American Association of Nurse Practitioners Issues Public Comment on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Proposed Rule
* * *
The
As you know, NPs are advanced practice registered nurses who are prepared at the masters or doctoral level to provide high-quality/1 primary, acute, chronic and specialty care to patients of all ages and backgrounds. Daily practice includes assessment; ordering, performing, supervising and interpreting diagnostic and laboratory tests; making diagnoses; initiating and managing treatment including prescribing medication and non-pharmacologic treatments; coordinating care; counseling; and educating patients and their families and communities. NPs hold prescriptive authority in all 50 states and the
No state has ever moved away from
NPs practice in nearly every health care setting including hospitals, clinics,
As of 2019, there were more than 163,000 NPs billing for Medicare services, making NPs the largest and fastest growing Medicare designated provider specialty./3
Approximately 40% of Medicare patients receive billable services from a nurse practitioner/4 and approximately 80% of NPs are seeing Medicare and Medicaid patients. NPs have a particularly large impact on primary care as approximately 70% of all NP graduates deliver primary care./5
In fact, NPs comprise approximately one-quarter of the primary care workforce, with that percentage growing annually./6
We appreciate the opportunity to provide comment on this proposed rule and our comments regarding certain sections of the rule can be found below.
Network Adequacy (Sec. 156.230)
In this proposed rule, HHS states that it will be issuing future rulemaking on network adequacy, and requested stakeholder feedback on how the federal government should approach network adequacy reviews.
As HHS evaluates its approach to network adequacy reviews, AANP reiterates the importance of enforcing Section 2706 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which prohibits private health plans from discriminating against qualified licensed healthcare professionals based on their licensure. In
Ensuring that network adequacy reviews include an evaluation of compliance with this legislation. NPs provide a substantial share of the high-quality, cost-effective health care that our nation requires, particularly in underserved and rural communities. Preventing insurer discrimination against NPs based on licensure is essential to ensuring robust patient access to health care services, promoting patient choice of health care providers, and reducing out-of-pocket costs on patients who choose APRNs as their health care practitioners. To maintain necessary patient access to care, we strongly encourage HHS to reinforce the provider anti-discrimination rules in its network adequacy requirements.
As HHS undertakes the rulemaking process on network adequacy and provider non-discrimination we make the following recommendations on objectives to ensure that the final rules prevent provider discrimination:
1. Clearly and comprehensively define discrimination and the intent of the provider non-discrimination provision.
2. Ensure NPs working within their state scope of practice are reimbursed at the same level equal to their physician counterparts for providing the same services to patients.
3. Prohibit health plans, health insurers, and payor practices that deny NPs access to insurance networks and advanced payment models and prevent patients from choosing NPs as their primary care providers. This also includes preventing requirements that impose supervision or additional certification or training beyond state licensing requirements, deny coverage of services and procedures within the NPs scope of practice, require geographic limitations on provider network participation and consider their level of training and experience not on par with their physician counterparts.
4. Create a robust enforcement and penalties mechanism to ensure all health plans, health insurers and payors comply with Section 2706.
5. Establish a streamlined notice and complaint process for providers so they can obtain an independent resolution of their complaint in a timely fashion.
6. Ensure NPs do not face retaliation for their complaints regarding Section 2706.
In order to properly honor the intent of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 and Section 2706 of the ACA, these are key provisions that rulemaking must address. NPs provide a substantial share of the high-quality, cost-effective health care that our nation requires, particularly in underserved and rural communities. Preventing insurer discrimination against NPs based on licensure is essential to ensuring robust patient access to health care services, promoting patient choice of health care providers, and reducing out-of-pocket costs on patients who choose NPs as their health care practitioners.
Provisions of the Proposed Rule for Section 1332 Waivers-
We agree with HHS on the rescission of the 2018 Guidance for section 1332 waivers. At the time the guidance was issued, AANP expressed concerns, many of which are referenced in this proposed rule, that the guidance was inconsistent with the statutory "guardrails" of comprehensiveness and affordability of coverage, which could have an adverse impact on patients, particularly those with pre-existing conditions.
As we noted in our prior comment, under the 2018 guidance financial assistance would be allowed for short-term, limited duration insurance (STLDI) plans,/7 and CMS had previously acknowledged that STLDI plans would weaken States' individual market single risk pools./8
We agree that section 1332 waivers should focus on increasing access to affordable, high-quality health care for all Americans and that doing so is consistent with the goal of advancing health equity. As noted in this proposed rule, HHS expects that after the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency individuals will be transitioning from Medicaid coverage to the Exchange./9
We encourage the promotion of 1332 waivers that would streamline this transition and ensure that patients who move from Medicaid to the Exchange are able to maintain continuity of care both in terms of their health care provider and the treatment and services that they are receiving through Medicaid.
Conclusion
We thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed rule and your continued efforts to increase access to care and address health equity. We look forward to discussing these issues with you. Should you have comments or questions, please direct them to
Sincerely,
Chief Executive Officer
* * *
Footnotes:
2/ https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/state/state-practice-environment.
3/ https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2019cpsmdcrproviders6.pdf
4/ https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2019cpsmdcrphyssupp6.pdf
5/ NP Fact Sheet (aanp.org)
6/ Rural and Nonrural Primary Care Physician Practices Increasingly Rely On Nurse Practitioners,
7/ Section 1332 State Relief and Empowerment Waiver Concepts, Discussion Paper,
8/ 83 FR 7437, 7443.
9/ 86 FR 35156, 35170.
* * *
The proposed rule can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov/document/CMS-2021-0113-0002
TARGETED NEWS SERVICE (founded 2004) features non-partisan 'edited journalism' news briefs and information for news organizations, public policy groups and individuals; as well as 'gathered' public policy information, including news releases, reports, speeches. For more information contact
Mich. Insurance & Financial Services Department Issues Public Comment on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Proposed Rule
Covered California Issues Public Comment on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Proposed Rule
Advisor News
- Turning political uncertainty into portfolio gold
- Why investors fire advisors (and why they keep them)
- Women seek referrals from other women
- 24 facts that illuminate women’s precarious retirement prospects
- How do you network within the HNW social set?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News