 23 % Non-segment factors affecting operating income Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment (145) (157) 248 12 8 % (405) (163) % Non-current state income taxes (2) (13) (4) 11 85 % (9) (225) % Operating income$ 565 $ 513 $ 799 $ 52 10 %$ (286) (36) %
KEY SEGMENT FINANCIAL MEASURES
Sales and Service Revenues
Period-to-period revenues reflect performance under new and ongoing contracts.
Changes in sales and service revenues are typically expressed in terms of
volume. Unless otherwise described, volume generally refers to increases (or
decreases) in reported revenues due to varying production activity levels,
delivery rates, or service levels on individual contracts. Volume changes will
typically carry a corresponding income change based on the profit margin rate
for a particular contract.
Segment Operating Income
Segment operating income reflects the aggregate performance results of contracts
within a segment. Excluded from this measure are certain costs not directly
associated with contract performance, such as the Operating FAS/CAS Adjustment
and non-current state income taxes. Changes in segment operating income are
typically expressed in terms of volume, as discussed above, or performance.
Performance refers to changes in contract profit margin rates. These changes
typically relate to profit recognition associated with revisions to estimated
costs at completion ("EAC") that reflect improved or deteriorated operating
performance on that contract. Operating income changes are accounted for on a
cumulative to date basis at the time an EAC change is recorded. Segment
operating income may also be affected by, among other things, contract
performance, the effects of workforce stoppages, the effects of natural
disasters such as hurricanes, resolution of disputed items with the customer,
recovery of insurance proceeds, and other discrete events. At the completion of
a long-term contract, any originally estimated costs not incurred or reserves
not fully utilized, such as warranty reserves, could also impact contract
earnings. Where such items have occurred and the effects are material, a
separate description is provided.
44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative Adjustments
For the years ended
cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments were as follows:
Year Ended December 31 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Gross favorable adjustments$ 325 $ 244 $ 244 Gross unfavorable adjustments (212) (129) (273) Net adjustments$ 113 $ 115 $ (29) 2022 - Favorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments included contract incentives on theColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine program and higher risk retirement on USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28), Bougainville (LHA 8), andHarrisburg (LPD 30). Unfavorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments included lower risk retirement on theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program, the RCOH of USS George Washington (CVN 73), and the construction ofJohn F. Kennedy (CVN 79). 2021 - Favorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments included risk retirement on Bougainville (LHA 8), a contract incentive onJack H. Lucas (DDG 125), and risk retirement on Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28). No unfavorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments were individually significant. 2020 - Favorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments included risk retirement on USS Delbert D. Black (DDG 119) in connection with its delivery and a capital expenditure contract incentive, naval nuclear support services, theSan Antonio class (LPD 17) program, and other individually insignificant adjustments. Unfavorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments were primarily driven by$111 million in the second quarter of 2020 on the Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program, including$95 million for cost and schedule performance and updates to our assumptions for future program efficiencies and performance as a result of cost and schedule trends. Our risk retirement assumptions on Block IV boats anticipated boat-to-boat cost and schedule improvements working down the learning curve, but performance trends, exacerbated by the COVID-19 Events, made those improvements less likely to occur. Unfavorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments on the Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program also included$16 million from delay and disruption directly attributable to COVID-19 Events due to lower employee attendance, decreased availability of critical skills, and out-of-sequence work. Unfavorable cumulative catch-up revenue adjustments across all programs resulting from delay and disruption cost estimates for discrete COVID-19 Events were$61 million , including$16 million in relation to the Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program discussed above. When estimates of total costs to be incurred exceed estimates of total revenue to be earned on a performance obligation related to a complex, construction-type contract, we recognize the entire loss on the performance obligation in the period the loss is determined. Ingalls Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Sales