Lori Falce: Trump's interest in interest rates
Aug. 1—On Wednesday,
Powell announced that the Fed was leaving short-term interest rates unchanged, declining to cut them from the 4.3% rate where they have stood for months.
That's because the Fed has two responsibilities. Established in 1913 in the wake of a 1907 financial crisis, the Fed's mandate is about the stabilizing of prices and keeping employment as high as possible.
Raise rates and it encourages people to keep their money in the bank instead of spending it. Drop rates and keeping money in the bank has less appeal, but borrowing money to buy a house or a car becomes attractive.
Powell doesn't want to do that. Pour on the fuel and you can get things too hot in the wrong way. As the nation's economic fire chief, Powell has no interest in starting a blaze he would have to put out.
The president should listen to Powell, even if he doesn't want to.
Instead, Trump is unleashing vitriol on the man at the economic helm, screaming at him in all-caps on social media.
The president is ignoring the fact that keeping the rates steady is how the Fed is allowing the country to stay as even as it has while the Trump administration juggles tariffs with every nation on the planet.
We can have someone turning international trade into a bingo game while someone keeps the banks open, or we can have interest rates on the floor while trade remains more rigidly in place. To do both at the same time is gambling with the rent money.
But maybe the president really wants this debate. Maybe he really wants to focus everyone on the spectacle of his epic feud between a 79-year-old commander-in-chief and a 72-year-old investment banker and lawyer. Maybe he wants people to focus on his own fiery outrage and Powell's subdued calm.
Because the alternative is that they keep asking about the Epstein files. That's where the interest really lies.
© 2025 Tribune-Review (Greensburg, Pa.). Visit www.triblive.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



Local part-time elected officials can lose health insurance, Indiana Supreme Court rules
Week in review
Advisor News
- Living longer, retiring poorer: Why fragmented systems are failing Americans
- Women say their advisors respect them, but talk down to them
- How PEPs compare with traditional 401(k)s
- Allianz studies why 42% of Americans retire sooner than expected
- Why advisors should be talking about life settlements
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Jackson Introduces Dow Jones Industrial Average Index Option, Flexible Premiums, Six-Year Rate Guarantee in Latest Registered Index-Linked Annuity Launch
- Senior Market Sales® Fortifies Annuity Reach With Acquisition of Retirement Planning Firm Stratton & Company
- NAIC regulators continue pushing for annuity illustration updates
- Wink: Flat first-quarter annuity sales fall just short of $100B
- 26North Re Agrees to Acquire 100% of Independent Insurance Group
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Cuts coming to Kentucky Medicaid program, social services and more
- Cigna drops coverage of GLP-1 obesity drugs for its own employees
- Turning 26 creates health care challenges for Americans
- Healthcare system spiraling out of control
- After Iowa Medicaid goes private, abuse rises, wait for services soars
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- KBRA Releases Research – Private Credit: A More Balanced Review of the NAIC PLR Review Process for Insurance Balance Sheets
- Jackson Introduces Dow Jones Industrial Average Index Option, Flexible Premiums, Six-Year Rate Guarantee in Latest Registered Index-Linked Annuity Launch
- State locates $107M in missing insurance funds
- The opportunity in the bottom half of the K-shaped economy
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CVS Health Corporation’s Aetna Inc. Subsidiaries
More Life Insurance News