Citizens Insurance stopped again from forcing disputes into binding arbitration while challenge proceeds
A
Circuit Judge
Polo’s order, rather than stopping action only in Alvarez’ case, barred Citizens from diverting any and all claims disputes to the state’s
Polo also denied Citizens’ motion to move the trial to
On
On Thursday, Polo ruled that failing to lift the stay while Citizens pursued its appeal “risks depriving policyholders of constitutional protections.”
After Thursday’s ruling, Citizens spokesman
Alvarez’ attorney
The DOAH system, approved by both Citizens’
By contrast, private market insurers can offer policy provisions — known as endorsements — giving them the right to divert disputes to arbitration, but those are typically in exchange for a premium discount and policyholders have the right to reject the provisions.
Under Citizens’ mandatory endorsement, policyholders surrender their rights to a “jury trial, access to courts, and due process on the breach of their contract claims” while being offered “neither a fair alternative nor a reduction in premiums,” Polo wrote in a four-page order.
Since 2024, Citizens moved more than 1,300 claims to the DOAH courts. A
Advised by their lawyers that the system sets them up to fail, a majority of policyholders either settle or drop their claims before advancing to a hearing, plaintiffs attorneys told the
“Irreparable harm is unmistakable and severe,” Polo wrote. Alvarez has demonstrated that the DOAH forum is “structurally biased and deprives policyholders of neutral discovery, motion practice and judicial review,” the judge wrote.
Meanwhile, “the record shows that DOAH repeatedly awards fees and/or costs to (Citizens) while denying the same relief to the insureds,” she wrote.
Plaintiffs attorneys have said that Citizens routinely offers
The DOAH endorsement “itself does not provide a way to challenge the validity of any proposals for settlement served prior to a hearing on the amounts,” Polo wrote.
DOAH judges even “routinely award costs to [Citizens] in cases where [Citizens] does not file proposals for settlement,” the judge wrote. “The result is that ordinary citizens … are stripped of their constitutional rights and left powerless in a tribunal that appears to favor the state’s insurer.”
Last year, Citizens’
©2025 South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Visit sun-sentinel.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



New law on mental health insurance lacks enforcement
City will pay bail bonding company $100K for blacklisting
Advisor News
- Retirement Reimagined: This generation says it’s no time to slow down
- The Conversation Gap: Clients tuning out on advisor health care discussions
- Wall Street executives warn Trump: Stop attacking the Fed and credit card industry
- Americans have ambitious financial resolutions for 2026
- FSI announces 2026 board of directors and executive committee members
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Retirees drive demand for pension-like income amid $4T savings gap
- Reframing lifetime income as an essential part of retirement planning
- Integrity adds further scale with blockbuster acquisition of AIMCOR
- MetLife Declares First Quarter 2026 Common Stock Dividend
- Using annuities as a legacy tool: The ROP feature
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Thousands in Conn. face higher health insurance costs
- Ben Franklin's birthday; Meet Mandy Mango; Weekly gun violence brief | Morning Roundup
- Virginia Republicans split over extending health care subsidies
- CareSource spotlights youth mental health
- Hawaii lawmakers start looking into HMSA-HPH alliance plan
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News