and service revenues$ 2,570 $ 2,528 $ 2,678 $ 42 2 %$ (150) (6) % Segment operating income 292 281 281 11 4 % - - % As a percentage of segment sales 11.4 % 11.1 % 10.5 % Sales and Service Revenues 2022 - Ingalls revenues, including intersegment sales, increased$42 million , or 2%, in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by higher revenues in amphibious assault ships and surface combatants, partially offset by lower revenues in the Legend class NSC program. Revenues on amphibious assault ships increased due to higher volumes onFallujah (LHA 9) andPittsburgh (LPD 31), partially offset by lower volume on USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28) following its delivery. Revenues on surface combatants increased due to higher volumes onThad Cochran (DDG 135),Sam Nunn (DDG 133), andTelesforo Trinidad (DDG 139), partially offset by lower volumes on 45 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129) and USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121). Revenues on the Legend class NSC program decreased due to lower volumes on Friedman (NSC 11) andCalhoun (NSC 10). 2021 - Ingalls revenues, including intersegment sales, decreased$150 million , or 6%, in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily driven by lower revenues in the Legend class NSC program and amphibious assault ships, partially offset by higher revenues in surface combatants. Revenues on the Legend class NSC program decreased due to lower volumes on USCGC Stone (NSC 9) following its delivery. Amphibious assault ship revenues decreased due to lower volumes on Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28),Richard M. McCool Jr . (LPD 29),Harrisburg (LPD 30), and USS Tripoli (LHA 7), partially offset by higher volumes onPittsburgh (LPD 31) andFallujah (LHA 9). Surface combatant revenues increased due to higher volumes onJack H. Lucas (DDG 125),George M. Neal (DDG 131),Jeremiah Denton (DDG 129), andSam Nunn (DDG 133), partially offset by lower volumes on USS Delbert D. Black (DDG 119) following its delivery and USS Fitzgerald (DDG 62) following its redelivery. Segment Operating Income 2022 - Ingalls segment operating income in 2022 was$292 million , compared to segment operating income of$281 million in 2021. The increase was primarily due to favorable changes in contract estimates from facilities capital and price adjustment clauses and higher risk retirement onHarrisburg (LPD 30) and USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28), partially offset by receipt of a contract incentive on USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125) in 2021. 2021 - Ingalls segment operating income in 2021 was flat compared to 2020.Newport News Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Sales and service revenues$ 5,852 $ 5,663 $ 5,571 $ 189 3 % $ 92 2 % Segment operating income 357 352 233 5 1 % 119 51 % As a percentage of segment sales 6.1 % 6.2 % 4.2 % Sales and Service Revenues 2022 -Newport News revenues, including intersegment sales, increased$189 million , or 3%, in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by higher revenues in aircraft carriers and submarines, partially offset by lower revenues in naval nuclear support services. Aircraft carrier revenues increased primarily as a result of higher volumes on the RCOH of USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) and the construction ofDoris Miller (CVN 81) and Enterprise (CVN 80), partially offset by lower volumes on the RCOH of USS George Washington (CVN 73) and USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78). Submarine revenues increased due to higher volumes on theColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine program and Block V boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program, partially offset by lower volumes on Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program. Naval nuclear support service revenues decreased primarily as a result of lower volumes in facility maintenance services, partially offset by higher volumes in submarine fleet support services. 2021 -Newport News revenues, including intersegment sales, increased$92 million , or 2%, in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily driven by higher revenues in submarines and aircraft carriers, partially offset by lower revenues in naval nuclear support services. Submarine revenues increased primarily as a result of higher volumes on Block V boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and theColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine program, partially offset by lower volumes on Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program. Aircraft carrier revenues increased primarily as a result of higher volumes on the RCOH of USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74), the construction of Enterprise (CVN 80), and the construction ofDoris Miller (CVN 81), partially offset by lower volumes on the construction ofJohn F. Kennedy (CVN 79) and the RCOH of USS George Washington (CVN 73). Naval nuclear support service revenues decreased primarily as a result of lower volumes in submarine fleet support services and facility maintenance services, partially offset by higher volumes in carrier fleet support services.
