A test can help doctors treat cancer. But Ohio doesn't require insurers pay for it
Facing a relapse of rare acute myeloid leukemia,
Topalian, 30, was among the first patients to use biomarker testing when she was first diagnosed with leukemia at age four. Back then, the testing wasn't widely accessible. By the time Topalian relapsed in 2021, it was becoming the standard of care − comparable to a roadmap for treating cancer.
But as Topalian was leaving the hospital months later, she learned that her health insurance would not cover biomarker testing because it wasn't medically necessary. Topalian spent a year documenting months of specialists' visits to convince her insurance otherwise.
"It was such a pain and so stressful because it was this thing that my doctors told me is the future and this is how we treat you now, and my insurance is going to say that it's not medically necessary," said Topalian, who works in
Enter Ohio House Bill 24, which would require Medicaid and private health insurance to cover all FDA-approved biomarker testing that a doctor deems medically necessary. There are some limits: biomarker testing couldn't be used for screening alone.
Biomarker testing uses a sample of tissue, blood, bone marrow or another bodily fluid to check for genes, proteins or other molecules that offer clues about a person's cancer, according to the
Rep.
"The more I learned, the more convinced I was that the human case and the business case are there for passing biomarker testing coverage in
The bill is backed by the
Opposition from health insurers, small businesses
But health insurance companies say they already cover some biomarker testing, and they are wary of costly mandates that could hurt their ability to negotiate prices.
"Many plans already offer coverage of multiple biomarker tests that are determined to have the clinical evidence and data to back up the efficacy of the testing," said Kelly O’Reilly, president and CEO of the
A single-panel test costs private insurers about
In 2020, 44% of cancer patients paid an out-of-pocket cost for biomarker testing and one-third paid more than
The
Still, White is encouraged by positive conversations with the
A similar bill passed the House's health committee last November but that was too late for a full review by the
'It's a no-brainer for me'
For
The pills are a marked difference from the surgery, extensive chemotherapy and radiation treatments that marked her first round with cancer at age 48. But tissue extracted from that treatment helped her to chart a different course when the cancer returned 18 months later.
Ennis isn't sure whether her insurance or researchers at
With eight weeks of targeted treatment, Ennis went from stage four advanced to no evidence of disease. At the same time, she was able to care for her mother and volunteer at her church.
"Without that biomarker testing, I would not be alive today," Ennis said. "It's a no-brainer for me. This tool should be available."
This article originally appeared on
Viewpoint from 00:49 to 00:54 in US/Mountain
Managers' scammed with medical policy
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News