Dec. 13, 2010 -- A federal district judge in Virginia ruled the health coverage mandate unconstitutional, but refused to freeze implementation of the law, according to media reports.
Judge Henry E. Hudson in a 42-page opinion said the law’s requirement that most Americans obtain health insurance exceeds the regulatory authority granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, according to The New York Times. Insurance companies had demanded the mandate in exchange for dropping all exclusions and agreeing to universal coverage. Insurers argued that without the mandate, healthy people would opt out, leaving companies with the sickest and most expensive people in the pool.
The Virginia case, which was filed by the state’s attorney general, is one of dozens of lawsuits to challenge health care reform. This is the first decision against the law and appeals are expected to work their way up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Obama: Tax Deal Good for American People
States Ready ‘Source of Funds’ Rules
Advisor News
- Your client’s $3 million portfolio doesn’t tell you their insurance needs
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
- Looking out for clients with diminished mental capacity
- House panel advances CLEAR Forms Act backed by IRI
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News