Segment Operating Income
2022 -Newport News segment operating income in 2022 was$357 million , compared to segment operating income of$352 million in 2021. The increase was primarily due to favorable changes in contract estimates from facilities 46 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- capital and price adjustment clauses and contract incentives on theColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine program, partially offset by lower risk retirement on theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and the RCOH of USS GeorgeWashington (CVN 73). 2021 -Newport News segment operating income in 2021 was$352 million , compared to segment operating income of$233 million in 2020. The increase was primarily due to impacts related to performance on Block IV boats of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program and delay and disruption from discrete COVID-19 Events in 2020. Mission Technologies Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Sales and service revenues$ 2,387 $ 1,476 $ 1,268 $ 911 62 % $ 208 16 % Segment operating income (loss) 63 50 41 13 26 % 9 22 % As a percentage of segment sales 2.6 % 3.4 % 3.2 % Sales and Service Revenues 2022 - Mission Technologies revenues, including intersegment sales, for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 , increased$911 million , or 62%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher volumes in mission based solutions attributable to the acquisition of Alion in 2021. 2021 - Mission Technologies revenues, including intersegment sales, for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , increased$208 million , or 16%, compared to 2020, primarily due to higher volumes in mission based solutions from the acquisition of Alion, partially offset by the divestiture of our oil and gas business and contribution of ourSan Diego Shipyard to a joint venture.
Segment Operating Income
2022 - Mission Technologies segment operating income for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 , was$63 million , compared to segment operating income of$50 million in 2021. The increase was primarily driven by the acquisition of Alion in 2021 and higher equity income from our investment in an unconsolidated ship repair and specialty fabrication joint venture, partially offset by higher amortization of purchased intangible assets in 2022 due to the Alion acquisition. 2021 - Mission Technologies segment operating income for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , was$50 million , compared to a segment operating income of$41 million in 2020. The increase was primarily driven by the acquisition of Alion and equity income from nuclear and environmental joint ventures, partially offset by lower performance in unmanned systems and the amortization of Alion purchased intangible assets.
BACKLOG
Total backlog as ofDecember 31, 2022 , was approximately$47.1 billion . Total backlog includes both funded backlog (firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer) and unfunded backlog (firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer). Backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity orders. For contracts having no stated contract values, backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer. 47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021: December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Total Total ($ in millions) Funded Unfunded Backlog Funded Unfunded Backlog Ingalls$ 9,231 $ 3,546 $ 12,777 $ 10,216 $ 792 $ 11,008 Newport News 11,665 17,742 29,407 11,121 21,198 32,319 Mission Technologies 1,317 3,622 4,939 1,334 3,789 5,123 Total backlog$ 22,213 $ 24,910 $ 47,123 $ 22,671 $ 25,779 $ 48,450
We expect approximately 22% of the
comprised substantially all of the backlog as of
Contract Awards
2022 - The value of new contract awards during the year ended
was approximately
2021 - The value of new contract awards during the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , was approximately$8.1 billion , comprised primarily of awards for the RCOH of USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74), construction of a 10th boat of theVirginia class (SSN 774) submarine program, and construction ofJohn F. Lehman (DDG 137).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We seek to efficiently convert operating results into cash for deployment in
operating our businesses, implementing our business strategy, and maximizing
stockholder value. We use various financial measures to assist in capital
deployment decision making, including net cash provided by operating activities
and free cash flow. We believe these measures are useful to investors in
assessing our financial performance.
The following table summarizes key components of cash flow provided by operating
activities:
Year Ended December 31 2022 over 2021 2021 over 2020
($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
Net earnings $ 579 $ 544 $ 696 $ 35 6 % $ (152) (22) %
Depreciation and amortization 366 301 254 65 22 % 47 19 %
Provision for doubtful accounts (7) 7 (1) (14) (200) % 8 800 %
Stock-based compensation 36 33 23 3 9 % 10 43 %
Deferred income taxes 2 98 23 (96) (98) % 75 326 %
Loss (gain) on investments in
marketable securities 25 (19) (17) 44 232 % (2) (12) %
Asset impairments - - 13 - - % (13) (100) %
Retiree benefits (127) (78) (176) (49) (63) % 98 56 %
Loss on early extinguishment of debt - - 21 - - % (21) (100) %
Trade working capital decrease
(increase) (108) (126) 257 18 14 % (383) (149) %
Net cash provided by operating
activities $ 766 $ 760 $ 1,093 $ 6 1 % $ (333) (30) %
We have historically maintained a capital structure comprised of a mix of equity
and debt financing. We vary our leverage both to optimize our equity return and
to pursue acquisitions. We expect to meet our current debt obligations as they
come due through internally generated funds from current levels of operations
and/or through refinancing in the debt markets prior to the maturity dates of
our debt.
