UnitedHealth ordered to pay $165M for deceiving costumers
Campbell said Monday her office has obtained a favorable order from
The court order is believed to impose the largest total of civil penalties in an action brought by the attorney general's office under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act.
Notably, in light of evidence that the defendants intentionally targeted "vulnerable consumers who could least afford their products," the court found that the companies' deceptive conduct was "particularly egregious," according to information released by Campbell.
"For years, the defendants preyed on financially vulnerable individuals, deceiving them into buying products they didn't need or couldn't afford. This order holds the companies accountable and will provide meaningful restitution to consumers across the Commonwealth," said Campbell.
The companies are based in
UnitedHealth officials said they would appeal the judgment, according to a company statement also released Monday.
"We disagree with the
The order follows a
In
The court found that the companies deceived consumers both about their sales agents and the insurance products they were selling; deceptively advertised claims that their sales agents were objective and that they represented all insurance carriers; and that the companies' claims of objectivity were untrue and that the agents "did not, in fact, represent all health insurance licensed in
The Court also found that the defendants' sales agents deceptively passed off separate, supplemental health insurance policies (which provide less-comprehensive coverage than major medical insurance), such as specified disease insurance, as part of or included with major medical insurance in a variety of ways, including providing health insurance quotes that contained a single price, which combined the premiums for major medical insurance and the supplemental health insurance.
On
Campbell said the court found that the defendants engaged in widespread misrepresentations of supplemental health insurance that they sold in
Based on their widespread misrepresentations, the court ordered the health care companies to pay back over
Further hearings can be held to award the state reasonable costs incurred from the investigation, attorney's fees and other relief, according to Campbell.
According to information posted on its website, "
Follow staff reporter


Americans’ rage at insurers goes beyond health coverage
Top Fed official backs new rate cuts even if Trump tariffs materialize
Advisor News
- Addressing the longevity paradox
- Employers shift focus from retirement access to financial outcomes
- Helping widowed clients navigate their new financial reality
- Navigating client communication in a digital age
- Can your advisory firm survive without you?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Farm Bureau P&C insurers post first underwriting gain since 2021
- Legacy Marketing, Malibu Life launch two fixed indexed annuities
- Changing client priorities are reshaping annuity conversations
- Solen Software acquires annuity software provider Cooperative Technologies
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Oxbridge Health to Save Employers as Much as 25% on Health Benefits in 2027
- Navitus MedicareRx (PDP) earns top federal rating for 11th consecutive year
- How California can stop making health insurance more expensive
- MIDTERM ELECTION UPDATE: MEDICAID CHANGES
- What’s behind the growth of CHOICE arrangements?
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News