Lori Falce: Trump's interest in interest rates
Aug. 1—On Wednesday,
Powell announced that the Fed was leaving short-term interest rates unchanged, declining to cut them from the 4.3% rate where they have stood for months.
That's because the Fed has two responsibilities. Established in 1913 in the wake of a 1907 financial crisis, the Fed's mandate is about the stabilizing of prices and keeping employment as high as possible.
Raise rates and it encourages people to keep their money in the bank instead of spending it. Drop rates and keeping money in the bank has less appeal, but borrowing money to buy a house or a car becomes attractive.
Powell doesn't want to do that. Pour on the fuel and you can get things too hot in the wrong way. As the nation's economic fire chief, Powell has no interest in starting a blaze he would have to put out.
The president should listen to Powell, even if he doesn't want to.
Instead, Trump is unleashing vitriol on the man at the economic helm, screaming at him in all-caps on social media.
The president is ignoring the fact that keeping the rates steady is how the Fed is allowing the country to stay as even as it has while the Trump administration juggles tariffs with every nation on the planet.
We can have someone turning international trade into a bingo game while someone keeps the banks open, or we can have interest rates on the floor while trade remains more rigidly in place. To do both at the same time is gambling with the rent money.
But maybe the president really wants this debate. Maybe he really wants to focus everyone on the spectacle of his epic feud between a 79-year-old commander-in-chief and a 72-year-old investment banker and lawyer. Maybe he wants people to focus on his own fiery outrage and Powell's subdued calm.
Because the alternative is that they keep asking about the Epstein files. That's where the interest really lies.
© 2025 Tribune-Review (Greensburg, Pa.). Visit www.triblive.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Local part-time elected officials can lose health insurance, Indiana Supreme Court rules
Week in review
Advisor News
- A hybrid approach outperforms the 4% Rule, researchers find
- The missing piece in most retirement plans
- Clients are bringing TikTok insurance advice into advisor meetings
- Embracing a family-centric approach to financial planning
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- AG Clark sues over effort to undermine Affordable Care Act protections
- Trump administration finalizes restrictions on Medicaid and CHIP funding for youth gender-affirming care
- Drugmakers, health insurers battle over coupons for high-cost medicine
- Idaho lawmakers look into a hospital insurance dispute
- Manatee County man faces felony charge after $34k disability fraud, deputies say
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Insurers, rating firms push back on NAIC credit rating oversight plan
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Symetra Named to PEOPLE® Companies That Care™ List for Second Consecutive Year
- LIMRA: Individual life sales continue growth trend in Q2, led by whole life and VUL
- New York Life Awards 20 Golden Futures Scholarships, Expanding Student Support Through Financial Education and Career Development
More Life Insurance News