Cash Flows
We discuss below our significant operating, investing, and financing activities
affecting cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
48 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Activities
2022 - Cash provided by operating activities was$766 million in 2022, compared to$760 million in 2021. The$6 million favorable change in operating cash flow was primarily due to lower contributions to retiree benefit plans and favorable changes in trade working capital, partially offset by higher income tax and interest payments. The change in trade working capital was primarily driven by the timing of receipts of accounts receivable. We expect cash generated from operations in 2023, in combination with our current cash and cash equivalents, as well as existing borrowing facilities, to be sufficient to service debt and retiree benefit plans, meet contractual obligations, and fund capital expenditures for at least the next 12 calendar months beginningJanuary 1, 2023 and beyond such 12-month period based on our current business plans. 2021 - Cash provided by operating activities was$760 million in 2021, compared to$1,093 million in 2020. The unfavorable change of$333 million in operating cash flow was primarily due to unfavorable changes in trade working capital, partially offset by lower income tax payments and lower contributions to retiree benefit plans. The change in trade working capital was primarily driven by the timing of payments of accounts payable and receipts of accounts receivable. Investing Activities 2022 - Cash used in investing activities was$268 million in 2022, a decrease of$1,686 million from 2021. The change in investing cash flow was primarily driven by the acquisition of Alion in 2021. For 2023, we expect our capital expenditures for maintenance and sustainment to be approximately 1.5% of annual revenues and our discretionary capital expenditures to be approximately 1.5% to 2.5% of annual revenues. 2021 - Cash used in investing activities was$1,954 million in 2021, an increase of$1,195 million from 2020. The change in investing cash flow was driven by the acquisitions of Alion and a non-controlling interest in a specialty fabrication and ship repair joint venture in 2021, partially offset by the acquisition of Hydroid in 2020 and lower capital expenditures and the disposition of our oil and gas business in 2021. Financing Activities 2022 - Cash used in financing activities in 2022 was$658 million , compared to$1,309 million provided by financing activities in 2021. The change in financing cash was primarily due to a$1,650 million decrease in proceeds from long-term debt, a$375 million increase in the repayment of long-term debt, a$7 million increase in employee taxes on share-based payment arrangements, and a$6 million increase in cash dividend payments, partially offset by a$49 million decrease in common stock repurchases and a$22 million decrease in debt issuance costs. 2021 - Cash provided by financing activities in 2021 was$1,309 million , compared to$103 million provided by financing activities in 2020. The change in financing cash was primarily due to a$1,225 million increase in net proceeds from long-term debt, a$15 million decrease in premiums related to the 2020 early extinguishment of debt, and a$6 million decrease in employee taxes on share-based payment arrangements, partially offset by a$17 million increase in common stock repurchases, a$14 million increase in cash dividend payments, and a$9 million increase in debt issuance costs.
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow represents cash provided by (used in) operating activities less
capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds. Free cash flow is not a
measure recognized under GAAP. Free cash flow has limitations as an analytical
tool and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, net
earnings as a measure of our performance or net cash provided by operating
activities as a measure of our liquidity. We believe free cash flow is an
important liquidity measure for our investors because it provides them insight
into our current and period-to-period performance and our ability to generate
cash from continuing operations. We also use free cash flow as a key operating
metric in assessing the performance of our business and as a key performance
measure in evaluating management performance and determining incentive
compensation. Free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures
of other companies.
49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to free
cash flow:
Year Ended December 31
($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 766 $ 760 $ 1,093
Less capital expenditures:
Capital expenditure additions (284) (331)
(353)
Grant proceeds for capital expenditures 12 20 17 Free cash flow$ 494 $ 449 $ 757 2022 - Free cash flow increased$45 million from 2021, primarily due to lower contributions to retiree benefit plans, lower capital expenditures, and favorable changes in trade working capital, partially offset by higher income tax and interest payments. 2021 - Free cash flow decreased$308 million from 2020, primarily due to an unfavorable change in trade working capital, partially offset by lower income tax payments, lower contributions to retiree benefit plans, and lower capital expenditures.
