Washington State’s New LTC Program Hit With Class Action Lawsuit
Three businesses and six individuals who oppose a mandatory payroll tax to fund Washington state’s new long-term care program filed a class action lawsuit in federal court this week.
The suit seeks to stop the January start of the payroll premium for most employees in the state.
None of the individuals who filed the suit in the federal court for the Western District of Washington purchased a private, long-term care insurance plan before Nov. 1, the deadline to qualify for an exemption to the payroll tax.
The WA Cares Fund requires workers in Washington state to pay a premium of 0.58% of their total pay per paycheck, meaning an employee with a salary of $50,000 will pay $290 a year into the fund.
Beginning Jan. 1, 2025, people who need assistance with at least three activities of daily living can tap into the fund to pay for in-home care, home modifications, home-delivered meals and transportation to medical appointments. Unpaid family caregivers also can be reimbursed through the fund.
The lifetime maximum benefit is $36,500, with annual increases to be determined based on inflation.
The benefit is not portable, so workers who pay into the program but move outside of Washington state will not be able to access it. In addition, the program covers only the taxpayers, not a spouse or dependent. The benefit also is not available to those who work in Washington but live in neighboring states.
The lawsuit contends that the fund violates a federal law forbidding the state from passing any law requiring employees to participate in a plan that provides sickness or medical benefits. It also contends that the law violates the Equal Protection and the Privileges and Immunities clauses of the U.S. Constitution by its disparate treatment of people who pay the tax but don’t receive benefits if they are not a Washington state resident.
In addition, the suit contends that people who are within 10 years of retirement will pay into the fund but not receive benefits, a violation of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act.


3 Strategies For Brokers To Stand Out In A Crowded Market
Equitable Expands Annuity Offering
Advisor News
- Berkeley arts tax heads toward passage while public bank measure looks likely to fail
- Americans’ sense of overall prosperity still ticks upward
- Turning expanded eligibility into a better coverage plan for federal clients
- Election 2026: Which of Berkeley's 7 ballot measures will pass?
- How advisors can help frugal retirees finally enjoy their savings
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Knighthead Annuity & Life Assurance Company and Merit Life Insurance Co.
- Jackson reports record annuity sales, increases share repurchase authorization
- Why the market doesn’t need more carriers
- Equitable, Corebridge steam toward merger with strong Q3 annuity sales
- Jackson Announces New Annuity Offering for AARP Members
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Kirksville school board to meet Friday on benefits association agreement, 2027 health insurance rates
- GOVERNOR LAMONT AND INSURANCE COMMISSIONER HERSHMAN ENCOURAGE RESIDENTS TO REVIEW HEALTH COVERAGE OPTIONS DURING OPEN ENROLLMENT
- ACA premium increases in double digits for second year
- The percentage of people without health insurance is growing
- Health agents victorious against CMS moratorium
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Prudential earnings dip as Japan sales suspension offsets U.S. growth
- U-Haul Holding Company Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2027 Financial Results
- Genworth Financial Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Knighthead Annuity & Life Assurance Company and Merit Life Insurance Co.
- Why the market doesn’t need more carriers
More Life Insurance News