New law enrolls every NY driver in pricier auto insurance coverage. Half will get no benefit [The Buffalo News, N.Y.]
Aug. 10—ALBANY — Because of a new state law, every driver in
That includes millions of unmarried motorists who would derive no benefit from the extra coverage, which allows an individual to sue their spouse for damages stemming from negligent driving.
The new law does not differentiate between unmarried and married New Yorkers.
In memos last year, insurance companies warned Gov.
New Yorkers may opt out of the added coverage, which, according to the state
But opting out requires the consumer to be aware of the new law, contact their insurance company and sign a form declining the coverage.
Already, New Yorkers had among the highest auto insurance bills in the country. The new law was pushed through by groups representing state trial lawyers, who are among the most powerful interests in
Before the bill passed the
The law took effect on
Still, insurance companies worry that consumers may not notice, and that insurers will be blamed when customers do eventually notice higher premiums.
The chairman of the
"While I do feel that it is incumbent upon an insurance company and their agents and brokers to ensure that potential insureds have the best and most appropriate coverage to meet their needs, I certainly don't want people unknowingly paying for coverage that would provide them no benefit," Breslin said. "I would certainly be willing to discuss potential amendments to make the law more explicit in its application if necessary."
What's covered
The new law requires state insurance companies to enroll customers in "supplemental spousal liability insurance."
When a driver is at fault for a car accident in
But if the spouse of the negligent driver is injured, the injured spouse generally cannot sue their husband or wife, then recover money from their spouse's insurance policy.
The exception: If the driver had the "supplemental spousal liability insurance." In that instance, the injured spouse may sue their significant other, who was driving, and seek insurance payment from the driver's insurer for non-economic damages, including pain and suffering.
Under prior state law, insurance companies had been required to offer the supplemental coverage to policyholders. But the policyholder had to proactively opt-in to get the coverage.
In a memorandum last year, Geico urged Hochul to veto the bill. According to company data, less than half of its auto insurance customers in
"Even someone who wouldn't qualify for this coverage because they are not married would be forced to carry it (and possibly pay more for it) if they did not take extra steps to reject this coverage — something they never had to do before," Connor wrote. "This means that more than half of
The bill was also strongly opposed by the industry's umbrella group, the
"Pervasive confusion will be created for those insureds who discover they were 'forced' into purchasing this coverage," Creedon wrote in
A Hochul spokesman,
In the Democratic-controlled
The bill passed the Assembly by a margin of 110-39, and more easily in the
Lawyers' lobbying
Two industry groups, the state
In a memo to Hochul last year,
"Unfortunately, while supplemental spousal coverage is available, many people are unaware of it, don't purchase it, and only find out that their spouse is uninsured when something awful happens," Hacker wrote.
The trial lawyer groups did not respond to questions about how frequently such a scenario had occurred in the past.
In 2022, the year the supplemental insurance bill was passed, LAWPAC gave the maximum
In
Even without buying the supplemental insurance, spouses of negligent drivers do enjoy some protection from auto accidents. Regardless of who's at fault for an accident, insurance plans in
But such minimum "no fault" insurance does not cover lawsuits alleging that a negligent driver has caused non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering.
In the past, trial lawyers groups also have favored other
Hochul has not always agreed with the trial lawyers lobby, including her veto last January of the "Grieving Families Act," a bill that allowed lawsuits to be filed for "emotional damages" caused by negligence. That bill was strongly opposed by a hospital industry lobbying group, which itself had donated
___
(c)2023 The Buffalo News (Buffalo, N.Y.)
Visit The Buffalo News (Buffalo, N.Y.) at www.buffalonews.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Kokua Line: Tips for emergency alerts, fire insurance claims [The Honolulu Star-Advertiser]
AM Best Removes From Under Review With Negative Implications and Affirms Credit Ratings of Ghana Reinsurance PLC
Advisor News
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A client remarried: Does their annuity still fit?
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News