Upper Mississippi, Illinois & Missouri Rivers Association Issues Public Comment on FEMA Proposed Rule
* * *
Please accept these comments regarding the
I am writing on behalf of the Upper Mississippi,
Our organization has 66 years of experience in speaking as one voice for those living, working, and investing in the
Flood fighting is essential to minimizing the loss of life and damage to property, yet flood fighting is costly to levee districts, which depend upon FEMA Public Assistance. Changes to the rules that govern how this much-needed assistance is provided will have serious negative economic impacts on local levee districts and local governments and ultimately harm the people already reeling from the actual disasters.
The proposed changes will unfairly harm rural communities.
Rural levee districts are already challenged to meet the current requirements to qualify for emergency Public Assistance. The proposed changes will make it much more unlikely that rural areas will even be given the chance to apply let alone actually receive any funding. By increasing the per capita indicator from
The use of Total Taxable Resources (TTR) in the calculation of the "Estimated Cost of Assistance" raises serious equity issues for rural communities. The use of the TTR gives higher weight to those areas of the country that have higher real estate costs. For example, the higher the real estate value, the higher the value of the taxable resource, and the higher the "benefit" when compared to the cost of the project.
We believe that the use of TTR will shift Public Assistance away from low-income and rural communities who have lower property values. We have seen this outcome with other federal agencies who use benefit-cost ratios similar to TTR. Similarly, the TTR may permanently shift the financial burden of disaster response and recovery to communities that are poor or underserved who cannot afford to take on additional burdens. These communities already have disproportionate impacts from disasters, and now the capacity to restore and recover these communities will be even more disproportionately damaged. In the end this rule change will unfairly penalize people based solely on where they live.
The timing of these proposed changes is terrible.
State and local governments are continuing to struggle financially from the COVID-19 pandemic and the results of the forced government shutdowns. It is devastating to withdraw or significantly reduce the amount of federal assistance that has been relied upon for many years during this difficult time in our economy. Also, many states and local jurisdictions around the country are currently still working through recovery from the many recent disasters, and in some cases, trying to clear backlogs of PA from many years past, while citizens are still suffering the aftereffects of these events.
The loss of access to FEMA Public Assistance is deeply concerning considering the anticipated increasing flood events in the
This proposal would suddenly and dramatically limit state and local governments' ability to qualify for desperately needed Public Assistance (PA) funding.
Under the proposal unless an unrealistically high dollar damage threshold is reached, i.e., an average increase nationally of 57.5%, or for the 6 most populous states an average of 72.66%, these states and locales will have to bear the burden of recovering from disaster alone. Under this proposal, most states would not be eligible for PA funding unless a disaster is considered severely catastrophic. For example, the proposal estimates that up to 72.66 percent of states and localities who experience a disaster a year would not be eligible for disaster recovery funds.
This would be devastating for communities who continue to deal with the COVID-19 crisis, as well as the resulting recession.
It is especially troubling that
* Applicants would need to invest more in response recovery, and mitigation capabilities.
* Damaged facilities may not be repaired or replaced and could be susceptible to future disasters.
As levee districts in the
UMIMRA urges several changes be made to the proposed rule.
These proposed changes would be disastrous for the Upper Mississippi. UMIMRA urges
Both FEMA Region V and VII were part of the 2008 Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Plan that recommended permanent flood control improvements, yet these improvements have yet to receive federal authorization and appropriations. In the meantime, the
Thank you for the opportunity to offer comments on this proposal and for your consideration on this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Upper
(217) 653-8456; [email protected]
* * *
The proposed rule can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2020-0038-0001
TARGETED NEWS SERVICE (founded 2004) features non-partisan 'edited journalism' news briefs and information for news organizations, public policy groups and individuals; as well as 'gathered' public policy information, including news releases, reports, speeches. For more information contact
Sny Island Levee Drainage District Issues Public Comment on FEMA Proposed Rule
Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers Issues Public Comment on Health Resources & Services Administration Proposed Rule
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News