N.C. Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network, Legal Aid of North Carolina's Disaster Relief Project Issue Public Comment on FEMA Notice

WASHINGTON, Aug. 1 -- Andrew Loeb Shoenig, facilitator at North Carolina Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network, Cary, and Lesley Albritton, managing attorney at the Legal Aid of North Carolina's Disaster Relief Project, Raleigh, have issued a public comment on the Federal Emergency Management Agency notice entitled "Request for Information on FEMA Programs, Regulations, and Policies". The comment was written on July 21, 2021, and posted on July 22, 2021:

* * *

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on FEMA's programs and policies. The North Carolina Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network's Advocacy Team/1 (NCIDR) and Legal Aid of North Carolina's Disaster Relief Project (LANC) compiled the attached comments and recommendations based on our members' first-hand experience working in communities during disaster recovery efforts.

Founded in 2016 following Hurricane Matthew, the North Carolina Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network (NCIDR) is a statewide collaborative of public, private, non-profit, and faith organizations. NCIDR convenes, facilitates, and communicates a united, inclusive vision for North Carolina communities of well-managed disaster recovery grounded in strong community reinvestment strategies, asset-based community development, and equitable opportunity. We meet monthly to raise issues, share resources, and address policy concerns.

Legal Aid of North Carolina's Disaster Relief Project (LANC) provides legal assistance and education to survivors of natural disasters in North Carolina. The project also supports community economic development and long-term recovery in disaster-impacted communities. LANC has been engaged in the NC Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network since the network'.

We appreciate FEMA's interest in removing barriers in the agency's programs, policies, and practices that hinder resilience in communities disproportionately impacted by climate hazards. We would be happy to elaborate further on any of the comments provided below.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely yours,

Andrew Loeb Shoenig, Facilitator, NC Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network, [email protected], https://bit.ly/ncidr,

919-766-6519

Lesley Albritton, Managing Attorney, Disaster Relief Project, Legal Aid of NC, Inc., [email protected], https://www.legalaidnc.org/,

252-758-0113

* * *

1. Are there FEMA programs, regulations, and/or policies that perpetuate systemic barriers to opportunities and benefits for people of color and/or other underserved groups as defined in Executive Order 13985 and, if so, what are they? How can those programs, regulations, and/or policies be modified, expanded, streamlined, or repealed to deliver resources and benefits more equitably?

a. The Conservation Fund's Resourceful Communities Program, a member of the NC Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network, administered both public and philanthropic COVID-19 emergency relief funding. They found that predominantly large, White-led organizations with substantial budgets and administrative infrastructure prior to the pandemic benefited from emergency funding programs, whereas organizations that were systematically excluded (because of race, history, capacity, lack of access, lack of funding, etc.) prior to the pandemic struggled to access pandemic funding resources despite similar relief efforts. These trends hold for federal disaster aid to individuals, as reported in The New York Times./2

This highlights the overarching need for FEMA and disaster recovery funding at all levels of government to incorporate voices often excluded from conversations to better understand and remove barriers that prevent funding from reaching systemically under resourced communities.

b. We are concerned about disparities in assistance to African American churches compared to White churches under the recent expansion of FEMA Public Assistance to Houses of Worship. A predominantly White church in New Bern, NC, received $6.13 million from FEMA's Public Assistance. In contrast, many African American churches in Eastern North Carolina that sustained damage in 2018 from Hurricane Florence will not be receiving assistance and remain closed despite multiple requests for technical and financial assistance. At least three of these African American churches are currently up for sale - a permanent loss to the community infrastructure. African American churches faced disproportionate regulatory, technical, and technological challenges in accessing Public Assistance. For example, internet access in African American neighborhoods of Craven County was not restored for six months; required documentation was lost due to flood waters; and church leaders were dealing with their personal losses while also caring for their congregations and congregants. Technical assistance prior to storms is needed to ensure these churches are set up to at least navigate the dense eligibility requirements. At the same time, FEMA must incorporate African American voices to better understand the systemic barriers communities face when trying to access funding so that policies are more inclusive. For example, reimbursement-based programs put undue cash burdens on disaster-stressed congregations, and complex regulations favor institutions that can afford to hire professional consultants.

