Findings on Machine Learning Reported by Investigators at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) (Fraud Detection In Healthcare Claims Using Machine Learning: a Systematic Review): Machine Learning

2025 FEB 19 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Health Policy and Law Daily -- Investigators publish new report on Machine Learning. According to news reporting originating in Blacksburg, Virginia, by NewsRx journalists, research stated, “Identifying fraud in healthcare programs is crucial, as an estimated 3%-10% of the total healthcare expenditures are lost to fraudulent activities. This study presents a systematic literature review of machine learning techniques applied to fraud detection in health insurance claims.”

Financial support for this research came from Deloitte & Touche LLP, United States.

The news reporters obtained a quote from the research from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), “We aim to analyze the data and methodologies documented in the literature over the past two decades, providing insights into research challenges and opportunities. We identified research studies on health insurance fraud detection using machine learning approaches from databases such as Google Scholar, Springer-Link journals, Elsevier, PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Scopus, the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore Digital Library. We included only articles that presented experimental results of machine learning-based approaches applied to healthcare claims. From the reviewed articles, 137 were selected for the final qualitative and quantitative analyses. In recent years, there has been a surge in publications centered on the use of machine learning to detect health insurance fraud. Among these studies, those focused on the detection of fraud committed by healthcare providers was the most prevalent, followed by fraud committed by patients. A wide variety of machine learning algorithms are highlighted in these studies, ranging from unsupervised (41 studies) and supervised methods (94 studies), to hybrid approaches (12 studies). While traditional machine learning approaches remain dominant in this research area, the adoption of advanced deep learning techniques is on the rise. Considering the type of healthcare claims data used, 30 studies utilized private data sources, while the rest used publicly available datasets. Data from 16 countries were utilized, with a majority coming from the United States (96 studies), followed by China (11 studies) and Australia (5 studies). Detecting fraud in healthcare claims using machine learning presents several challenges. These include inconsistent data, absence of data standardization and integration, privacy concerns, and a limited number of labeled fraudulent cases to train models on. Future work should focus on enhancing transparency in data preparation, promoting the sharing of fraud investigation outcomes by authorities, and developing benchmark datasets to enhance accessibility and comparability.”

According to the news reporters, the research concluded: “Furthermore, innovative techniques in data sampling, feature encoding methods for training machine learning models, and exploring the latest advancements in deep learning can significantly advance research in health insurance fraud detection.”

This research has been peer-reviewed.

For more information on this research see: Fraud Detection In Healthcare Claims Using Machine Learning: a Systematic Review. Artificial Intelligence In Medicine, 2025;160. Artificial Intelligence In Medicine can be contacted at: Elsevier, Radarweg 29, 1043 Nx Amsterdam, Netherlands. (Elsevier - www.elsevier.com; Artificial Intelligence In Medicine - http://www.journals.elsevier.com/artificial-intelligence-in-medicine/)

Our news correspondents report that additional information may be obtained by contacting Anli du Preez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Grad Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061, United States. Additional authors for this research include Peter Beling, Sanmitra Bhattacharya and Edward Bowen.

The direct object identifier (DOI) for that additional information is: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.103061. This DOI is a link to an online electronic document that is either free or for purchase, and can be your direct source for a journal article and its citation.

(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)