Rep. Maloney: Committee Releases Report on Insurer, PBM Compliance with Affordable Care Act Birth Control Coverage Requirement
Rep.
On
The Committee's investigation identified more than 30 birth control products for which most health insurers and PBMs reviewed impose cost-sharing requirements or coverage exclusions. The investigation found that the processes established for patients seeking exceptions to cost-sharing and coverage restrictions can be burdensome for patients and providers, and that from 2015 to 2021, companies denied exceptions requests on average four or more times out of ten. These practices raise barriers to accessing birth control, contrary to
Chairwoman Maloney issued the following statement in releasing the new findings:
"In the wake of the extreme
"Today, my Committee is releasing a new report revealing that health insurers and PBMs are imposing financial burdens on patients for dozens of birth control products, and that patients who seek exceptions to these restrictions face a bureaucratic process that often pushes care out of reach.
"Today's findings are a call to action.
This staff analysis, the first congressional report of contraceptive coverage in the private health insurance market, presents the findings of the Committee's investigation:
* Health Plans and PBMs Have Coverage Exclusions or Cost-Sharing Requirements for at Least 34 Different Contraceptive Products. The Committee identified 34 contraceptive products for which the majority of companies reported coverage exclusions or cost-sharing on at least one plan or formulary. Of these products, 12 have no equivalent product on the market. Half of the 34 products--six of which have no equivalent product on the market--are subject to exclusions or cost-sharing requirements by each of the companies surveyed. The companies reported cost-sharing obligations of up to
* Insurers and PBMs Disproportionately Impose Cost-Sharing or Coverage Exclusions for Newer Contraceptive Products. New products may reflect recent innovations and provide alternatives to traditional contraception. However, for approximately 50% the of contraceptive products examined by the Committee that were approved by the FDA after 2011, a majority of the companies imposed coverage exclusions or required cost-sharing.
* Many Contraceptive Products Used by Patients with Distinct Health Care Needs or Disproportionately Used by People with Lower Incomes are Subject to Cost-Sharing or Exclusions. At least five of the 17 products for which all companies require cost-sharing or have coverage exclusions provide particular clinical benefit to patients with distinct health care needs. Four of the 17 products are non-pill products, which are disproportionately used by patients with less income and non-white patients.
* Health Insurers and PBMs Deny an Average of at Least 40% of Exception Requests. The majority of companies surveyed reported denying an average of at least 40% of exception requests from individuals seeking coverage for contraceptive products from 2015 to 2021. One company denied more than 80% of requests each year.
* Exceptions Processes Are Inadequate. The Committee obtained documents showing the companies' processes for considering exceptions to cost-sharing or coverage exclusions are not sufficiently accessible, expedient, or transparent to be considered "reasonable" medical management under ACA guidance. One company reported a delay of up to 15 days to process exception requests, and two companies request that providers document prior medications a patient has unsuccessfully tried in order for that patient to receive an exception.
To address coverage gaps and better ensure that all people have access to the most appropriate contraceptive products without out-of-pocket payment obligations, the staff report recommends that the
* * *
* * *
Original text here: https://oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/committee-releases-report-on-insurer-and-pbm-compliance-with-affordable-care-act


Former North Carolina CFO sentenced to 41 months in prison for $2M fraud
Six Philadelphia-area people charged with over $1M in COVID fraud
Advisor News
- Succession planning: Building the future of your practice
- From loss to security: Supporting widowed clients with life insurance
- Plan now for lower Social Security benefits later
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- Why advisors should offer retirement-longevity planning
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
- Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Benchmark International Successfully Facilitated the Transaction Between National Group Marketing Trust and New Era Life Insurance Companies
- Why the bond market is flexing its muscles, and why everyone needs to care
- An Application for the Trademark “LIVE TODAY, SECURE TOMORROW.” Has Been Filed by Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York: Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
- Modern Woodmen board selects Shea Doyle as next president and CEO
- New Influenza Study Results from University of Auckland Described (Risk Management In Deadly Times: the Us Life Insurance Industry In the 1918-9 Influenza Pandemic): Influenza
More Life Insurance News