NCIDR recommends FEMA mitigation funding include funds and programs that provide "blue sky" technical assistance to individuals, grassroots community organizations, and houses of worship that face barriers to eligibility, due to lack of incorporation, lack of proper financial documentation, and clouded titles. This will help these entities in clearing eligibility barriers before the next storm hits. Smaller grassroots groups would benefit from help in building finances, establishing formal memoranda of understanding with local municipalities (there is often an expectation that they provide relief and reach residents not served by mainstream resources, and yet no resources or reimbursements are provided), and documenting their emergency response expenses so that they can equitably access FEMA funding.

c. All disasters "start local and end local," and funding priorities should reflect this truism. Funding should prioritize small, community-based organizations that contribute to long-term resilience, as opposed to outside contractors who are transient and unfamiliar with the local context. During Hurricanes Matthew and Florence, FEMA contracted Endeavors for disaster case management, but Endeavors departed the community as soon as their contract ended after 18 months.

The departure of outside case management contractors leaves long-term recovery groups to continue the work on a largely volunteer basis. We recommend that FEMA consider funding alternatives for continuity of operations for long term recovery, preparedness, and mitigation projects. Long-term recovery groups often struggle to keep their staff and end up going dormant. Increased funding could help alleviate this problem and ensure long-term recovery groups are a source of year-round community resilience.

NCIDR members' experience is that few organizations are made aware of the contracting process for individual assistance. Our mainstream organizational partners at NC Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster report that the bidding process does not seem to be open to everyone. Rather bidding occurs among a few organizations that have previously worked with the state. We recommend releasing information about the contracting for the individual assistance program in a transparent and more equitable way. This might look like intentional outreach to organizations to learn about the process and support them to access the funds if they have the capacity to do it. Intentionally reach out to organizations that provide services to marginalized communities that adapt their missions to provide disaster services (like the Episcopal Farmworker Ministry) to be part of the bidding and potentially access these funds for disaster case management.

d. We recommend prioritizing hiring and contracting with people and businesses within or adjacent to disaster impacted areas. This targeted investment in the region would allow for quicker community recovery efforts. While disasters by definition overwhelm local response capacity, partnering with nearby businesses and individuals will help bolster long-term recovery by targeting funding within impacted communities. For example, local farmers with working equipment could be contracted to clear the roads and ditches in front of their houses and farms. Yet following Hurricane Florence, NCIDR members reported trucks and equipment brought in from Pennsylvania passed by local farmers desperate for the business that clearing their own local roads could have generated.

e. Non-citizen North Carolinians perceive or experience barriers to accessing FEMA programs based on documentation status. Despite paying taxes as a condition of their work permits, these residents are not eligible for FEMA benefits. It would be beneficial to create and promote programs available for people who are not citizens but pay taxes though work permits or ITIN numbers. Recovery for these residents is critical to the recovery of the broader community, especially the food system.

f. We are concerned about a lack of programs available to renters. FEMA provides assistance for hotel stays, but there are not many programs that provide rental assistance, security deposits, and application fees for survivors that have to relocate. Unfortunately, many landlords refuse to repair their properties after a storm. Undocumented residents in particular are often neglected. Thus, survivors have no option but to stay in unsanitary, unsafe houses due to factors such as the housing crisis, lack of resources to relocate, and lack of documentation to rent another property. NCIDR members recommend FEMA provide alternative service for renters and work with landlords to ensure repairs and reconstruction take place. Hotel stays are not sustainable solutions for many people, accounting for transportation, documentation, and language barriers, among others. Providing flexible funding for renters to replace appliances, furniture, clothing, and other necessary goods would be more beneficial.

g. We recommend that FEMA clearly communicate about programs available, regardless of immigration status, social security number, or state-issued ID. Some individuals may have the requisite documentation but not seek services for fear of misunderstandings with local law enforcement that harm themselves or family members. Moreover, creating a welcoming environment at service sites is imperative. The placement of law enforcement officers dissuades people of color, especially in the Latino community, from accessing public services. Though this decision is made by local government leaders, FEMA can ensure its programs are more efficiently and equitably implemented by requiring local governments to use alternatives for crowd control such a local volunteers, social services, or unmarked and plain clothes officers.

