Will Consumers Flock To Proposed Health Law?
Younger consumers with lower incomes could be the big losers in the health care reform plan announced by House Republicans earlier this week. And insurance agents and brokers still could be hit in the wallets as well.
Under the GOP proposal, known as the American Health Care Act (AHCA), individuals with low-to-moderate incomes will no longer receive cost-sharing subsidies to help cover deductibles. Instead, people will be able to make much higher contributions to tax-sheltered health savings accounts, to cover deductibles and copayments.
In addition, tax credits used to help individuals and families purchase coverage will be based mainly on age instead of on income. Tax credits would be gradually phased down for individuals making more than $75,000, or married couples earning more than $150,000.
Most significant for insurance agents and brokers, the Republican health care plan did not remove the agent’s compensation from the medical loss ratio calculation.
The GOP proposal also does not permanently repeal the Cadillac tax, a provision that agent organizations including the National Association of Health Underwriters sought to get rid of.
“While we are disappointed that the AHCA does not permanently repeal the ACA’s ‘Cadillac tax’ on high-cost health plans, we are pleased that it will be delayed until 2025,” NAHU CEO Janet Trautwein said in a statement. "This levy does nothing to rein in actual health care costs, the true driver of the cost of coverage.”
Other changes that the AHCA would make to the current health care are a matter of “branding,” said Mike Stahl, senior vice president of HealthMarkets, one of the nation’s largest independent health insurance agencies.
For example, the AHCA removes the individual mandate but incentivizes people to sign up for coverage by allowing insurers to impose a 30 percent surcharge for not maintaining continuous coverage.
“So the mandate is gone but you have a surcharge. Basically, it’s the same concept for requiring people to be covered, but with different wording or branding,” Stahl said.
Fewer people could end up being enrolled in coverage under the new proposal, said Laura Adams, senior insurance analyst at insuranceQuotes.com. “The repeal of the individual mandate could mean that consumers who think they don’t need health insurance and don’t want to buy it will have the perception that it’s no longer required. In addition, some people will still be able to get tax credits to make insurance affordable to them, but for many, they won’t get the kind of subsidy they currently qualify for. So for some people, this means coverage will not be as affordable as it is.”
The tax credits would go to more people than are receiving them under the current law. But the GOP proposal would provide less financial help to lower-income people, according to Larry Levitt, senior vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Kim Buckey, health care regulations expert with DirectPath, said she believed a more immediate effect of the proposed health care law would be a run on enrollments, “since it may be harder to get coverage under the new plan.”
She also predicted premiums would increase under the proposed plan.
You’re going to see older, sicker people enrolling, which drives costs up,” she said. “And continuing coverage for dependents to age 26 and keeping coverage for those with pre-existing conditions is expensive. And a lot depends on whether insurers come back to the individual market.”
Susan Rupe is managing editor for InsuranceNewsNet. She formerly served as communications director for an insurance agents' association and was an award-winning newspaper reporter and editor. Contact her at [email protected].
© Entire contents copyright 2017 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.
Susan Rupe is editor in chief, magazine, for InsuranceNewsNet. She formerly served as communications director for an insurance agents' association and was an award-winning newspaper reporter and editor. Contact her at [email protected].




TrumpCare Fallout: HSAs Become Key Part of Retirement Plan
Security Class-Action Suits Rise; Settlement Figures Stagnate
Advisor News
- Midlife planning for women: why it matters and how advisors should adapt
- Tax anxiety is real, although few have a plan to address it
- Trump targets ‘retirement gap’ with new executive order
- Younger investors are engaged and advisors must adapt
- Plugging the hidden budget leaks of retirement
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to Calix Re Limited
- Transamerica introduces new RILA with optional income features
- Transamerica introduces RILA with optional income features
- American Life expands into Wyoming and Mississippi markets
- Knighthead Life Enters U.S. Fixed Indexed Annuity Market
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Four-part Medicare education series planned at Viroqua library
- Florida state employee health insurance premiums frozen for 2026-27
- Health insurer settles $5M ‘deceptive marketing’ lawsuit with Mass. AG
- Why are rates going up?
- REPUBLICANS DID THAT: Millions of Americans Drop ACA Coverage After GOP Allowed Tax Credits to Expire
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Transamerica agrees to $57M settlement in cost-of-insurance lawsuit
- The next step for AI in insurance — partnerships to scale
- Your clients are sitting on underused assets
- National Life Group Names Jason Doiron CEO of NLG Capital to Lead the Next Phase of Growth
- Life insurance sales surge 7% in 2025, but the work isn’t over
More Life Insurance News