Federal appeals court to hear ESG rule arguments in July
A New Orleans federal appeals court is scheduled to hear arguments the week of July 8 on whether the Biden administration's ESG rule meets the legal standard.
The U.S. Appeals Court for the Fifth Circuit is well known for its narrow, conservative interpretation of federal rulemaking. Twenty five state attorneys general are leading the appeal from a lower-court ruling upholding the ESG rule.
The Fifth Circuit notably tossed out the Obama administration's fiduciary rule in 2018.
The ESG rule addresses what fiduciaries can consider when making plan investments and outlines that they may, but are not required to, consider ESG [environmental, social, and governance] factors when evaluating plan investments.
In addition, the rule permits fiduciaries to use collateral factors as a tiebreaker between two or more investments when both investments equally serve the interests of the plan and for fiduciaries to use qualified default investment alternatives that use consider nonfinancial factors, if it is a prudent investment.
In addition to the 25 AGs, the plaintiffs included Liberty Energy, Inc., an energy company, and three individuals, while the defendant was then-DOL Secretary Marty Walsh.
Plaintiffs say that the department’s ESG rule undermines key protections for retirement savings and oversteps the department’s statutory authority under a 1974 law known as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which governs a broad range of retirement and health benefit plans.
The lawsuit claims the ESG rule is “arbitrary and capricious” and a violation of both ERISA and the Administrative Procedure Act. U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk threw out their lawsuit on Sept. 21.
As Politico reported in a recent story, the politically ripe ESG issue is set to land in multiple courts over the coming months. Judges in at least six states will weigh in on a wide range of ESG litigation this year.
The Labor Department's ESG rule bounced from the Trump administration to Biden’s. The final rule that went into effect Jan. 30, 2023 peeled off some of the provisions that opponents found objectionable, but not enough for the plaintiffs.
No 'risky holdings'
Meanwhile, House Republicans are floating another bill to ban ESG investing, this one introduced by Rep. Greg Murphy, R-NC.
The “Safeguarding Investment Options for Retirement Act” would prohibit tax-advantaged retirement plan trustees from considering factors other than financial risk and return in investment choices on behalf of workers, retirees, and their beneficiaries. The bill remains in the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Americans’ nest eggs should be built on a solid foundation that confers the greatest growth probability, not investments that are unstable and whitewashed with fake ethical and sustainability scores," Murphy said in a news release. "Such an endeavor may be noble for those willing to pursue it independently but not managed plans that millions rely on for retirement.”
In its reply filed in March, the DOL denied that it is sanctioning the selection of poorer-performing investments in the name of ESG. In fact, doing so would expressly violate a bulletin the department sent to fiduciaries.
"An investment would 'not be prudent,' the bulletin explained, “if it would provide a plan with a lower expected rate of return than available alternative investments with commensurate degrees of risk or is riskier than alternative available investments with commensurate rates of return,” the DOL pointed out in its brief.
InsuranceNewsNet Senior Editor John Hilton covered business and other beats in more than 20 years of daily journalism. John may be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @INNJohnH.
© Entire contents copyright 2024 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.
InsuranceNewsNet Senior Editor John Hilton has covered business and other beats in more than 20 years of daily journalism. John may be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @INNJohnH.




Health-based actuarial longevity: The starting point for retirement planning
Medical Debt Cancellation Act: Temporary relief but the root cause is still there
Advisor News
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- How to listen to what your client isn’t saying
- Strong underwriting: what it means for insurers and advisors
- Retirement is increasingly defined by a secure income stream
- Addressing the ‘menopause tax:’ A guide for advisors with female clients
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual turns 175, Marking Generations of Delivering on its Commitments
- ALIRT Insurance Research: U.S. Life Insurance Industry In Transition
- My Annuity Store Launches a Free AI Annuity Research Assistant Trained on 146 Carrier Brochures and Live Annuity Rates
- Ameritas settles with Navy vet in lawsuit over disputed annuity sale
- NAIC annuity guidance updates divide insurance and advisory groups
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Business People: General Mills veteran Dana McNabb named COO
- CONFEREES ADOPT COMMERCE PACKAGE WITH MEAT RAFFLE INCREASE, NO INSURANCE LOOPHOLE FIX
- GLP-1 Drug Costs Cited as Heights Schools Hike Taxes and Cut Staff
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- Column: N.C.’s Medicaid ‘compromise’ comes at a cruel cost
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- 2025 Insurance Abstracts
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska and First Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company
- Generational expectations: A challenge for the industry
- Greg Lindberg asks NC judge for no jail time in bribery, fraud cases
- National Life Group Names Brenda Betts to Its Board of Directors
More Life Insurance News