Medicaid fraud fight between GOP and Edwards administration comes to head this week
Within days of taking office in 2016, Edwards ordered that the government-paid health insurance program raise its income-based eligibility requirements, which has allowed nearly a half million previously uninsured or underinsured people access to the government-paid health insurance program.
It's a potent issue likely to come to a head this week when the
Legislative Auditor
He asked the
But Revenue Secretary
Attorney General
But the issue goes beyond Landry's most recent opinion and Robinson has asked Landry for some clarifications. Another opinion issued about a year ago determined that tax information could not be used in an audit. It's not merely statistics but taking information from one entity, the
Robinson said this is an end-run around existing law to make a point about Medicaid expansion. "This is about politics," she said.
The image that bothers critics is of thousands of dastardly scofflaws ripping off hardworking patriots to exploit those sweet Medicaid benefits.
And while certainly a few providers have floated paper for work they didn't do and a handful of enrollees may have sold their prescription medicine, the big numbers that so enrage the base come from people making too much money to be enrolled in Medicaid. And that's an unintended consequence of Republican Gov.
Medicaid is insurance coverage for people who meet specific income criteria based on the size of the family --
A few years ago, the state-federal program paid doctors, hospitals and clinics directly for services provided. Now, the state pays private companies by head count to provide "managed care," which is supposed to give patients a more holistic treatment plan.
In the past, if Medicaid enrollees got a job or a promotion with earnings that exceeded specifications, perhaps even got coverage through their new employer, they'd just stop using Medicaid. No services, no additional tax dollars spent. But under the new "managed care" system, the state continues to pay the private companies as long as the person remains on the rolls, even when that person is no longer qualified and probably isn't using Medicaid anymore.
Say there are 1,700 people who paid taxes on incomes over
But you also can bet those pushing this agenda won't be saying: "Oops, didn't consider that when we all supported privatization a few years back."
___
(c)2019 The Advocate, Baton Rouge, La.
Visit The Advocate, Baton Rouge, La. at www.theadvocate.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



Citing tax concerns, group opposes fire protection district
O’Rourke champions US-Mexico border during Texas kickoff
Advisor News
- Metlife study finds less than half of US workforce holistically healthy
- Invigorating client relationships with AI coaching
- SEC: Get-rich-quick influencer Tai Lopez was running a Ponzi scam
- Companies take greater interest in employee financial wellness
- Tax refund won’t do what fed says it will
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- The structural rise of structured products
- How next-gen pricing tech can help insurers offer better annuity products
- Continental General Acquires Block of Life Insurance, Annuity and Health Policies from State Guaranty Associations
- Lincoln reports strong life/annuity sales, executes with ‘discipline and focus’
- LIMRA launches the Lifetime Income Initiative
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Bloomfield-based health care giant Cigna plans to lay off 2,000 employees worldwide
- Striking nurses back bill requiring health plans that receive state subsidies to disclose investments
- More than 50,000 in Mass. lose insurance plans after Congress fails to extend subsidies
- Bloomfield-based health care giant Cigna plans to lay off 2,000 employees worldwide
- STATEHOUSE: 'We don't see the savings': Indiana Medicaid restructuring bill draws pushback
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News