Revisions to Publication Requirements for Community Eligibility Status Information Under the National Flood Insurance Program
Final rule.
CFR Part: "44 CFR Parts 59 and 64"
RIN Number: "RIN 1660-AA92"
Citation: "85 FR 68782"
Document Number: "Docket ID FEMA-2019-0016"
Page Number: "68782"
"Rules and Regulations"
Agency: "
SUMMARY: This final rule modernizes regulations regarding publication requirements of community eligibility status information under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
DATES: This rule is effective
ADDRESSES: The docket for this rulemaking is available for inspection using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Discussion of the Rule The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (NFIA), Title 42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) 4001 et seq., authorizes the Administrator of
FOOTNOTE 1 See 42 U.S.C. 4011(a). END FOOTNOTE
FOOTNOTE 2 See 42 U.S.C. 4022(a)(1). END FOOTNOTE
FOOTNOTE 3 See 42 U.S.C. 4102(c). END FOOTNOTE
NFIP regulations at 44 CFR 64.6 provide a list of communities where the sale of flood insurance under the NFIP is authorized as set forth in Subpart B, "Eligibility Requirements," to part 59 of the regulations. Due to the large number of communities eligible for flood insurance and the relative frequency to changes to community eligibility, maintaining a list of communities in
On
The NPRM solicited public comment on these proposed changes.
II. Summary and Discussion of Public Comments
Of the six comments
A. The Community Status Book (CSB)
Three commenters provided feedback on the use of the CSB. One anonymous commenter [
FOOTNOTE 4 42 U.S.C. 4102. END FOOTNOTE
FOOTNOTE 5 42 U.S.C. 4012. END FOOTNOTE
B. Outreach
ASFPM also requested that
Additionally, the
C. Other Methods of Notice
One member of the public [
Finally, another member of the public [
FOOTNOTE 6 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (21st Century IDEA), Public Law 115-336, 132 Stat. 5025 (2018). END FOOTNOTE
III. Summary of Changes
The final rule removes the requirements contained in 44 CFR 59.24(a), (c), (d), and (e) that community loss of eligibility notices be published in the
Second, 44 CFR 64.6 is revised to remove the requirement that
IV. Regulatory Analysis
A. Executive Orders 12866, "Regulatory Planning and Review", 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review", and 13771, "Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs"
Executive Orders 13563 ("Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review") and 12866 ("Regulatory Planning and Review") direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 ("Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs") directs agencies to reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that "for every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process."
1. Need for Regulatory Action
Under the NFIA,
FOOTNOTE 7 See 42 U.S.C. 4022(a)(1). END FOOTNOTE
First,
Second,
These two changes will result in reduced
2. Baseline
Requirement To Publish Community Loss of Eligibility Notices in the
Community loss of eligibility notices were published a total of 246 times in the
Requirement To Publish the List of Eligible Communities in the CFR
With respect to the requirement for
FOOTNOTE 8 The Community Status Book is available for public viewing at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status-book. END FOOTNOTE
FOOTNOTE 9 Hourly rates derived from
3. Costs
Community Loss of Eligibility Notices: Internet Publication Costs
As a substitute for publishing the required community loss of eligibility notices in the
FOOTNOTE 10
The average 25 notices per year result in a burden to
FOOTNOTE 11
Table 1-Internet Publication Costs Year Initial internet Recurrent internet Internet publication burden publication burden publication (hours) (hours) cost (a) (b) = (0.25 x 25) (c) = (a x b) x ($ 63.64 x 1.46) 1 24 12.5$ 3,392 2 12.5 1,162 3 12.5 1,162 4 12.5 1,162 5 12.5 1,162 6 12.5 1,162 7 12.5 1,162 8 12.5 1,162 9 12.5 1,162 10 12.5 1,162 Total 24 12.5 13,850
Community Loss of Eligibility Notices: Transition/Phase-Out Costs
Upon publication of this final rule,
Community Status Report: Cost Savings
FOOTNOTE 12 The Community Status Book is available for public viewing at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status-book. END FOOTNOTE
FOOTNOTE 13 Hourly rates derived from
Table 2-Net Cost Savings Year Internet Community status report cost Net cost NPV at 3% NPV at 7% publication cost savings savings 1$ 3,392 -$ 4,800 -$ 1,408 -$ 1,367 -$ 1,315 2 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 3,429 - 3,178 3 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 3,329 - 2,970 4 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 3,232 - 2,775 5 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 3,138 - 2,594 6 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 3,047 - 2,424 7 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 2,958 - 2,266 8 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 2,872 - 2,117 9 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 2,788 - 1,979 10 1,162 - 4,800 - 3,638 - 2,707 - 1,849 Total 13,850 - 48,000 - 34,150 - 28,868 - 23,468 Annualized - 3,384 - 3,341
The net cost savings expected from this rulemaking are presented in Table 2. The up-front transition costs are only expected to take place in Year 1, thus the cost savings expected over the subsequent years are not impacted. For the 10-year period analyzed, the estimated quantified discounted total cost savings at 7 and 3 percent are
4. Benefits
Revising 59.24 to eliminate the
In addition, making this change to 59.24, and updating
5. Transfers
Transfer payments are monetary payments from one group to another that do not affect total resources available to society. There are no anticipated transfer payments resulting from this final rule.
6. Alternatives Considered
7. Summary
Table 3 provides the A-4 accounting summary.
