What derailed LSU’s lucrative health care software deal? Conflicts of interest, in-house arguing, more
It was an arrangement LSU President
Though contracts were signed by Alexander -- and about
The Louisiana Legislative Auditor -- who was asked in April by Alexander to examine the complicated deal after internal LSU auditors raised questions -- blamed the failure on LSU managers who purposely circumvented the protocols established by the university's Offices of Technology Management. Instead, they created a business structure in which the university would license the software through an affiliated nonprofit that contracted with a private, for-profit firm to handle the sales.
Nobody claims LSU administrators or members of the
Under LSU's initial setup for the deal,
Haydel, a health care policy expert, told The Advocate she was unaware of the law that prohibits family members from doing business with the agency where a relative works. Haydel said she was just helping out at the request of LSU administrators, adding that she was not paid for her service on the private company board, transacted no business and quit upon the advice of an LSU administrator before any contract was finalized. Haydel said she did as was requested without asking for elaboration.
Alexander, through the LSU media affairs office, stated he was made aware Haydel was a HarmonIQ director during the audit process. He had asked the legislative auditor to investigate the arrangements in general and agreed with the subsequent recommendations to tighten LSU's procedures to ensure administrators follow intellectual property licensing protocols. The audit, released in June, said the arrangements created "potential conflicts of interest" but didn't specifically name members of the LSU Board who were on LaHIT or Haydel's involvement with HarmonIQ.
Legislative Auditor
The state's Code of Governmental Ethics forbids family members from contracting with a related public servant's agency, noted Ethics Board Administrator
LSU supervisor and management involvement on the boards of affiliated nonprofits, like LaHIT, is routine. Moore would have had to recuse himself from any
But the LSU Board was never asked to vote on the effort, including on the deal's three agreements, which weakened LSU's "ability to make appropriate decisions," according to the auditor. The 16-member board, which is supposed to have final say on LSU transactions, sets policy, approves hiring and authorizes spending for nine institutions, including the flagship
Purpera said recently that he wanted to look further into LaHIT. One question he'd like answered is why wording that would have given the university a 40 percent equity stake in HarmonIQ, the terms both sides agreed to, wasn't included in the final contract. The signed contract gave LSU 5% of the software's royalties instead of the usual 40-50 percent.
"Nobody seems to know why," Purpera said.
Computer personnel for the
Leading the effort for LSU was Dr.
Opelka said lawyers and administrators, not he, came up with the plan to create an affiliated nonprofit foundation to contract with a private firm for the sale of the software and to hold onto the profits for the university's benefit rather than seeing the money swept into the state's general fund.
At end of
The LaHIT board was chaired by Opelka and included Haydel;
Haydel doesn't recall exactly when in 2016 she resigned from both boards. But she said she had nothing to do with any transactions.
"I never saw any contracts," Haydel said.
She said she joined the boards at Opelka's request and left when he told her that legal counsel had advised that she do so.
Haydel said she was never informed that her participation with HarmonIQ violated ethics laws. "No one has ever called me or asked about it or indicated that there were any ethics violations," Haydel said.
Opelka said he spoke with LSU lawyers about whom to add to the boards before doing so. He added that when the lawyers later said Haydel and other the LSU-linked directors should step down from LaHIT and HarmonIQ boards, he passed along that information to the board members.
In
Moore did not return two calls seeking comment.
Moore, who transitioned from running a family-owned oil company to an investment firm, was appointed to the
Moore is a major contributor to Republican candidates and causes. He is a leading backer of
___
(c)2019 The Advocate, Baton Rouge, La.
Visit The Advocate, Baton Rouge, La. at www.theadvocate.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


North American Health Headlines at 4:18 p.m. EDT
North American Science Headlines at 7:15 p.m. EDT
Advisor News
- When new investment trends emerge, Gen Z is most likely generation to be first in
- Could ‘plain English’ become an advisor’s secret weapon?
- IRI urges Senate action on 403(b) parity legislation
- Three estate planning ideas to protect your clients and their wealth
- What advisors must know about accessible client documents
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
- Wink: Annuity sales post strong Q2, led by MYGAs and structured products
- Legacy Marketing Group partners with Malibu Life USA for annuity launch
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News