h. Ensuring cultural competency in FEMA employees and contractors is essential to establish trust and to encourage communities to seek support. In line with evidence from research on representative bureaucracy, NCIDR recommends all public agencies invest in hiring multilingual and multicultural leadership, in addition to making translation and interpretation services part of every budget. Language access and cultural competency are crucial throughout the services offered by an agency and should not be siloed, but rather integrated with each step of service provision. At physical locations, printed materials in multiple languages should be in clear view alongside their English counterparts, reaffirming a sense of respect and dignity. For example, a Legal Aid advocate called FEMA with a Spanish speaking client. The initial phone options are to choose 1 for English and 2 for Spanish. However, the person answering the line after choosing option 2 was not able to speak Spanish and asked if either the client or the advocate had someone to translate.

Moreover, representatives must be aware of social conflict, cultural norms, or religious holidays when delivering services. For example, FEMA representatives should know how to serve Muslim clients during Ramadan, ask clients questions about preferred names, and understand that clients may be defensive, sad or frustrated due to conflict in their home countries.

i. Finally, inequitable outreach for FEMA Individual Assistance has continued disproportionate effects in long-term recovery. For example, FEMA Individual Assistance registrations also determine whether US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recovery programs deem an area as "Most Impacted and Distressed," making the municipality eligible for a larger share of Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) allocations. These formulas also factor into how much money HUD awards the state overall.

2. Are there FEMA programs, regulations, and/or policies that do not bolster resilience to impacts of climate change, particularly for those disproportionately impacted by climate change, and, if so, what are they? How can those programs, regulations, and/or policies be modified, expanded, streamlined, or repealed to bolster resilience to the impacts of climate change?

a. No specific comment is provided for this question.

3. Are there FEMA programs, regulations, and/or policies that do not promote environmental justice? How can those programs, regulations, and/or policies be modified, expanded, streamlined, or repealed to promote environmental justice?

a. No specific comment is provided for this question.

4. Are there FEMA programs, regulations, and/or policies that are unnecessarily complicated or could be streamlined to achieve the objectives of equity for all (including people of color and others who have been historically underserved, marginalized, and adversely affected by persistent poverty and inequality), bolstering resilience to climate change, or addressing the disproportionately high and adverse climate-related impacts on disadvantaged communities in more efficient ways? If so, what are they and how can they be made less complicated and/or streamlined?

a. Paradoxically, NCIDR members suggest that the initial application for FEMA Individual Assistance is not comprehensive enough. The application does not effectively explain what documentation is needed, which leads to confusion and increased administrative burden later in the process. Survivors may not apply for funding because they perceive the process is a waste of time as they work to reestablish their life following a disaster. This disillusionment may result from an overall low approval rating of FEMA's Individual Assistance Program, which the Washington Post reports at just 13%./3

It may also be beneficial to track applicants who start the process, but do not finish to better understand barriers. For example, misinformation regarding potential legal consequences spreads widely, with NCIDR members reporting that residents of Craven County were discouraged to apply for benefits out of fear that applying for something you did not qualify for would result in prosecution.

b. FEMA's additional burdens for heir property are disproportionately burdensome in rural, eastern North Carolina, where Black residents are more likely than their White counterparts to have property transmitted using this legal instrument. There is no legal basis for requiring disaster survivors to provide incontrovertible proof of homeownership./4

This issue is a regular topic of conversation raised by legal aid and pro bono attorney projects at NCIDR meetings. NCIDR members expressed general confusion over how heir's property is treated in regards to flood insurance that follows property and not individuals. Legal Aid of North Carolina's Disaster Relief Project navigates this barrier with clients regularly and is willing to advise on possible remedies.

FEMA only provides benefits to "owner-occupied" properties, defined as a residence occupied by: (1) The legal owner; (2) A person who does not hold formal title to the residence and pays no rent, but is responsible for the payment of taxes or maintenance of the residence; (3) A person who has lifetime occupancy rights with formal title vested in another." 44 C.F.R. Sec. 206.111. Owners of heir property should be included in this definition under definition number 1 because heir property is a legal form of land ownership. However, FEMA seems to consider owners of heir property to fall under definition number 2. FEMA. This disfavors owners of heir property, many of whom are African-American, because many owners and occupiers of heir property may not pay property taxes because of their fractional ownership interest or may lack a tax document in their name. They may also lack the financial means to maintain the residence in conventional ways for which they can show receipts for work done, etc. FEMA adopt policies that acknowledge that heirship is a legal and legitimate way of holding property.