Retirement Related Benefit Plan Contributions
ERISA, including amendments under pension relief legislation, defines the minimum amount we must contribute to our qualified defined benefit pension plans. In determining whether to make discretionary contributions to these plans above the minimum required amounts, we consider various factors, including maintaining the funded status needed to avoid potential benefit restrictions and other adverse consequences, maintaining minimum CAS funding requirements, and the current and anticipated future funding levels of each plan. The contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans are affected by a number of factors, including publishedIRS interest rates, the actual return on plan assets, actuarial assumptions, and demographic experience. These factors and our resulting contributions also impact the funded status of the plans. We made the following minimum and discretionary contributions to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans in the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021, and 2020: Year Ended December 31 ($ in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Pension plans Discretionary Qualified $ -$ 60 $ 205 Non-qualified 10 9 8 Other benefit plans 31 37 33 Total contributions$ 41 $ 106 $ 246 We made discretionary contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans totaling less than$1 million ,$60 million , and$205 million in the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021, and 2020, respectively. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, our qualified pension plans were funded 109% and 102%, respectively, on a FAS basis. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, these plans were sufficiently funded on an ERISA basis so as not to be subject to benefit payment restrictions. The funded percentages under ERISA and FAS vary due to inherent differences in the assumptions and methodologies used to calculate the respective obligations. We expect our 2023 cash contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans to be less than$1 million , all of which we anticipate will be discretionary and which are exclusive of CAS cost recoveries under our contracts. Due to the differences in calculation methodologies, our FAS expense is not necessarily representative of our funding requirements or CAS cost recoveries. Other postretirement benefit plan contributions were$31 million ,$37 million , and$33 million in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. We expect 2023 contributions to our other postretirement benefit plans to be approximately$35 million , which are exclusive of CAS cost recoveries under our contracts. Contributions for other postretirement benefit plans are not required to be funded in advance and are paid on an as-incurred basis. 50 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Sources and Uses of Capital
Stockholder Distributions - InNovember 2022 , our board of directors authorized an increase in our quarterly cash dividend to$1.24 per share. The board previously increased the quarterly cash dividend to$1.18 per share inNovember 2021 and$1.14 per share inNovember 2020 . We paid cash dividends totaling$192 million ($4.78 per share),$186 million ($4.60 per share), and$172 million ($4.23 per share) in the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021, and 2020, respectively. InNovember 2019 , our board of directors authorized an increase to our stock repurchase program from$2.2 billion to$3.2 billion and an extension of the term of the program toOctober 31, 2024 . Repurchases are made from time to time at management's discretion in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. For the year endedDecember 31, 2022 , we repurchased 244,561 shares at an aggregate cost of$52 million . For the years endedDecember 31, 2021 and 2020, we repurchased 544,440 and 390,904 shares, respectively, at aggregate costs of$101 million and$84 million , respectively. The cost of repurchased shares is recorded as treasury stock in the consolidated statements of financial position.Additional Capital - In 2021, we issued$1 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes, and we entered into a$650 million 3-year delayed draw term loan. The net proceeds were used to fund a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of Alion. In 2021, we amended and restated our existing$1.25 billion credit facility, increasing the capacity thereunder to$1.5 billion and extending the maturity date to five years from signing (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). The Revolving Credit Facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of$300 million . In 2020, we issued$1 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes. The net proceeds were intended to be used for general corporate purposes, including debt repayments and working capital.
In 2020, we redeemed
senior notes in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the notes.
We maintain an unsecured commercial paper note program, under which we may issue
up to
For a description of our outstanding debt amounts and related restrictive
covenants, see Note 13: Debt in Item 8.
