Kentucky seeks big pension changes to stem tide of red ink
The plan to move most new hires into a 401(k)-style system would still put pressure on state taxpayers, who would be legally required to make annual payments of well over
"This is a big, big cost to the people of
The proposal unveiled by Bevin and the state's top two legislative leaders still must pass the legislature, most likely during a special session Bevin plans to call before the end of the year.
"This is purely a move touted by ultraconservative groups across the nation to privatize state services, remove a skilled state workforce and drive down wages for our future educators," said
No one knows how much the proposal would save, or how much it would require taxpayers to spend every year. Actuaries across the state's various retirement systems are calculating that. The governor's office said lawmakers won't vote on the proposal until those numbers are ready.
The plan spares the state's more than 166,000 current retirees from reductions in their pension checks.
In 401(k)-style plans, a public worker contributes to a retirement savings account that also gets contributions from taxpayers.
Under the current plan, workers earn predetermined benefits during their careers and receive guaranteed monthly checks once they retire.
The idea is controversial.
In a June report,
For decades, governments across the country have promised pension benefits without clear plans on how to pay for them. Many, including
"We are going to see a brutally difficult budget session," Bevin said.
Most new hires, plus anyone hired after
That concerns some teachers in
"That provision clearly violates the state's inviolable contract and will generate expensive lawsuits that the state is likely to lose," said
The Latest: States ask court to force health care subsidies
HCA Previews 2017 Third Quarter Results
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News