House Ways & Means Committee Issues Report on Tax Cuts, Jobs Act (Part 14 of 21) - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
November 16, 2017 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

House Ways & Means Committee Issues Report on Tax Cuts, Jobs Act (Part 14 of 21)

Targeted News Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 15 -- The House Ways and Means Committee issued a report (H.Rpt. 115-409) on legislation (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal 2018. The report was advanced by Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, on Nov. 13.

Calculation of special estimated tax payments based on tax benefit attributable to deduction

More specifically, present law imposes a requirement that the taxpayer make special estimated tax payments in an amount equal to the tax benefit attributable to the additional deduction allowed under the provision. If amounts are included in gross income as a result of a reduction in the taxpayer's special loss discount account or the liquidation or termination of the taxpayer's insurance business, and an additional tax is due for any year as a result of the inclusion, then an amount of the special estimated tax payments equal to such additional tax is applied against such additional tax. If there is an adjustment reducing the amount of additional tax against which the special estimated tax payment was applied, then in lieu of any credit or refund for the reduction, a special estimated tax payment is treated as made in an amount equal to the amount that would otherwise be allowable as a credit or refund.

The amount of the tax benefit attributable to the deduction is to be determined (under Treasury regulations (which have not been promulgated)) by taking into account tax benefits that would arise from the carryback of any net operating loss for the year as well as current year benefits. In addition, tax benefits for the current and carryback years are to take into account the benefit of filing a consolidated return with another insurance company without regard to the consolidation limitations imposed by section 1503(c).

The taxpayer's estimated tax payments under section 6655 are to be determined without regard to the additional deduction allowed under this provision and the special estimated tax payments. Legislative history697 indicates that it is intended that the taxpayer may apply the amount of an overpayment of any section 6655 estimated tax payments for the taxable year against the amount of the special estimated tax payment required under this provision. The special estimated tax payments under this provision are not treated as estimated tax payments for purposes of section 6655 (e.g., for purposes of calculating penalties or interest on underpayments of estimated tax) when such special estimated tax payments are made.

697See H.R. Rep. No. 100-1104, Conference Report to accompany H.R. 4333, the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, October 21, 1988, p. 174.

Refundable amount

To the extent that a special estimated tax payment is not used to offset additional tax due for any of the first 15 taxable years beginning after the year for which the payment was made, such special estimated tax payment is treated as an estimated tax payment made under section 6655 for the 16th year after the year for which the special estimated tax payment was made. If the amount of such deemed section 6655 payment, together with the taxpayer's other payments credited against tax liability for such 16th year, exceeds the tax liability for such year, then the excess (up to the amount of the deemed section 6655 payment) may be refunded to the taxpayer to the same extent provided under present law with respect to overpayments of tax.

Regulatory authority

In addition to the regulatory authority to adjust the amount of special estimated tax payments in the event of a change in the corporate tax rate, authority is provided to Treasury to prescribe regulations necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the provision.

Such regulations include those providing for the separate application of the provision with respect to each accident year. Separate application of the provision with respect to each accident year (i.e., applying a vintaging methodology) may be appropriate under regulations to determine the amount of tax liability for any taxable year against which special estimated tax payments are applied, and to determine the amount (if any) of special estimated tax payments remaining after the 15th year which may be available to be refunded to the taxpayer.

Regulatory authority is also provided to make such adjustments in the application of the provision as may be necessary to take into account the corporate alternative minimum tax. Under this regulatory authority, rules similar to those applicable in the case of a change in the corporate tax rate are intended to apply to determine the amount of special estimated tax payments that may be applied against tax calculated at the corporate alternative minimum tax rate. The special estimated tax payments are not treated as payments of regular tax for purposes of determining the taxpayer's alternative minimum tax liability.

Regulations have not been promulgated under section 847.

REASONS FOR CHANGE

The Committee believes that the special estimated tax payment rules add complexity to the tax law and do not improve the accuracy of income measurement of property and casualty insurers. The Committee bill therefore repeals these rules.