Contractual obligations - Our future contractual obligations are related to debt, leases, pension liabilities, unrecognized tax benefits, workers compensation, and purchase obligations. See Note 13: Debt, Note 15: Leases, Note 17: Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits, Note 12: Income Taxes, and Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Item 8 for information about those obligations. Our purchase obligations as ofDecember 31, 2022 , were approximately$4,525 million , with approximately$2,451 million expected to be paid in 2023 and$2,074 million thereafter. A purchase obligation is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum, or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , future scheduled periodic interest payments on our outstanding long-term debt, including commitment fees that we are obligated to pay on our Revolving Credit Facility, were approximately$437 million , with approximately$101 million expected to be paid in 2023 and$336 million thereafter.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, we use letters of credit issued by commercial banks to support certain leases, insurance policies, and contractual performance obligations, as well as surety bonds issued by insurance companies principally to support our self-insured workers' compensation plans. As ofDecember 31, 2022 ,$14 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn and$360 million of surety bonds were outstanding. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had no other significant off-balance sheet arrangements. 51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GLOSSARY OF PROGRAMS
Included below are brief descriptions of some of the programs discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ProgramName Program Description America class (LHA 6) amphibious Design and build large deck amphibious assault ships assault ships that provide forward
presence and power projection as
an integral part of joint, interagency and
multinational maritime expeditionary forces. The
America class (LHA 6) ships, together with the Wasp
class (LHD 1) ships, are the successors to the
decommissioned Tarawa class (LHA 1) ships. The America
class (LHA 6) ships optimize aviation operations and
support capabilities. In
2020, we delivered USS Tripoli
(LHA 7), and, in 2022, we
were awarded a long-lead-time
material and construction
contract for
9). We are currently
constructing Bougainville (LHA 8)
and Fallujah (LHA 9).
anti-air, anti-submarine,
anti-surface, and strike
operations. The
Aegis-equipped
51) destroyers are theU.S. Navy's primary surface combatant, and have been constructed in variants, allowing technological
advances during construction. We
delivered USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117), USS Delbert D.
Black (DDG 119), USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG 121),
and Lenah H. Sutcliffe
Higbee (DDG 123) in 2019, 2020,
2021, and 2022,
respectively. We have contracts to
construct the following
destroyers: USS Jack H.
Lucas (DDG 125),
(DDG 128), Jeremiah Denton
(DDG 129),
(DDG 131), Sam Nunn (DDG
133),
John F. Lehman (DDG 137),
and
139).
Carrier RCOH Perform refueling and
complex overhaul ("RCOH") of
nuclear-powered aircraft
carriers, which is required at
the mid-point of their
50-year life cycle. USS George
Washington (CVN 73) arrived atNewport News for the start of its RCOH inAugust 2017 , and USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) arrived atNewport News for the start of its RCOH inMay 2021 .Columbia class (SSBN 826) submarines Participating in designing theColumbia class submarine as a replacement for the current agingOhio class nuclear ballistic missile submarines, which were first introduced into service in 1981. TheOhio class SSBN includes 14 nuclear
ballistic missile submarines and
four nuclear cruise missile submarines. TheColumbia class program plan of record is to construct 12 new ballistic missile submarines. TheU.S. Navy has initiated the design process for the new class of submarines, and, in early 2017, theDoD signed the acquisition decision
memorandum approving the
class program's Milestone B, which formally authorizes
the program's entry into the engineering and
manufacturing development phase. We perform design work
as a subcontractor to Electric Boat, and we have
entered into a teaming
agreement with Electric Boat to
build modules for the entire
submarine program that
leverages our
(SSN 774) experience. We
have been awarded contracts
from Electric Boat for
integrated product and process
development, providing
long-lead-time material and
advance construction, and
construction of the first two
boats of theColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine program. Construction of the firstColumbia class (SSBN 826) submarine began in 2020. Fleet sustainment Maintains and modernizes a significant majority of theU.S. Navy fleet, from small watercraft to submarines, combatants, and aircraft carriers, our systems and maintenance experts help theNavy maintain a high state of readiness. Ensures
effective system operation and
sustainment by actively supporting design and
decision-making processes through studies, analyses,
and reviews of program
documents, and provides a wide
range of logistics products.
52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USS Gerald R. Ford class (CVN 78) Design and construct the Ford class program, which is
aircraft carriers the aircraft carrier
replacement program for the
decommissioned Enterprise
(CVN 65) and Nimitz class (CVN
68) aircraft carriers. USS
first ship of the Ford
class, was delivered to the
Navy in the second quarter of 2017. InJune 2015 , we were awarded a contract for the detail design and construction ofJohn F. Kennedy (CVN 79), following several years of
engineering, advance construction, and
purchase of long-lead-time
components and material. In
addition, we have received
awards for detail design and
construction of Enterprise (CVN 80) andDoris Miller (CVN 81). This category also includes the class' non-recurring engineering. The class is expected to bring improved warfighting
capability, quality of life
improvements for sailors,
and reduced life cycle costs.