Table 3-A-4 Accounting Statement Category 7 Percent discount rate 3 Percent discount rate Source citation (RIA, preamble, etc.) Benefits Annualized Monetized$ 0 $ 0 Annualized Quantified N/A N/A Qualitative -- AllowsFEMA to be more agile and timely in updating community status information RIA -- Improve the ease and efficiency of locating community status and eligibility information Costs Annualized Monetized -$ 3,341 -$ 3,384 RIA Annualized quantified N/A N/A Qualitative N/A Transfers Annualized Monetized $ millions/year N/A N/A From/To N/A Effects State, Local, and/or Tribal Government None Small business None Wages None Growth None
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities. The term "small entities" comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. This rule does not directly impact any small entities. This rule only changes how
FOOTNOTE 14
FOOTNOTE 15 The number of NFIP communities is derived from "The National Flood Insurance Program Community Status Book," Page 478, located at https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/community-status-book. END FOOTNOTE
1. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 658, 1501-1504, 1531-1536, 1571, pertains to any rulemaking which is likely to result in the promulgation of any rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
2. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the agency obtains approval from the
FOOTNOTE 16 See 44 CFR 59.22 for a description of the information collected. END FOOTNOTE
3. Privacy Act/E-Government Act
Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, an agency must determine whether implementation of a proposed regulation will result in a system of records. A "record" is any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his/her education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his/her name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph. See 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(4). A "system of records" is a group of records under the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. See id. section 552a(a)(5). An agency cannot disclose any record which is contained in a system of records except by following specific procedures.
The E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3501 note also requires specific procedures when an agency takes action to develop or procure information technology that collects, maintains, or disseminates information that is in an identifiable form. This Act also applies when an agency initiates a new collection of information that will be collected, maintained, or disseminated using information technology if it includes any information in an identifiable form permitting the physical or online contacting of a specific individual.
In accordance with DHS policy,
4. Executive Order 13175, "Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments"
Executive Order 13175, "Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments," 65 FR 67249, (
Nor, to the extent practicable by law, may an agency promulgate a regulation that has Tribal implications and preempts Tribal law, unless the agency consults with Tribal officials. Although Tribes that meet the NFIP eligibility criteria can participate in the NFIP in the same manner as communities, /17/
FOOTNOTE 17 Although the NFIP does not explicitly reference Tribal Governments,
5. Executive Order 13132, "Federalism"
Executive Order 13132, "Federalism," 64 FR 43255 (
6. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 83 Stat. 852 (
Rulemaking is a major Federal action subject to NEPA. Categorical exclusions A3 included in the list of exclusion categories at
7. Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking
Under the Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801-808, before a rule can take effect, the Federal agency promulgating the rule must submit to
List of Subjects
44 CFR Parts 59
Flood insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
44 CFR Part 64
Flood insurance, Floodplains, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
PART 59--GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 59 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 43 FR 41943, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127 of
2. Amend
a. Revising the fourth sentence of paragraph (a);
b. Revising the fourth sentence of paragraph (c);
c. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (d);
d. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
(a) * * * If, subsequently, copies of adequate flood plain management regulations are not received by the Administrator, no later than 30 days before the expiration of the original six month period the Federal Insurance Administrator shall provide written notice to the community and to the state and assure publication of the community's loss of eligibility for the sale of flood insurance on the internet or by another comparable method, such suspension to become effective upon the expiration of the six month period. * * *
*****
(c) * * * If a community is to be suspended, the Federal Insurance Administrator shall inform it upon 30 days prior written notice and upon publication of its loss of eligibility for the sale of flood insurance on the internet or by another comparable method. * * *
(d) * * * If a community is to be suspended, the Federal Insurance Administrator shall inform it upon 30 days prior written notice and upon publication of its loss of eligibly for the sale of flood insurance on the internet or by another comparable method. * * *
(e) * * * Upon receipt of a certified copy of a final legislative action, the Federal Insurance Administrator shall withdraw the community from the Program and publish its loss of eligibility for the sale of flood insurance on the internet or by another comparable method. * * *
*****
PART 64--COMMUNITIES ELIGIBLE FOR THE SALE OF INSURANCE
3. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
4. Revise
Administrator,
[FR Doc. 2020-23970 Filed 10-29-20;
BILLING CODE 9111-52-P



Early Votes Spike Hints Of Record Turnout In Texas
America's Health Insurance Plans: Public Disclosure of Privately Negotiated Rates Will Lead to Less Affordable Health Care for Americans
Advisor News
- Finseca and IAQFP announce merger
- More than half of recent retirees regret how they saved
- Tech group seeks additional context addressing AI risks in CSF 2.0 draft profile connecting frameworks
- How to discuss higher deductibles without losing client trust
- Take advantage of the exploding $800B IRA rollover market
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Somerset Re Appoints New Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer as Firm Builds on Record-Setting Year
- Indexing the industry for IULs and annuities
- United Heritage Life Insurance Company goes live on Equisoft’s cloud-based policy administration system
- Court fines Cutter Financial $100,000, requires client notice of guilty verdict
- KBRA Releases Research – Private Credit: From Acquisitions to Partnerships—Asset Managers’ Growing Role With Life/Annuity Insurers
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- When health insurance costs more than the mortgage
- As ACA subsidies expire, thousands drop coverage or downgrade plans
- Findings from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Provides New Data about Managed Care (Association Between Health Plan Design and the Demand for Naloxone: Evidence From a Natural Experiment in New York): Managed Care
- Medicare is experimenting with having AI review claims – a cost-saving measure that could risk denying needed care
- CMS proposed rule impacts MA marketing and enrollment
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News