ATTORNEY GENERAL RAOUL LEADS COALITION CHALLENGING TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S LATEST ATTACK ON HEALTHCARE FOR TRANSGENDER YOUTH
The following information was released by the office of the
Attorney General
At a time when our country faces a true healthcare crisis due tospiralingcostsof care, a shortage of providers, and rural hospital closures leaving communities with no providers for miles,the Trump administration isattempting to score political points by continuing to threaten healthcarefor avery small and vulnerable population, Raoul said. No federal agency has the power to directly regulate the practice of medicinea traditional and congressionally recognized power reserved for the states. If the Trump administration is allowed to decide what is safe and appropriate healthcare for this population, whats to stop them from meddling in everyones care? The administrations unlawful actions should concern us all, as they affect us alltoday or in the future. I remainfirmly committed to advocatingfor the rights of transgender youth and to protecting all Illinoisans from unlawful federal interference in their healthcare choices.
In their lawsuit, Raoul and the coalition argue that since the creation of the Medicaid and Childrens Health Insurance Program (CHIP) programs in the 1960s,
In December 2025,HHSproposed a rule prohibiting federal reimbursement for gender-affirming care for Medicaid beneficiaries under age 18 and CHIP beneficiaries under age 19, despite covering the same healthcare treatment when provided to non-transgender youth. HHS received more than 30,000 comments on the proposal. More than 90% of the comments, including comments from a coalition of state attorneys general co-led by Raoul, opposed the rule. Despite this strong opposition, the broad medical consensus on the safety and efficacy of transgender youth healthcare and strong state law guardrails to ensure high-quality care, HHS finalized the rule earlier this month, with an effective date of
In their complaint, Raoul and the coalition argue that the rule would set a troubling and unlawful precedent that the executive branch can, without congressional authorization, replace individualized judgments made by licensed medical practitioners with a categorical, agency-determined prohibition on reimbursement for healthcare it disfavors.
The coalition argues that the rule runs counter to several federal and state laws. They also assert that the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause of the
Since the first day of
Raoul co-led the coalition with the attorneys general of


NEW YORK FED AND DALLAS FED RELEASE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON THE PRIVATE CREDIT SURVEY
BANK FUNDING CONFERENCE: BANK FUNDING IN THE AGE OF INSTANT FINANCE HOSTED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS OF BOSTON AND DALLAS
Advisor News
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
- A client remarried: Does their annuity still fit?
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News