Washington State’s New LTC Program Hit With Class Action Lawsuit
Three businesses and six individuals who oppose a mandatory payroll tax to fund Washington state’s new long-term care program filed a class action lawsuit in federal court this week.
The suit seeks to stop the January start of the payroll premium for most employees in the state.
None of the individuals who filed the suit in the federal court for the Western District of Washington purchased a private, long-term care insurance plan before Nov. 1, the deadline to qualify for an exemption to the payroll tax.
The WA Cares Fund requires workers in Washington state to pay a premium of 0.58% of their total pay per paycheck, meaning an employee with a salary of $50,000 will pay $290 a year into the fund.
Beginning Jan. 1, 2025, people who need assistance with at least three activities of daily living can tap into the fund to pay for in-home care, home modifications, home-delivered meals and transportation to medical appointments. Unpaid family caregivers also can be reimbursed through the fund.
The lifetime maximum benefit is $36,500, with annual increases to be determined based on inflation.
The benefit is not portable, so workers who pay into the program but move outside of Washington state will not be able to access it. In addition, the program covers only the taxpayers, not a spouse or dependent. The benefit also is not available to those who work in Washington but live in neighboring states.
The lawsuit contends that the fund violates a federal law forbidding the state from passing any law requiring employees to participate in a plan that provides sickness or medical benefits. It also contends that the law violates the Equal Protection and the Privileges and Immunities clauses of the U.S. Constitution by its disparate treatment of people who pay the tax but don’t receive benefits if they are not a Washington state resident.
In addition, the suit contends that people who are within 10 years of retirement will pay into the fund but not receive benefits, a violation of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act.



3 Strategies For Brokers To Stand Out In A Crowded Market
Equitable Expands Annuity Offering
Advisor News
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
- Taxing trend: How the OBBBA is breaking the standard deduction reliance
- Why advisors can’t afford to delay succession planning
- 6 in 10 Americans struggle with financial decisions
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- An uninsurance bomb is about to go off, and it will touch Orange County
- Many Virginians drop ACA coverage
- Legislature advances bill limiting copays for Medicaid
- Beshear critical of Medicaid provisions in state budget bill
- Advocates call for hearing about Geisinger-Risant insurance condition change request
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: KATHLEEN COULOMBE JOINS ACU AS CHIEF ADVOCACY OFFICER
- A-CAP Appoints Kirk Cullimore as President of Sentinel Security Life
- Nationwide enters centennial year stronger than ever
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CMB Wing Lung Insurance Company Limited
More Life Insurance News