Reminder To Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. Shareholders – Special General Meeting Of Shareholders Is Next Week
For the reasons set out in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus (as defined below) filed with the
The proposed changes to the existing Third Point Re bye-laws are an important component of the proposed transaction that, if approved, would provide the Company and its shareholders with a new set of bye-laws that Third Point Re's Board of Directors believes are appropriate for this stage of the Company's evolution into a top-tier global specialty insurer and reinsurer. Specifically, the Board of Directors recommends in favor of each of the bye-law proposals for the following reasons:
- Proposal 3 (First bye-laws proposal):
The first bye-laws proposal clarifies the procedures by which shareholders may submit shareholder proposals and director nominations. These provisions provide shareholders with greater detail on the information that must be submitted to the Company with the proposal and provide the shareholders with time that the Third Point Re Board of Directors believes is adequate (and in the case of director nominations, more time than the existing bye-laws) to make such proposals and nominations, in line with other public companies and market practice.
Benefits to Shareholders. The Third Point Re Board of Directors believes these revised provisions benefit shareholders by making the timing and procedures for shareholder proposals and director nominations clearer and therefore providing an easier roadmap to follow in the event they wish to submit such proposals or nominations.
- Proposal 4 (Second bye-laws proposal):
The second bye-laws proposal deletes provisions related to director appointment rights of historical investors and provisions related to the removal of directors that are no longer operative.
Benefits to Shareholders. The Third Point Re Board of Directors believes this proposal is beneficial for shareholders because it removes historical provisions giving additional rights to specific investors that are no longer operative; no substantive change to the bye-laws is being made.
- Proposal 5 (Third bye-laws proposal):
The third bye-laws proposal amends or adds provisions to provide that a director with a conflict of interest must declare that interest, but that the director is not required to recuse himself or herself from the vote. The Third Point Re Board of Directors believes that this approach is a more typical approach for a
Bermuda public company, providing the members of the Third Point Re Board of Directors with greater discretion to determine when it is appropriate for a director to recuse himself or herself from a particular matter.Benefits to Shareholders. This proposal is intended to benefit shareholders by ensuring that the Third Point Re Board of Directors considers matters and makes decisions with knowledge of any conflicts, but allows the directors, elected by the shareholders and acting in the interests of shareholders, to continue to bring to bear their knowledge, expertise and experience to the matter being considered.
- Proposal 6 (Fourth bye-laws proposal):
The fourth bye-laws proposal removes the requirement that certain historical investors consent to amendments to the bye-laws that have a material adverse effect on that investor. If approved, these consent rights with respect to Daniel S. Loeb will be contained in an investor rights agreement to be entered into between Third Point Re and
Mr. Loeb in connection with the closing of the merger.Benefits to Shareholders: This proposal is intended to benefit shareholders by making it clear that certain historical investors no longer have these consent rights, while continuing to provide
Mr. Loeb , a significant shareholder of Third Point Re, with rights commensurate with his ownership and historical rights. - Proposal 7 (Fifth bye-laws proposal):
The fifth bye-laws proposal removes certain historical investors' consent rights over special actions of Third Point Re, their board observer rights and their consent right over amendments to the memorandum of association that have a material adverse effect on that investor. If approved, these consent and other rights with respect to Daniel S. Loeb will be contained in an investor rights agreement to be entered into between Third Point Re and
Mr. Loeb in connection with the closing of the merger.Benefits to Shareholders. These changes to the bye-laws are intended to be beneficial to shareholders by making clear that certain historical investors no longer have these rights, while continuing to provide
Mr. Loeb , a significant shareholder of Third Point Re, with rights commensurate with his ownership and historical rights. - Proposal 8 (Sixth bye-laws proposal):
The sixth bye-laws proposal makes other changes to the bye-laws not described above, including changes agreed as part of the merger agreement to effectuate the voting cutback of CM Bermuda. Failure to approve this proposal would result in the voting cutback of CM Bermuda being contained in a contractual agreement with Third Point Re. In addition, this proposal expands the maximum number of directors that are permitted on the Third Point Re Board of Directors by two.
Benefits to Shareholders. This proposal is intended to benefit shareholders by providing them with greater relative voting rights since the single largest shareholder will have its voting power cutback to 9.9% and ensuring that the voting cutback agreement cannot be amended without a shareholder vote. The expansion of the maximum number of directors permitted on the Third Point Re Board of Directors will allow Third Point Re to add additional directors with relevant expertise in key areas as it grows the combined company. Other changes to the bye-laws reflected in this proposal benefit shareholders by providing the Third Point Re Board of Directors with greater flexibility to operate the business in a manner it believes will provide the greatest value to shareholders and removing provisions that are no longer operative.
The Board of Directors of Third Point Re reiterates its recommendation that Third Point Re shareholders vote "FOR" the share issuance proposal, "FOR" the Loeb share issuance proposal, "FOR" each of the bye-laws proposals and "FOR" the name change proposal at a special general meeting of shareholders.
Third Point Re encourages shareholders to read the registration statement on Form S-4 dated
About the Company
Third Point Re is a public company listed on the
Contact
[email protected]
+1 441-542-3333
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information set forth in this communication, including financial estimates and statements as to the expected timing, completion and effects of the proposed transaction with
WHERE TO FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. This communication may be deemed to be solicitation material in respect of the proposed transaction with
PARTICIPANTS IN THE SOLICITATION
Third Point Re and its directors and executive officers, and
View original content:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reminder-to-third-point-reinsurance-ltd-shareholders--special-general-meeting-of-shareholders-is-next-week-301173510.html
SOURCE



HUB International Acquires The Assets Of Washington-Based The Vitolo Company
Advisor News
- House panel votes to raise certain taxes, transfer money to offset Medicaid shortfall
- Iowa House backs temporary tax hike to fill Medicaid gap
- Iowa Medicaid temporary tax plan draws sharp public opposition
- Charitable giving planning can strengthen advisor/client relationships
- New $6K deduction could provide tax planning window for retirees
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- We can help find a loved one’s life insurance policy
- 2025: A record-breaking year for annuity sales via banks and BDs
- Lincoln Financial launches two new FIAs
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company trademark request filed
- The forces shaping life and annuities in 2026
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- CT leaders debate how to fix health care: Blunt federal cuts, up reimbursement or kill private health care?
- When health insurance costs $2,500 per month, families make tough choices
- In U.S. Health Insurance Market, Consolidation Of Insurers Is Increasing Premiums
- Health insurance jargon can be frustrating and confusing – here's how to navigate it
- Minnesota Blue Cross CEO steps down from Sutter Health board over conflict of interest
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Murray Giles Hulse
- New individual life premium hits record-setting $17.5B in 2025
- Maryland orders Cigna to halt underpaying doctors or give cause
- Insurers optimistic about their investments in 2026
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of PVI Insurance Corporation
More Life Insurance News