Maxwell: Floridians forced onto Slide Insurance while CEO gets $21 million
Let’s start today with a flashback look at a trio of headlines.
The first comes from a column I penned last year: “Florida homeowners become Slide customers — whether they want to or not.” That piece detailed Florida’s policy of forcing customers off the state-run
I had a lot of questions about this, as it struck me as a shady and extremely consumer-unfriendly practice. Other consumer advocates and even some insurance executives had questions as well.
Now let’s look at our second headline, one the
It probably won’t surprise you to learn that company here is, once again, Slide. Another industry publication reported that CEOs of other
And finally, here’s the third headline from a column I penned earlier this year: “You got conned. Home insurance costs still rising in Florida.”
That piece noted that, on the heels of
So now let’s put all these stories together:
Lawmakers forced more than 100,000 Floridians to become customers of private insurers and made it harder for homeowners to sue insurance companies.
Neither of those things brought rates down. To the contrary, they continued to rise.
But there is at least one group of people who seem to be thriving in Florida’s newly “reformed” insurance market — the CEOs.
That is Florida’s version of “reform.”
It’s worth noting that it’s not just
The piece — entitled “Size of Florida’s Slide Insurance Exec Compensation Has Tongues Wagging” — quoted one insurance executive as saying: “Capitalism is a great system, but this is out of control.”
When even the insurance execs think the system is grossly tilted in favor of the profiteers, there are serious problems.
You can read all these pieces for full details. But here’s a quick summary: A) Slide reported a
Still, the bottom line is that virtually none of what lawmakers have done has reduced costs for homeowners. Your rates were sky-high three years ago, and most have only gone up since.
That’s because the primary plank in the Republican-drafted-and-approved version of insurance “reform” was to make it harder for homeowners to sue their insurer — even if an insurer improperly denies you of benefits to which you’re entitled.
The theory was that, if the state saved the companies legal costs, the savings would trickle down to consumers. Except what fails to trickle down to the politicians who espouse this chamber-of-commerce talking point is reality. Companies don’t have to give you a nickel’s worth of savings unless they want to or unless it’s required.
As I’ve said for years, this state is geographically designed to be an expensive place to live; a hurricane-prone peninsula surrounded by rising floodwaters. So if lawmakers really want to make this state more affordable, they’re going to have to make serious investments in subsidies, either for the state’s Citizens program or for private companies.
But any financial gifts to the industry have to be accompanied by legislative demands that the companies also lower rates.
Trickle-down theories are often just a bunch of baloney — as evidenced by the nine consecutive quarters of increased costs Floridians faced after they were promised relief.
You got conned. Home insurance costs still rising in
If you want to see something different, you need to elect different people — lawmakers who won’t pass any kind of “reform” unless it is accompanied by lock-solid guarantees that your rates will drop.
If you feel like letting your lawmakers know that’s your plan, you can find their contact info at www.leg.state.fl.us
©2025 Orlando Sentinel. Visit orlandosentinel.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



Property insurance costs, storm resilience are priorities
American National Insurance Company Introduces Smart Start Accumulator Series
Advisor News
- More than half of recent retirees regret how they saved
- Tech group seeks additional context addressing AI risks in CSF 2.0 draft profile connecting frameworks
- How to discuss higher deductibles without losing client trust
- Take advantage of the exploding $800B IRA rollover market
- Study finds more households move investable assets across firms
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Court fines Cutter Financial $100,000, requires client notice of guilty verdict
- KBRA Releases Research – Private Credit: From Acquisitions to Partnerships—Asset Managers’ Growing Role With Life/Annuity Insurers
- $80k surrender charge at stake as Navy vet, Ameritas do battle in court
- Sammons Institutional Group® Launches Summit LadderedSM
- Protective Expands Life & Annuity Distribution with Alfa Insurance
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Trademark Application for “CVS FLEX BENEFITS” Filed: CVS Pharmacy Inc.
- Medicaid in Mississippi
- Policy Expert Offers Suggestions for Curbing US Health Care Costs
- Donahue & Horrow LLP Prevails in Federal ERISA Disability Case Published by the Court, Strengthening Protections for Long-Haul COVID Claimants
- Only 1/3 of US workers feel resilient
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News