Sen. Menendez Issues Remarks on Wright’s Confirmation as EPA Assistant Administrator
Immediately before
"I rise today to oppose the nomination of
"This position is of enormous consequence to the people of
"
"For many years, a lack of strong environmental protections and oversight left our communities vulnerable to unsafe, unchecked, unregulated pollution. I'm talking about the days before we had an
"Back then, big polluters had a blank check to contaminate our air, soil, and water with toxic chemicals. People across America were exposed to pesticides, lead, asbestos and other toxins through the air they breathed, the rivers they fished, the soil they farmed, and the land they built on. It was unhealthy, it was unsustainable, and in many cases it was downright dangerous.
"Indeed, it was 1980 - the same year a chemical waste facility in
"Today, Superfund is our primary tool for cleaning up the hazardous waste across America. It requires polluters to pay to clean up the sites they've contaminated. And it also funds the cleanup of 'orphan sites' for which the polluters responsible no longer exist.
"The Superfund program is a promise to our communities. A promise to hold polluters accountable for the damage they've done. A promise to rid our soil and water of toxic chemicals. A promise to transform toxic brownfields into safe, livable, usable land. A promise to protect the health of today's families, and of future generations.
"But that promise cannot be kept on its own. We the people must keep that promise. And one way we can do so is by ensuring leaders who oversee the Superfund program are willing to stand up to polluters, listen to the best science and hold big corporations accountable.
"Nothing in
"So for all the President's talk of draining the swamp, it's just that. TALK.
"Instead he did just the opposite. Consider Dow's Midland site in
"As Dow's self-styled "Dioxin Lawyer,"
"These accusations were leveled by federal regulators and whistleblowers alike. One independent lab found Dow used incomplete contamination data, leaving the risk of toxins going undetected.
"An internal whistleblower revealed Dow intentionally designed its data so that it couldn't be properly vetted by independent third parties. And in 2007 an
"But it wasn't only regulators that
"That included mailing out a newsletter to local residents downplaying the risks of dioxin to human health, which according to the
"This is appalling.
"
"Yet
"Finally, as if it wasn't enough to mislead the public, we now know that
"When I hear that
"
"Millions of people live within just a few miles of these sites, in
"And like those in
"These families - and millions of Americans nationwide - are depending on the
"The
Sen. Casey: PFAS Should Be Named a Hazardous Substance
House Oversight Committee Issues Testimony From Ex-Tennessee Deputy Governor Henry
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News