EXPLANATION OF PROVISION

The provision repeals section 847. Thus, the election to apply section 847, the additional deduction, special loss discount account, special estimated tax payment, and refundable amount rules of present law are eliminated.

The entire balance of an existing account is included in income of the taxpayer for the first taxable year beginning after 2017, and the entire amount of existing special estimated tax payments are applied against the amount of additional tax attributable to this inclusion. Any special estimated tax payments in excess of this amount are treated as estimated tax payments under section 6655.

EFFECTIVE DATE

The provision applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.

I. Compensation

1. Modification of limitation on excessive employee remuneration (sec. 3801 of the bill and sec. 162(m) of the Code)

PRESENT LAW

In general

An employer generally may deduct reasonable compensation for personal services as an ordinary and necessary business expense. Section 162(m) provides an explicit limitation on the deductibility of compensation expenses in the case of publicly traded corporate employers. The otherwise allowable deduction for compensation with respect to a covered employee of a publicly held corporation698 is limited to no more than $1 million per year.699 The deduction limitation applies when the deduction attributable to the compensation would otherwise be taken.

698A corporation is treated as publicly held if it has a class of common equity securities that is required to be registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Section 162(m)(2).

699Sec. 162(m). This deduction limitation applies for purposes of the regular income tax and the alternative minimum tax.

Covered employees

Section 162(m) defines a covered employee as (1) the chief executive officer of the corporation (or an individual acting in such capacity) as of the close of the taxable year and (2) any employee whose total compensation is required to be reported to shareholders under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") by reason of being among the corporation's four most highly compensated officers for the taxable year (other than the chief executive officer).700 Treasury regulations under section 162(m) provide that whether an employee is the chief executive officer or among the four most highly compensated officers should be determined pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules promulgated under the Exchange Act.

700Sec. 162(m)(3).

In 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission amended certain rules relating to executive compensation, including which officers' compensation must be disclosed under the Exchange Act. Under the new rules, such officers are (1) the principal executive officer (or an individual acting in such capacity), (2) the principal financial officer (or an individual acting in such capacity), and (3) the three most highly compensated officers, other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer.

In response to the Securities and Exchange Commission's new disclosure rules, the Internal Revenue Service issued updated guidance on identifying which employees are covered by section 162(m).701 The new guidance provides that "covered employee" means any employee who is (1) as of the close of the taxable year, the principal executive officer (or an individual acting in such capacity) defined in reference to the Exchange Act, or (2) among the three most highly compensated officers702 for the taxable year (other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer), again defined by reference to the Exchange Act. Thus, under current guidance, only four employees are covered under section 162(m) for any taxable year. Under Treasury regulations, the requirement that the individual meet the criteria as of the last day of the taxable year applies to both the principal executive officer and the three highest compensated officers.703

701Notice 2007-49, 2007-25 I.R.B. 1429.

702By reason of being among the officers whose total compensation is required to be reported to shareholders under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

703Treas. Reg. sec. 1.162-27(c)(2).

Definition of publicly held corporation

For purposes of the deduction disallowance of section 162(m), a publicly held corporation means any corporation issuing any class of common equity securities required to be registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.704 All U.S. publicly traded companies are subject to this registration requirement, including their foreign affiliates. A foreign company publicly traded through American depository receipts ("ADRs") is also subject to this registration requirement if more than 50 percent of the issuer's outstanding voting securities are held, directly or indirectly, by residents of United States and either (i) the majority of the executive officers or directors are United States citizens or residents, (ii) more than 50 percent of the assets of the issuer are located in the United States, or (iii) the business of the issuer is administered principally in the United States. Other foreign companies are not subject to the registration requirement.

704Sec. 162(m)(2).

Remuneration subject to the deduction limitation

In general

Unless specifically excluded, the deduction limitation applies to all remuneration for services, including cash and the cash value of all remuneration (including benefits) paid in a medium other than cash. If an individual is a covered employee for a taxable year, the deduction limitation applies to all compensation not explicitly excluded from the deduction limitation, regardless of whether the compensation is for services as a covered employee and regardless of when the compensation was earned. The $1 million cap is reduced by excess parachute payments (as defined in section 280G) that are not deductible by the corporation.705

705Sec. 162(m)(4)(F).

