The ‘Bengen Rule’ Comes Into Question
By Cyril Tuohy
In 1994, financial advisor William P. Bengen published data on what he deemed the “safe withdrawal” amount that would ensure investors had enough money to last them until they died. In the years since, his research has been widely cited and circulated by industry wonks, advisors and customers, and is considered a benchmark for retirement savings.
Bengen's 4 percent rule was an answer to a vexing question at that time: How much can I withdraw from my investments so I don’t run out of money during retirement? Bengen’s research found that a “safe withdrawal” was about 4 percent of the starting portfolio value, a number which has “stood the test of time,” he said.
Bengen raised that “safe withdrawal” percentage by half a percentage point to 4.5 percent in the wake of subsequent research.
For year,s financial advisors used the 4 percent yardstick to gently steer clients down the retirement glide path. The Bengen Rule eventually became to retirement withdrawals what autopilots have become to airplanes.
But research out earlier this year from a trio of respected academics has come to challenge the Bengen Rule, saying 4 percent withdrawal is wholly inadequate.
Whether the Bengen Rule still holds up in such a low interest rate environment and whether planners will shift their strategy has been the talk of the financial advisor community, said advisor Joseph A. Tomlinson, principal of Tomlinson Financial Planning in Greenville, Maine.
What was the impetus for the challenge to the Bengen Rule? Interest rates are the big culprit. In late 1994, the 10-year Treasury was yielding nearly 8 percent. Late last month, the 10-year Treasury yield stood at 2.48 percent, near record lows.
With those rock bottom rates where they are today, the Bengen Rule appears to be way off due to the return investors can expect on their assets.
“In most other countries, sustainable initial withdrawal rates fell below 4 percent,” conclude researchers Michael Finke, Wade D. Pfau and David M. Blanchett. “We find there is nothing inherently safe about the 4 percent rule.”
The researchers published their findings earlier this year in a paper titled “The 4 Percent Rule Is Not Safe in a Low-Yield World.”
Bengen, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology-trained aeronautics engineer and principal of Bengen Financial Services, was on vacation and could not be reached for comment.
Pfau, a professor of retirement income at The American College in Bryn Mawr, Pa.; Finke, a professor and PhD coordinator in the Department of Personal Financial Planning at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas, and Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar Investment Management Finance in Chicago, said the 4 percent rule is in fact due to an anomaly of U.S. historical data.
“For the data used in William Bengen’s pioneering study on safe withdrawal rates, the average real return on bonds was 2.6 percent,” wrote Pfau and his colleagues, referring to the after-inflation "real" investment yield. “Sustainable retirement withdrawal simulation assumes this real rate of return on bond investments within a portfolio. At the start of 2013, real bond yields are much lower.”
Pfau recommends a withdrawal rate of around 3 percent given the low interest rate environment, but a 3 percent withdrawal rate over the length of a retirement will also mean needing a nest egg 40 percent bigger to withdraw an equivalent amount of dollars as a 4 percent rate allows. For those saving for retirement in an uncertain economy, gathering assets at that rate is a challenge.
“In the absence of some added income protection, there is a high likelihood that low yields will require planners to rethink their safety of a traditional investment-based retirement income plan,” Pfau and his colleagues concluded.
Cyril Tuohy is a writer based in Pennsylvania. He has covered the financial services industry for more than 15 years. He can be reached at [email protected].
© Entire contents copyright 2013 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.
Cyril Tuohy is a writer based in Pennsylvania. He has covered the financial services industry for more than 15 years. He can be reached at [email protected].


Regulators OK Athene/Aviva Deal
Why Estate Planning And Life Insurance Still Matter
Advisor News
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
- Poor money habits are a dealbreaker in a new relationship
- DC plan sponsors see opportunity in alternatives
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- The next growth phase in life/annuities depends on modernization
- CA judge certifies class action in teachers’ lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
- AM Best Managing Director Joins ‘Target Topics’ Podcast to Discuss State of Delegated Underwriting Authority Enterprises Market
- KBRA Assigns Rating to TruSpire Retirement Insurance Company
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Doctors 'Cringe' At Possibility Of Documenting Which Medicaid Enrollees Too Sick To Work
- They harvest the nation’s food, but a new rule may strip them of health insurance
- Health insurers hedge on Trump-backed pledge to improve denials process
- CONGRESSMAN DESAULNIER INTRODUCES BILL TO PROTECT WORKERS FROM WRONGFUL HEALTH CLAIM DENIALS
- Walla Walla residents drop health insurance because of affordability under Trump
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- The next growth phase in life/annuities depends on modernization
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to MAAGAP Insurance Inc.
- Critical care riders: the living benefit more clients should understand
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
More Life Insurance News