The primary way in which FEMA verifies ownership is "through inspection, automated public records search, or submitted documents, including documents from the state, territorial, or tribal government." FEMA, Individual Assistance Program and Policy Guide (IAPPG), p. 54 (March 2019). Owners of heir property by definition do not possess these documents. Heir property, particularly in southern Black communities, has grown out of a history of segregation and racial oppression that excluded African-American from transferring property through deeds and will because they lacked access to attorneys and to local court houses and because of a deep mistrust of a legal system that had been used to marginalize and abuse them. By defining acceptable ownership documentation as the above, FEMA ignores the historical context by which heirship arises in communities of color in the United States.

The only exception that FEMA provides its ownership requirements is for applicants located in insular areas, islands or on tribal lands. FEMA, IPPG at p. 56 (March 2019). FEMA's definition of "insular" currently encompasses only: "American Samoa, the Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, the Marshall Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the Virgin Islands." 42 U.S. Code Sec. 5204(1) From applicants in those areas, FEMA may accept a written statement attesting to ownership. 42 U.S. Code Sec. 5204(1). FEMA's definition of "insular" should be expanded to include communities that have been isolated from white, affluent society due to their racial composition and that have thus lacked access to means to prepare deeds and wills for transferring title. Alternatively, FEMA should accept written statements from everyone who lacks a deed or other title instrument in their name due to heir property and access to justice issues that plague lower income communities and communities of color. FEMA should also expand its list of acceptable alternative ownership documentation to include affidavits of ownership from the applicant's family members and certifications from licensed attorneys that they have conducted a thorough review of ownership and certifying that the applicant is an owner.

c. The Individual Assistance flood insurance requirements that follow property rather than people can be a burdensome expense for those on limited and fixed incomes. A Legal Aid client's home was destroyed by Hurricane Floyd in 2011. FEMA gave them individual homeowner assistance to rebuild their home, which they did. However, this assistance was provided with the condition that the homeowner maintain flood insurance on the property in perpetuity. FEMA subsidized the flood insurance for only three years. After that, the insurance company asked client to pay the entire premium up-front in one lump sum. The premium was between $3,000 to $7,000. Client is disabled, leaving them unable to work, and could not afford the insurance premiums on a fixed income, and certainly not in a lump sum.

Since then, client was impacted by both Hurricanes Matthew in 2016 and Florence in 2018. The flooding around their home has shifted the foundation, causing the floor joints to start bending inward. The structural integrity of the home is eroding. Client was denied FEMA for both subsequent storms and is ineligible for the CDBG-DR Homeowner Recovery program for failure to maintain flood insurance per FEMA requirements. Essentially, this flood insurance requirement serves as a "one and done" shot at recovery for the disabled and the elderly who have no way to increase their income, while being forced to take on a significant added expense for the rest of their lives to stay in their home.

Increasing the subsidy and lowering the price that individuals must pay to receive flood coverage will make it more likely that they can avoid being denied for FEMA assistance in a future flood disaster. FEMA should consider extending group flood insurance coverage to poor communities beyond 36 months.

d. NCIDR members call for an appeals process that is independent of the original decision maker. This new process could be modeled on the USDA Farm Service Agency National Appeals Division. The North Carolina Justice Center (https://www.ncjustice.org/ - Bill Rowe, General Counsel/Deputy Director of Advocacy) may be a resource for FEMA to better understand issues that arise with the current appeals process.

For example, an elderly, Black, Legal Aid client's home was significantly damaged by Hurricane Florence. Despite having a properly recorded deed in her name, she was denied by FEMA for assistance because "ownership could not be verified." She appealed this determination and, a month later, was denied because the deed did not include the address of the property. There is no requirement that a deed include the 911 address. On third and fourth appeal attempts she was denied after FEMA deemed her property "safe to occupy" despite the client submitting documentation of around $7k in damages.