Certain types of compensation are not subject to the deduction limit and are not taken into account in determining whether other compensation exceeds $1 million. The following types of compensation are not taken into account: (1) remuneration payable on a commission basis;706 (2) remuneration payable solely on account of the attainment of one or more performance goals if certain outside director and shareholder approval requirements are met ("performance-based compensation");707 (3) payments to a tax-favored retirement plan (including salary reduction contributions); (4) amounts that are excludable from the executive's gross income (such as employer-provided health benefits and miscellaneous fringe benefits);708 and (5) any remuneration payable under a written binding contract which was in effect on February 17, 1993. In addition, remuneration does not include compensation for which a deduction is allowable after a covered employee ceases to be a covered employee. Thus, the deduction limitation often does not apply to deferred compensation that is otherwise subject to the deduction limitation (e.g., is not performance- based compensation) because the payment of compensation is deferred until after termination of employment.

706Sec. 162(m)(4)(B).

707Sec. 162(m)(4)(C).

708Secs. 105, 106, and 132.

Performance-based compensation Compensation qualifies for the exception for performance- based compensation only if (1) it is paid solely on account of the attainment of one or more performance goals, (2) the performance goals are established by a compensation committee consisting solely of two or more outside directors,709 (3) the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid, including the performance goals, are disclosed to and approved by the shareholders in a separate majority-approved vote prior to payment, and (4) prior to payment, the compensation committee certifies that the performance goals and any other material terms were in fact satisfied.

709A director is considered an outside director if he or she is not a current employee of the corporation (or related entities), is not a former employee of the corporation (or related entities) who is receiving compensation for prior services (other than benefits under a qualified retirement plan), was not an officer of the corporation (or related entities) at any time, and is not currently receiving compensation for personal services in any capacity (e.g., for services as a consultant) other than as a director.

Compensation (other than stock options or other stock appreciation rights ("SARs")) is not treated as paid solely on account of the attainment of one or more performance goals unless the compensation is paid to the particular executive pursuant to a pre-established objective performance formula or standard that precludes discretion. A stock option or SAR with an exercise price not less than the fair market value, on the date the option or SAR is granted, of the stock subject to the option or SAR, generally is treated as meeting the exception for performance-based compensation, provided that the requirements for outside director and shareholder approval are met (without the need for certification that the performance standards have been met). This is the case because the amount of compensation attributable to the options or SARs received by the executive is based solely on an increase in the corporation's stock price. Stock-based compensation is not treated as performance-based if it depends on factors other than corporate performance.

REASONS FOR CHANGE

The Committee believes that the significant exceptions to the limit on deductible executive compensation by publicly traded corporations have resulted in a shift away from cash compensation paid to senior executives in favor of stock options and other forms of performance pay. The Committee further believes this shift has led to perverse consequences resulting from the focus of such executives and businesses on quarterly results, rather than the long-term success of the company and its rank-and-file workers. Additionally, the Committee believes that aligning the deductibility limit between domestically traded publicly traded corporations and all foreign companies that trade ADRs in the United States, as well as certain private C corporations and S corporations, promotes fair tax treatment across similarly situated businesses. The Committee believes the law should be clarified to override administrative guidance, Notice 2007-49, 2007-25 I.R.B. 1429, which, contrary to the statute, limits the number of covered employees to four.

EXPLANATION OF PROVISION

Definition of covered employee

The provision revises the definition of covered employee to include both the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer. Further, an individual is a covered employee if the individual holds one of these positions at any time during the taxable year. The provision also defines as a covered employee the three (rather than four) most highly compensated officers for the taxable year (other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer) who are required to be reported on the company's proxy statement (i.e., the statement required pursuant to executive compensation disclosure rules promulgated under the Exchange Act) for the taxable year (or who would be required to be reported on such a statement for a company not required to make such a report to shareholders). This includes such officers of a corporation not required to file a proxy statement but which otherwise falls within the revised definition of a publicly held corporation, as well as such officers of a publicly traded corporation that would otherwise have been required to file a proxy statement for the year (for example, but for the fact that the corporation delisted its securities or underwent a transaction that resulted in the nonapplication of the proxy statement requirement).

