Obamacare offer we should have refused
My doctor speculated that one day the mob would take over the health care business. Illegal drugs, prostitution, gambling rings, and the like only appeal to a small part of the population, but everyone needs to go to the doctor.
I think he was joking at the time after all, the mob has nothing on the cronies who've already taken over health care.
Although Obamacare was sold as the solution to all of America's health care woes, the outcomes almost 15 years later have been awful. Premiums have become more expensive as health insurance has become a bank-breaking necessity. Benefits have rapidly dwindled, the costs of treatment have increased, options have become more constrained, and the doctor-patient relationship has been indelibly sullied by the billing codes and arcane databases. Obamacare has been proven as the legislative snake oil of the 21st Century.
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say outcomes have been awful for us - the patient. Health insurance companies have raked in record profits under the "Affordable" Care Act.
Much like everything else in our gloomy, globalized era, the fundamental problem has been mass consolidation. The free-market economy doesn't work when it's unfree from monopolies, and there's no greater monopoly than the federal government. When it picks winners - even under the oh-so altruistic banner of healthcare for all! - we all lose.
And under Obamacare, the biggest winner has been the
Apparently when Obama said "at a certain point, you've made enough money," he was not counting corporate insurance beneficiaries of his signature legislation.
Now perhaps that last one is not completely fair. After all,
The MLR requires companies to spend 80 to 85 percent of premium revenue on actual health care "so executives wouldn't be able to pad their wallets as much." However, as is often the case with government mandates, insurers like UnitedHealth just maneuvered around the letter of the MLR rather than following the spirit of it. See, insurance companies tend to have diversified business interests - including pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), physician-owned practices, payday loans, and so on.
So while the MLR capped profits for claims reimbursement at the point of service, differently designated treatments serve as a loophole, so insurance companies can get away with much less than that lofty 80 to 85 percent. In a Freakonomics-style "people respond very strongly to incentives," the MLR instead created the financial imperative for insurance companies to become even more powerful rather than less.
UnitedHealth has taken point on consolidating the PBM industry when it acquired
See PBMs exist (ostensibly) to serve as a negotiator between pharmaceutical and insurance companies. In theory, that's a great idea - but not if one of those two parties owns the PBM. It's like if the mob owns a law firm. The three biggest PBMs are each owned by a large insurer: Caremark is owned by CVS/
Insurance companies use their PBMs to drive up prescription drug prices for patients. A
Insurance companies and their PBMs have gamed the system and their profits are up tens of billions. Patients are paying more for prescription drugs.
And community pharmacies are closing at record rates.
The deck feels stacked against ordinary Americans. That causes America's widespread loss of faith in institutions. Maybe it's because these institutions have become too big for anyone's good but the few dons at the top. The federal government should not be picking winners and losers, it certainly shouldn't be creating monopolies who are incentivized to drive up drug prices for patients.
All of which leaves people like me wishing that health care industry would just be taken over by the mob.
At least when they shake someone down, they're honest about it.


Need for Storm Preparation Is One of Hurricane Ian's Legacies
Need for Storm Preparation Is One of Hurricane Ian’s Legacies
Advisor News
- From loss to security: Supporting widowed clients with life insurance
- Plan now for lower Social Security benefits later
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
- Why advisors should offer retirement-longevity planning
- A hybrid approach outperforms the 4% Rule, researchers find
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
- Industry pushes back on linking ‘financial strength’ to annuity illustrations
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Life Insurance Awareness Month: Time to Reassess Your Coverage
- U-Haul Holding Company Announces Twentieth Annual Virtual Analyst and Investor Meeting
- Securian Financial Increases Individual Life Retention to $10 Million, Strengthening Support for High-Net-Worth Life Insurance Market
- Americans without children are less confident about retirement, Allianz finds
- The conversation almost no advisor is having yet
More Life Insurance News