5. Are there any FEMA regulations and/or policies that create duplication, overlap, complexity, or inconsistent requirements within FEMA programs, other DHS components, or any other Federal Government agency that impact equity, resilience to the effects of climate change, and/or environmental justice? If so, what are they and how can they be improved or updated to meet the required objectives of equity, resiliency, and environmental justice?

a. Under the Stafford Act, FEMA is prohibited from engaging in economic status discrimination. 42 U.S.C. 5151. FEMA should interpret this to mean that it must eliminate policies that harm individuals with lower economic status. This will promote equity more effectively than purporting to administer disaster assistance programs without regard to economic status.

Under the Stafford Act, there is some FEMA assistance that first requires an application to the SBA disaster loan, but some do not. This overlap is confusing and unnecessary, and FEMA should actively collaborate with SBA to remove barriers to assistance. Incorrect denials can be avoided; this is vital because survivors are not equipped to appeal, or do not know that it is possible to appeal (decision letters sometimes come with the language "This decision is final" even when appeal is still possible).

FEMA should re-train staff on the issue of SBA loans and improve its public-facing/outreach materials. For example FEMA should consider a clearer path or visualization to demonstrate the relationship between FEMA assistance and SBA assistance after a disaster. Consider this resource from SBP-USA: SBP-DisasterAssistance-Process-Overview.pdf (sbpusa.org).

In cases where an SBA application is required, the process has described in conversations convened by NCIDR as "kicking someone that is already down by putting them through a credit process they know they are not going to qualify for." Instead of automatically referring some FEMA applicants to SBA and requiring an SBA denial in order to receive some types of FEMA assistance, FEMA should conduct an SBA loan pre-screening. Many of FEMA's referrals to SBA are unnecessary because SBA will not provide a loan for those applicants. This process is inefficient because it causes an unnecessary delay in receiving disaster assistance. SBA has certain credit score and citizenship requirements; these qualifications should be determined by FEMA prior to an SBA referral. FEMA prequalification screenings will be more efficient for applicants and for the SBA./5

Due to the tedious nature of the FEMA referral/ SBA loan process, FEMA representatives receive more training and should be able to thoroughly explain to survivors what to expect at every step including SBA loan approval or denial. Anecdotally our clients get incorrect information that prevents them from submitting or completing their FEMA applications.

6. Does FEMA currently collect information, use forms, or require documentation that impede access to FEMA programs and/or are not effective to achieve statutory, regulatory, and/or program objectives? If so, what are they and how can FEMA revise them to reduce burden, save time or costs, increase simplification and navigability, reduce confusion or frustration, and increase equity in access to FEMA programs and achieving statutory and/or regulatory objectives?

a. Funding requirements that involve burdensome, often changing, financial documentation excludes less resourced organizations that do not have the paid staff and financial practices in place to produce the required level of documentation. We observe a similar pattern in Individual Assistance, where those with more time and resources have the capacity to navigate bureaucracy. They are, therefore, better able to access benefits. Clarity on priorities and selection criteria up front would save many groups precious resources, particularly if they are not a fit. Tracking geographic and demographic spread of disbursements would help identify excluded communities and provide data to re-prioritize practices that reinforce exclusion.

b. FEMA assistance often arrives in one lump sum, even when there are several sources or forms represented in the payment. Survivors should receive more guidance about what the funds are for, to avoid issues of Duplication of Benefits. In recouping assistance, FEMA should recognize the reality that lower income survivors face in managing scant resources after a disaster. FEMA should provide factors to assist its specialists in recognizing when it is against equity and good conscience and would defeat the purpose of FEMA assistance to demand repayment after the disaster.

c. Requirements/paperwork for continued rental assistance are unnecessarily complicated and burdensome, especially for survivors in poverty who may not be living in traditional housing or not under a traditional written lease. These arrangements make it difficult for them to acquire the documentation necessary to satisfy FEMA's current requirements but are nonetheless unable to return to their homes and are paying for other accommodations in some form or fashion. As a result, many clients receive the initial rental assistance payment but are cut off by FEMA even though they have not yet been able to move back home yet.

