Medicare telehealth coverage is again under threat. Here’s how it affects elderly patients
Medicare may no longer cover telehealth services after
The loss of coverage could mean over 1.3 million Wisconsinites will no longer be able to use telehealth services for primary or specialty care — although behavioral health services will not be affected.
Medicare telehealth coverage has routinely been on the brink. It relies on short-term extensions through general congressional appropriations rather than its own legislation — an arrangement that hospital workers say threatens access to health care and makes their jobs harder.
"What (legislators) don't fully understand is how much work it is on the back end," said
Medicare, a federal health insurance program, mostly covers people 65 and older, and Easterday said the patients most affected by a loss in telehealth coverage would be elderly patients in rural communities.
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, Medicare only covered telehealth in rural communities — but even then, rural patients often lacked the internet service or technology to make virtual visits possible.
During the pandemic, the federal government expanded Medicare telehealth coverage and invested billions to develop broadband in rural areas.
For the past several years, telehealth services have been a key solution to the challenges of rural medicine, making it easier for rural patients to receive care wherever they live.
"It's hard to recruit in-person physicians in the rural climates," said
Schimmers, Heather.jpgSchimmers
In 2025, 23% of Gundersen's telehealth visits were with patients covered by Medicare. Many also are covered by Medicaid, a joint state-federal insurance program that does cover telehealth in
Rather than setting aside a full day for an appointment, patients might spend 20 minutes attending a virtual checkup. Similarly, children of elderly parents can attend a doctor visit they wouldn't have before.
"We need to make it as easy as possible for people to be seen," Schimmers said.
Despite their best efforts, telehealth coverage is under threat yet again.
Impact of coverage loss
The last time Medicare dropped coverage for telehealth services was late last year, when the government shutdown paused congressional appropriations altogether.
Before the shutdown, Gundersen saw over 700 Medicare patients per month through video visits. After Medicare coverage for this service dried up, that number dropped to 321 — a 56% decrease.
"We lose … our ability to take care of patients the way they want to be taken care of," Easterday said.
Schimmers heard from dozens of Gundersen patients who were forced to cancel their virtual visits. One patient traveled 120 miles round trip to attend a 20-minute checkup — a visit mandated by Medicare.
"They had to see their provider. They had to," Schimmers said. "We could have done that with telehealth … and avoided hours of burden on that patient."
Telehealth is also a useful tool for preventive or upstream care. Consistent, accessible checkups make it more likely that more serious problems are identified earlier.
"If we don't do it this way, guess what door they come in? The emergency room," Schimmers said. "(Telehealth) is the ideal patient path."
Schimmers and Easterday are "cautiously optimistic" that coverage won't shut off — but the uncertainty itself is damaging, they said.
'Incredibly disruptive'
Since the pandemic, Medicare telehealth coverage has been wrapped in short-term congressional appropriations.
It's been extended several times in recent years, and each time, providers have been uncertain about its future.
"It's incredibly disruptive to the health care system," Schimmers said. "Because we have to continually be reprioritizing and refocusing and trying to figure out, 'Are the patients scheduled a video visit?' 'Are they scheduled an in-person visit?' "
Medicare-specific legislation, independent of appropriations, would give providers some much-needed room to breathe.
In 2025,
The Connect for Health Act, introduced in the
"People are begging for health care systems to restructure, reformulate, figure out a different way to get this done, make this easier for people, make it easier for the provider, make it easier for the patient."
Although both bills enjoy bipartisan support, neither has passed in either chamber.



This was a multi-billion dollar disaster — and Trump is set to do it again
Far fewer people buy Obamacare coverage as insurance premiums spike
Advisor News
- Industry groups applaud House passage of Financial Exploitation Prevention Act
- Younger workers more likely to be eligible for a retirement plan after changing jobs
- Bank of America community event unpacks sales tax hike, small business struggles
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- IRI, ACLI express support for CLEAR Forms Act
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
- Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Maryland health insurers want to raise premiums an average 13.7% for individual plans in 2027
- Maryland health insurance rates could rise 13.7% in 2027 under proposal
- Millions drop Obamacare health coverage after subsidies expire and costs rise
- Improving how we deliver healthcare in Idaho
- Healthcare system needs a public option
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Misr Insurance Company
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- They Allegedly Enrolled People In Life Insurance Without Consent. Then Death Claims Paid Out
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Life Insurance News