Legend class National Security Cutter Design and build theU.S. Coast Guard's National Security Cutters ("NSCs"), the largest and most technically advanced class of cutter in theU.S. Coast Guard . The NSC is equipped to carry out maritimehomeland security , maritime safety, protection of natural resources, maritime mobility, and national defense missions. The plan is for a total of 11 ships, of which the first nine ships have been delivered.Calhoun (NSC 10) and
Friedman (NSC 11) are currently
under construction.
Mission based solutions Develops integrated solutions that enable today's
connected, all-domain force. Capabilities include:
command, control, computers, communications, cyber,
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance ("C5ISR")
systems and operations; the application of artificial
intelligence and machine learning to battlefield
decisions; defensive and
offensive cyberspace strategies
and electronic warfare
("CEWS"); and live, virtual, and
constructive ("LVC")
solutions.
Naval nuclear support services Provide services to and in
support of the
ranging from services
supporting the
submarine fleets to
maintenance services at
training facilities. Naval
nuclear support services
include design,
construction, maintenance, and disposal
activities for in-serviceU.S. Navy nuclear ships worldwide through mobile and in-house capabilities. Services include maintenance services on nuclear reactor prototypes. Nuclear and environmental services Supports the national
security mission of the Department
of Energy ("DoE") through
the management and operation
of DoE sites, as well as the safe cleanup of legacy
waste across the country. We meet our clients' toughest
nuclear and environmental
challenges and are positioned
to serve the growing
commercial nuclear power plant
decommissioning market. We participate in several joint
ventures, including Newport News Nuclear BWXT Los
Alamos, LLC (" N3B"),
Mission Support and Test Services,
LLC ("MSTS"), and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
("SRNS"), and we are an integrated subcontractor to
Triad National Security. N3B was awarded the Los Alamos
Legacy Cleanup Contract at the DoE/National Nuclear
Security Administration's Los Alamos National
Laboratory. MSTS was awarded a contract for site
management and operations at the Nevada National
Security Site. SRNS provides site management and
operations at the DoE's
Savannah River Site near
South Carolina . Triad provides site management and operations at theDoE's Los Alamos National Laboratory . 53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
San Antonio class (LPD 17) amphibious Design and build amphibious transport dock ships, which transport dock ships are warships that embark, transport, and land elements of a landing force for a variety of expeditionary warfare missions, and also serve as the secondary aviation platform for
Amphibious Readiness Groups. The
San Antonio class (LPD 17)
is the newest addition to
the U.S. Navy's 21st century
amphibious assault force,
and these ships are a key
element of the
seabase transformation. In
2022, we delivered USS Fort
Lauderdale (LPD 28), and we
were awarded a
long-lead-time material
contract for LPD 32 (unnamed).
We are currently
constructing
(LPD 29), Harrisburg (LPD
30), and
Unmanned systems Creates advanced unmanned
maritime solutions for
defense, marine research,
and commercial applications.
Serving customers in more
than 30 countries, unmanned
systems provides design, autonomy, manufacturing,
testing, operations, and sustainment of unmanned
systems, including unmanned underwater vehicles and
unmanned surface vessels.
Virginia class (SSN 774) fast attack Construct attack submarines as the principal
submarines subcontractor to Electric
Boat. The
774) is a post-Cold War
design tailored to excel in a
wide range of warfighting missions, including
anti-submarine and surface ship warfare; special
operation forces; strike;
intelligence, surveillance,
and reconnaissance; carrier
and expeditionary strike
group support; and mine
warfare.


Approaching ‘Medicaid cliff’ could leave hundreds of thousands uninsured
Bill would require officers to obtain liability insurance
Advisor News
- Benefit Costs Squeeze Schools, Driving Cuts, Tax Hikes And Difficult Tradeoffs
- Why client insurance needs could change even if their life doesn’t
- Most Gen Z investors think less than a year ahead when making financial decisions
- IRI pitches retirement agenda to Jeffries as democrats shape affordability platform
- Help child-free clients plan for their later years
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Ty J. Young Wealth Management Acquires Senior Insurance Services, Expanding Its Growing Annuity Firm: Ty J. Young Wealth Management
- Guidance, bulletin or reg? NAIC debates form of annuity illustration update
- Nationwide adds mutual fund-linked strategy to New Heights Select FIA
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News