These Californians say health insurance is expensive, unnecessary. Will new tax credits help?
Nearly four out of every 10 uninsured residents, or 37 percent of those surveyed, said the price of insurance was the leading reason for not having coverage in 2018. About 17 percent of people said they didn't believe in or need health insurance.
The findings came as no surprise to some health providers and policy experts who said the cost of health care remains an underlying challenge in
However, a number of new laws aimed at shoring up the state's health insurance exchange could provide some relief, they said.
Gov.
It remains to be seen if this mix of policy solutions, which do not apply to employer-provided coverage, will be enough to nudge the state's stagnant uninsured rate down further.
"The state has created these new premium subsidies that are going to bring down the monthly cost of buying health insurance through Covered California," said
But most Californians still access health insurance through their employers, where premiums, deductibles and out-of-pocket costs have continued to rise in recent years, far outpacing wage gains. Workers who are eligible for insurance through their employer do not qualify for the Covered California subsidies.
"The bottom line for employees is that they pay more and more," said
He added that it's now routine for an individual or a family to have to pay thousands of dollars on their deductible for certain medical services before they can use their coverage. Brennan said it's one of the shortcomings of the Affordable Care Act, which prioritized offering coverage over cost control.
"That's not really insurance in the traditional sense," he said. "It's more like catastrophic coverage -- if something really bad happens to you, then the coverage kicks in."
Insurance coverage stalled
After years of steady declines, the state's uninsured rate has stalled out at about 7 percent, according to the latest census data. As many as 3.5 million people younger than 65 are expected to remain uninsured by 2022, including undocumented residents, according to the latest estimates from
"This is really affecting people who are low income and middle class, tremendously," said
Marshall said the
The uninsured rate is closer to 50 percent at its
Many of the uninsured come from the area's farming communities or work at small businesses, she said. Marshall said their reasons for not having insurance vary, from cost to immigration status and potential changes to the "public charge" rule that could deny green cards to immigrants who use public programs.
"A large number of our uninsured are immigrants, so the public charge rule really impacts people's enrollment in benefits," Marshall said.
The new reforms, in some ways, are designed to patch weak spots.
The financial assistance from the state comes with a hefty price: More than
Although it's not the largest group of uninsured residents, people who lose their
A single mother, for example, who earns
"We refer to it as the churn -- that area around 138 percent of the federal poverty level where people are getting employment and picking up commercial coverage," said
"They go into that category, but it's very hard for them to find something to afford."
Nearly 80 percent of WellSpace's 70,000 patients use
However, undocumented residents have limited access to taxpayer-funded insurance programs. They are not eligible for Covered California plans, and, even with recently passed legislation, only those under 26 in
Tax penalty solution
Health providers and policymakers hope that with the size of premium increases in Covered California plans shrinking, and in some cases premiums declining, more people will buy coverage. Exchange plans will see an average rate increase of less than 1 percent in 2020, projections show.
If that doesn't work, the state's new tax penalty for people without insurance might motivate some holdouts. The law goes into effect in January and will cost families as much as
Covered
The federal individual mandate, before it was repealed by a tax reform law passed by
Will the state's new penalty be any different?
"What's important to understand about the (federal health law) penalty is it was never given a chance to work because it phased in over three years," Levitis said. "It started off really small in 2014 and 2015, and finally, in 2016, it reached its full size."
The repeal went into effect this year.
"It's hard to say we got any real results from the experiment with the federal individual mandate. It was never really given a chance to see what it will do," he said.
Levitis said
"(
___
(c)2019 The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, Calif.)
Visit The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, Calif.) at www.sacbee.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Andrew Ballard Joins Lowers Risk Group as Vice President of International Markets
Consumer Confidence Shoots Up In Latest IBD/TIPP Poll
Advisor News
- House panel advances CLEAR Forms Act backed by IRI
- Modifying life insurance based on evolving needs
- Gen X faces ‘pension envy’ as they head into retirement
- Your client wants to cash out an annuity. Here’s what to consider
- How student loan debt impacts 401(k) balances
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A-Cap strikes back with lawsuit accusing SC regulators of sloppy process, leaking secrets
- AM Best to Discuss Its Views on Private Credit Surge and Risks at 2026 NAIC/NIPR Insurance Summit
- OID recovers $260M in life insurance benefits
- NUNN BILLS TO COMBAT PAYMENT SCAMS, CUT FINANCIAL RED TAPE PASS FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
- SS&C Black Diamond Expands Annuities & Insurance Marketplace with New Insurance Capabilities and Carriers
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News