In addition, if an individual is a covered employee with respect to a corporation for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, the individual remains a covered employee for all future years. Thus, an individual remains a covered employee with respect to compensation otherwise deductible for subsequent years, including for years during which the individual is no longer employed by the corporation and years after the individual has died. Compensation does not fail to be compensation with respect to a covered employee and thus subject to the deduction limit for a taxable year merely because the compensation is includible in the income of, or paid to, another individual, such as compensation paid to a beneficiary after the employee's death, or to a former spouse pursuant to a domestic relations order.

Definition of publicly held corporation

The provision extends the applicability of section 162(m) to include all domestic publicly traded corporations and all foreign companies publicly traded through ADRs. The proposed definition may include certain additional corporations that are not publicly traded, such as large private C or S corporations.

Performance-based compensation and commissions exceptions

The provision eliminates the exceptions for commissions and performance-based compensation from the definition of compensation subject to the deduction limit. Thus, such compensation is taken into account in determining the amount of compensation with respect to a covered employee for a taxable year that exceeds $1 million and is thus not deductible under section 162.

EFFECTIVE DATE

The provision applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.

2. Excise tax on excess tax-exempt organization executive compensation (sec. 3802 of the bill and sec. 4960 of the Code)

PRESENT LAW

Taxable employers and other service recipients generally may deduct reasonable compensation expenses.710 However, in some cases, compensation in excess of specific levels is not deductible.

710Sec. 162(a)(1).

A publicly held corporation generally cannot deduct more than $1 million of compensation (that is not compensation otherwise excepted from this limit) in a taxable year for each "covered employee."711 For this purpose, a covered employee is the corporation's principal executive officer (or an individual acting in such capacity) defined in reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") as of the close of the taxable year, or any employee whose total compensation is required to be reported to shareholders under the Exchange Act by reason of being among the corporation's three most highly compensated officers for the taxable year (other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer).712

711Sec. 162(m)(1). Under section 162(m)(6), limits apply to deductions for compensation of individuals performing services for certain health insurance providers.

712Notice 2007-49, 2007-2 I.R.B. 1429.

Unless an exception applies, generally a corporation cannot deduct that portion of the aggregate present value of a "parachute payment" which equals or exceeds three times the "base amount" of certain service providers. The nondeductible excess is an "excess parachute payment."713 A parachute payment is generally a payment of compensation that is contingent on a change in corporate ownership or control made to certain officers, shareholders, and highly compensated individuals.714 An individual's base amount is the average annualized compensation includible in the individual's gross income for the five taxable years ending before the date on which the change in ownership or control occurs.715 Certain amounts are not considered parachute payments, including payments under a qualified retirement plan, a simplified employee pension plan, or a simple retirement account.716

713Sec. 280G(a) and (b)(1).

714Sec. 280G(b)(2) and (c).

715Sec. 280G(b)(3).

716Secs. 401(a), 403(a), 408(k), and 408(p).

These deduction limits generally do not affect a tax-exempt organization.

REASONS FOR CHANGE

The Committee believes that tax-exempt organizations enjoy a tax subsidy from the Federal government because contributions to such organizations are generally deductible and such organizations are generally not subject to tax (except on unrelated business income). As a result, such organizations are subject to the requirement that they use their resources for specific purposes, and the Committee believes that excessive compensation (including excessive severance packages) paid to senior executives of such organizations diverts resources from those particular purposes. The Committee further believes that alignment of the tax treatment of excessive executive compensation (as top executives may inappropriately divert organizational resources into excessive compensation) between for-profit and tax-exempt employers furthers the Committee's larger tax reform effort of making the system fairer for all businesses.

