CDA-Sponsored Bill Requires Insurance Premium Dollars to Go Toward Care
| Targeted News Service |
The
If enacted, AB 1962 would provide dental patients with the same minimum loss ratio (MLR) protections that they currently receive with their medical plans - requiring dental plans to spend a minimum percentage of premium revenues, either 80 percent or 85 percent, directly on patient care.
Under state law and the Affordable Care Act, all medical plans must adhere to an MLR, however, no such standards exist for dental plans, leaving patients without the same assurances that their premium dollars will give them access to comprehensive dental care.
"Patients and employers need to know that they're getting value out of their premium dollars dedicated to dental care," said CDA President
Under the bill, dental plans that fail to meet the MLR standards would be required to provide rebates or lower premiums to dental plan purchasers as medical plans currently do. As a result of the MLR for medical plans, enrollees have already seen billions of dollars in benefits through rebates and reduced premiums.
"Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, health insurers have to spend more patient dollars to cover medical care rather than overhead. Dental insurers should do the same," said Skinner. "AB 1962 will ensure dental plans have similar limits on overhead, so more funding is available for dental care."
A report commissioned by CDA, "Dental Loss Ratio: Factors to Consider in Establishing a Minimum Loss Ratio for
"We know on the medical side that the minimum loss ratio produced substantial consumer benefits as well as administrative efficiencies for insurance companies," said Stephens. "We're confident these same protections can be provided to all patients with dental coverage. In fact, the state's Healthy Families Program required insurance companies to adhere to minimum loss ratios for the dental coverage they offered."
In addition to Assemblymember Skinner who introduced AB 1962, the bill is co-authored by Assemblymembers
The bill will be assigned to the Assembly Health Committee for a future hearing.
[Category: Medical]
TNS 24KuanRap-140221 30FurigayJof-4644354 30FurigayJof
| Copyright: | (c) 2014 Targeted News Service |
| Wordcount: | 500 |



Virginia GOP: Election Year Hypocrisy: Mark Warner Suddenly Concerned About Obamacare’s Medicare Advantage Cuts He Repeatedly Supported
Simmons College to Host Public Forums on National Health Care Reform, Feb. 25, April 3 & 14
Advisor News
- Retirement Reimagined: This generation says it’s no time to slow down
- The Conversation Gap: Clients tuning out on advisor health care discussions
- Wall Street executives warn Trump: Stop attacking the Fed and credit card industry
- Americans have ambitious financial resolutions for 2026
- FSI announces 2026 board of directors and executive committee members
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Retirees drive demand for pension-like income amid $4T savings gap
- Reframing lifetime income as an essential part of retirement planning
- Integrity adds further scale with blockbuster acquisition of AIMCOR
- MetLife Declares First Quarter 2026 Common Stock Dividend
- Using annuities as a legacy tool: The ROP feature
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Health insurance enrollment deadline extended
- Fresno Unified broke lifetime benefits promise after 2023 decision, retirees say
- More Texans have signed up for ACA health coverage despite expiring subsidies and falling national enrollment
- Military personnel, families can receive free test for cancer
- Health insurance costs putting squeeze on North Attleboro budget
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News