The amount of information FEMA requires, and length of the form, is burdensome in this case. The instructional introduction alone is over two pages long and contains overly complicated language. The instructions are difficult to follow and FEMA should edit and shorten for clarity. Another thing that could be cut from the application is frequency of the payment, which is duplicative if documentation is also required and would show this information. Again because of non-traditional or transitional arrangements common for poor disaster survivors, FEMA should remove the requirement of documentation itself. This additional documentation, which is an incredible burden for the survivor to obtain and provide, is unnecessary given that applicants are required to certify that all the information contained in the application is true and correct.

d. The process for requesting one's FEMA file is unnecessarily complicated and unclear. FEMA should provide transparency in requesting this data, especially for those who do not use the online portal system. Many survivors lose access to their documentation and will likely need copies of it in the future for applications to receive further assistance. In addition, FEMA files should be made readily available to disaster relief organizations and state agencies who require this information to dole out assistance years after a disaster hits. FEMA should develop a streamlined process and have a dedicated point of contact for file requests made in conjunction with the activities of partner disaster relief organizations and state agencies.

7. Are there FEMA regulations and/or policies that have been overtaken by technological developments? Can FEMA leverage new technologies to modify, streamline, or do away with existing regulatory and/or policy requirements? If so, what are they and how can FEMA use new technologies to achieve its statutory and regulatory objectives in light of the Executive orders cited?

a. We are concerned about FEMA's increased reliance on web-based technologies to get information out and applications in. Broadband availability is under 65% in most eastern North Carolina counties, and restoration of service that does exist after hurricane events has been reported as taking up to six months in some areas./6

Streamlining benefits and prioritizing coordination between agencies can help make the process easier for all involved.

b. As described in an earlier Legal Aid client story, the technology used by FEMA inspectors must be re-examined in light of incorrect findings of whether a home is habitable after a disaster, and hence incorrect denials of disaster repairs assistance.

8. Are there any FEMA regulations and/or policies that are duplicative, overlapping, or contain inconsistent requirements generally? Are there areas where FEMA's regulations create duplicative, overlapping, or difficult to navigate situations for individuals also navigating regulatory requirements of another Federal Government agency?

a. As discussed above, it is difficult to navigate between SBA and FEMA. Black disaster survivors face the extra hurdle of a loan application and scrutiny of their credit history which are unlikely to result in tangible assistance./7

Clients are being required to apply to SBA even though they will likely be denied before FEMA will consider, which constitutes a delay at best, functional barrier at worst.

b. NC Emergency Management did not receive timely guidance upon the expansion of the Public Assistance programs to Houses of Worship after Hurricane Florence in 2018. As a result, faith leaders in communities of color received either no information or incorrect information about how to access Public Assistance funds. A detailed assessment of unmet needs is requested to understand where and why this inconsistent communication occurred.

9. Are there existing sources of data that FEMA can use to evaluate the post-promulgation effects of regulations over time? Or, are there sources of data that FEMA can use to evaluate the effects of FEMA policies or regulations on equity for all, including individuals who belong to underserved communities?

a. We recommend increased transparency of funds distributed to infrastructure, service providers, and individuals disaggregated by race, ethnicity, income, and degree of rurality for greater accountability towards the agency's equity objectives. The current OpenFEMA system is not user-friendly for non-academic researchers or community advocates.

View attachment at: https://downloads.regulations.gov/FEMA-2021-0011-0275/attachment_1.pdf

* * *

Footnotes:

1/ A list of the members of the Advocacy Team of the NC Inclusive Disaster Recovery Network is included at the end of this document.

2/ https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/07/climate/FEMA-race-climate.html

3/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/fema-pressed-on-historically-high-rejection-rates-for-disaster-survivors/2021/06/23/40edf97c-d43a-11eb-ae54-515e2f63d37d_story.html

4/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/07/11/fema-black-owned-property/

5/ https://publicintegrity.org/environment/new-data-reveals-why-800000-applicants-were-denied-federal-disaster-assistance-loans/

6/ NC Broadband Availability Index.

https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/1ca29805a2454ffab6b9579702b99e59.

7/ https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=4957&context=nclr.

* * *

The notice can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov/document/FEMA-2021-0011-0001

TARGETED NEWS SERVICE (founded 2004) features non-partisan 'edited journalism' news briefs and information for news organizations, public policy groups and individuals; as well as 'gathered' public policy information, including news releases, reports, speeches. For more information contact MYRON STRUCK, editor, [email protected], Springfield, Virginia; 703/304-1897; https://targetednews.com