Closing the Medicare doughnut hole. Pre-existing conditions. Extending dependent coverage. Preventive Care. Limits and denials. Reinsurance for early…
| Proquest LLC |
Closing the
By
The rubber hits the road this week for the Affordable Care Act, as most Americans will be required to have health insurance or pay a penalty.
But the health care law's journey began nearly four years ago, and many tenets of the 900-page legislation have already taken effect.
Here's a look at its impact in
policy change
Closing the
The doughnut hole is a gap in coverage from
It starts after the recipient and the plan pay a certain amount (
Took effect: Rebates, discounts and increased coverage to close the doughnut hole began in 2010.
How did it go? Shortly after the Affordable Care Act was signed into law, seniors entering the doughnut hole were sent one-time
In 2012, people on
More than 80,500 Virginians benefited from the discount, totaling over
Some had wondered if drug companies would nullify any savings by raising prices. That didn't seem to happen, and seniors have been pleased with the discounts, said
policy change
Pre-existing conditions
The Affordable Care Act set up the temporary Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan for people who were denied insurance or quoted extremely high rates because of a medical condition. The plan was meant to provide them coverage until 2014, when, under the health care law, private plans no longer can reject people or charge higher rates because of their medical histories. Because of problems with the health insurance marketplaces, the plan has been extended to the end of January.
Took effect: Enrollment began in
How did it go? The program started slowly, and federal officials dropped the price of premiums in
The government had predicted that as many as 375,000 people would enroll in the plan nationwide; ultimately, about 135,000 did.
However, their claims were so expensive, the program stopped accepting new enrollees in February and payment rates were reduced in May to avoid exhausting the
For some patients with serious, chronic conditions such as cancer and heart disease, the program offered the most viable option, said
Some didn't benefit from the plan because they couldn't go six months without coverage, as was required to qualify. For others, the program was unaffordable.
Still, Patterson said, "it was a step in the right direction."
policy change
Early retiree reinsurance
The federal government set aside
Took effect: The government started accepting applications in
How did it go? Nearly 140 Virginia employers, including several South Hampton Roads governments and school divisions, were among 5,699 across the nation that were approved.
Although the program originally was intended to run through 2013, its popularity forced officials to stop accepting reimbursement requests for claims incurred in 2012 or beyond. The federal government recovered about
The city of
"Anyone who was even mildly cynical sort of took a quick look at that and said, 'This is just money to make employers happy,' " said
policy change
Extending dependent coverage
Families can include adult children up to age 26 on any individual or group health policy.
Took effect: For plan years beginning on or after
How did it go? In 2009, about 73 percent of
The share of 25- to 34-year-olds with insurance dropped from 75 to 73 percent during that period, although the number of civilians in that age group reporting that they were insured increased by 21,400.
Before the change, parents already could keep dependents on their employer-based plans if they paid the full premium. It was an option generally selected for young adults who needed significant medical care, Pollitz said.
Some states passed laws allowing the extended coverage before fall 2010, but the change to federal law meant employer plans had to comply.
Dr.
Nationally, government officials estimate that more than 3 million young adults gained coverage from this provision.
"A lot of kids came back on," Pollitz said. "Chances are, they were healthier. So it probably didn't add enormously to the cost of employer health plans."
policy change
Preventive care
New health plans must cover without cost-sharing certain preventive services. In some cases, a person must be at a higher risk for the condition in order to qualify. Services include recommended immunizations and some screenings.
Took effect: For private plan years beginning on or after
How did it go? Dr.
Other factors, he said, include more reminders, incentives and other encouragement from providers, insurance companies and employers.
In
Hutchinson said the preventive services are most beneficial for new
"If you're 80 years old, you probably won't think much of preventive services," he said.
Annual physicals without cost-sharing are a benefit that
policy change
Limits and denials
Health plans are prohibited from denying or limiting coverage to children because of pre-existing conditions and from placing lifetime dollar limits on most benefits. Insurance companies can no longer rescind coverage because a member got sick or made a mistake on an application.
Took effect: For plan years beginning on or after
How did it go? All three changes were steps toward greater changes scheduled for 2014.
Most large employer plans stopped denying coverage for anyone with pre-existing conditions several years ago, due to other laws, Pollitz said. With the 2010 change, non-group plans no longer could deny children coverage because of a pre-existing condition, but they could charge more. Sometimes, that kept sick kids off the plans.
"Insurers that wanted to could just use a different method to make them go away," Pollitz said, adding that children will see a greater benefit next year, when plans can no longer charge more for pre-existing conditions.
Similarly, doing away with lifetime limits had less impact than doing away with annual limits will - a change scheduled for 2014 - because few people actually hit lifetime limits.
People most at risk for a rescission were those in the individual market who filed large claims in the first few years on the policy, Pollitz said. Insurers would review their paperwork and sometimes find reasons to take away the coverage.
The 2010 change protected people from being dumped from plans after an expensive claim, but it didn't limit the premium increase that insurers could charge upon renewal. Starting next year, premiums in the individual and small group markets may vary based only on age, tobacco use, family size and geography.
"The widespread impact was to make coverage more secure for people," Pollitz said.
policy change
Medical loss ratio
Insurance companies must give consumers refunds if they fail to spend 85 percent of large-group premium revenue and 80 percent of individual and small-group revenue on either medical care or quality- improvement efforts versus administrative costs.
Took effect: Rebates first became available in 2012 for coverage purchased in 2011.
How did it go? Insurers returned a total of
In the program's second year,
Pollitz said the decrease in rebate amounts actually is good for consumers.
"It means that insurance got more efficient," she said, "that insurers used more of your premium dollars to pay claims and less to pay for operations - essentially their computers, their staff and CEO salaries, their profits - so that you're getting more for your money in terms of coverage."
policy change
Rate review
Insurance companies must publicly justify requests for premium rate increases of 10 percent or more for plans in the individual and small-group markets.
Took effect: Began in 2011.
How did it go? Before this change was implemented, three out of four requests for premium increases were for hikes of 10 percent or more, federal officials say. Now, their requests reach that level 14 percent of the time.
Earlier this year, the
The new rate-review rules and the medical-loss-ratio standard work together to keep premium rates in check, Pollitz said.
"If there's more stringent and exacting rate review at the front end, you're going to see less rebates from the medical loss ratio on the back end," she said. "Insurers know that, even if they're getting a free pass on the rate increases, there's only so much of it they're going to be allowed to keep."
| Copyright: | (c) 2013 ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved. |
| Wordcount: | 2056 |



Advisor News
- Retirement Reimagined: This generation says it’s no time to slow down
- The Conversation Gap: Clients tuning out on advisor health care discussions
- Wall Street executives warn Trump: Stop attacking the Fed and credit card industry
- Americans have ambitious financial resolutions for 2026
- FSI announces 2026 board of directors and executive committee members
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Retirees drive demand for pension-like income amid $4T savings gap
- Reframing lifetime income as an essential part of retirement planning
- Integrity adds further scale with blockbuster acquisition of AIMCOR
- MetLife Declares First Quarter 2026 Common Stock Dividend
- Using annuities as a legacy tool: The ROP feature
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Health insurance enrollment deadline extended
- Fresno Unified broke lifetime benefits promise after 2023 decision, retirees say
- More Texans have signed up for ACA health coverage despite expiring subsidies and falling national enrollment
- Military personnel, families can receive free test for cancer
- Health insurance costs putting squeeze on North Attleboro budget
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News