UnitedHealth Group ordered to pay $165 million over deceptive sales practices
The judge’s order, announced this month by the attorney general in
The case dealt with allegations of cheating consumers and violating consumer protection laws primarily during the years leading up to 2019, when
“For years, the defendants preyed on financially vulnerable individuals, deceiving them into buying products they didn’t need or couldn’t afford,” Attorney General
“We disagree with the
The case dealt with what are known as “supplemental” health plans, where patients receive a lump sum of money if they suffer certain triggering health problems.
These policies sometimes are known as “dread disease” coverage, with names like “cancer-only” or “critical illness,” where patients with certain major medical issues receive cash payouts they can use for any purpose. The benefits are distinct from health insurance policies that cover the cost of medical and hospital services and are the mainstay at UnitedHealthcare, the massive health benefits division at
Judge
The judge found evidence that beginning in 2012 and continuing through 2016, if not later, the company bundled supplemental health plans with traditional insurance coverage so that clients didn’t know they were buying the supplemental coverage.
“Agents used marketing materials that showed consumers a single premium for a combination of major medical and supplemental policies, hid the name Chesapeake from consumers and ... bundled policies together with a single quote,” the judge wrote. “Agents were trained to hide the costs for the individual policies so customers did not understand what they were purchasing.”
Civil penalties also were warranted, the judge wrote, for company web pages with false representations that agents provided objective guidance. She found the company also sent an automated email deceptively asserting that agents could offer a wide variety of options from numerous companies.
Kazanjian ordered about
Supplemental health plans have been controversial over the years, with critics saying they pay out a much lower share of premiums to consumers than regulations require of traditional health insurers.
In her order, Kazanjian quoted a health economist and expert witness for the defense who testified that consumers benefit from these health plans not solely due to claims they actually receive, but also from “the peace of mind from knowing that they will be financially covered if a triggering event occurs.”
The economist conceded, however, “that a consumer is not likely to receive peace of mind from a product that they unknowingly purchased,” the judge wrote.
©2025 The Minnesota Star Tribune. Visit startribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC
California Dems Propose ‘Slush Fund’ To ‘Trump-Proof’ Illegal Migrants From Deportation Amid Deadly Wildfires
McCaughey: Shake up U.S. health policy
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News