EXPLANATION OF PROVISION

Under the provision, an employer is liable for an excise tax equal to 20 percent of the sum of (1) any remuneration (other than an excess parachute payment) in excess of $1 million paid to a covered employee by an applicable tax-exempt organization for a taxable year, and (2) any excess parachute payment (under a new definition for this purpose that relates solely to separation pay) paid by the applicable tax-exempt organization to a covered employee. Accordingly, the excise tax applies as a result of an excess parachute payment, even if the covered employee's remuneration does not exceed $1 million.

For purposes of the provision, a covered employee is an employee (including any former employee) of an applicable tax- exempt organization if the employee is one of the five highest compensated employees of the organization for the taxable year or was a covered employee of the organization (or a predecessor) for any preceding taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016. An "applicable tax-exempt organization" is an organization exempt from tax under section 501(a), an exempt farmers' cooperative,717 a Federal, State or local governmental entity with excludable income,718 or a political organization.719

717Sec. 521(b).

718Sec. 115(1).

719Sec. 527(e)(1).

Remuneration means wages as defined for income tax withholding purposes,720 but does not include any designated Roth contribution.721 Remuneration of a covered employee includes any remuneration paid with respect to employment of the covered employee by any person or governmental entity related to the applicable tax-exempt organization. A person or governmental entity is treated as related to an applicable tax- exempt organization if the person or governmental entity (1) controls, or is controlled by, the organization, (2) is controlled by one or more persons that control the organization, (3) is a supported organization722 during the taxable year with respect to the organization, (4) is a supporting organization723 during the taxable year with respect to the organization, or (5) in the case of a voluntary employees' beneficiary association ("VEBA"),724 establishes, maintains, or makes contributions to the VEBA. However, remuneration of a covered employee that is not deductible by reason of the $1 million limit on deductible compensation is not taken into account for purposes of the provision.

720Sec. 3401(a).

721Under section 402A(c), a designated Roth contribution is an elective deferral (that is, a contribution to a tax-favored employer- sponsored retirement plan made at the election of an employee) that the employee designates as not being excludable from income.

722Sec. 509(f)(3). A technical amendment to the provision is needed to reflect the correct statutory citation.

723Sec. 509(a)(3).

724Sec. 501(c)(9). A technical amendment to the provision is needed to reflect the correct statutory citation.

Under the provision, an excess parachute payment is the amount by which any parachute payment exceeds the portion of the base amount allocated to the payment. A parachute payment is a payment in the nature of compensation to (or for the benefit of) a covered employee if the payment is contingent on the employee's separation from employment and the aggregate present value of all such payments equals or exceeds three times the base amount. The base amount is the average annualized compensation includible in the covered employee's gross income for the five taxable years ending before the date of the employee's separation from employment. Parachute payments do not include payments under a qualified retirement plan, a simplified employee pension plan, a simple retirement account, a tax-deferred annuity,725 or an eligible deferred compensation plan of a State or local government employer.726

725Sec. 403(b).

726Sec. 457(b).

The employer of a covered employee is liable for the excise tax. If remuneration of a covered employee from more than one employer is taken into account in determining the excise tax, each employer is liable for the tax in an amount that bears the same ratio to the total tax as the remuneration paid by that employer bears to the remuneration paid by all employers to the covered employee.

EFFECTIVE DATE

The provision applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.

3. Treatment of qualified equity grants (sec. 3803 of the bill and secs. 83, 3401, and 6051 of the Code)

PRESENT LAW

Income tax treatment of employer stock transferred to an employee

Specific rules apply to property, including employer stock, transferred to an employee in connection with the performance of services.727 These rules govern the amount and timing of income inclusion by the employee and the amount and timing of the employer's compensation deduction.

727Sec. 83. Section 83 applies generally to transfers of any property, not just employer stock, in connection with the performance of services by any service provider, not just an employee. However, the provision described herein applies only with respect to certain employer stock transferred to employees.

Under these rules, an employee generally must recognize income in the taxable year in which the employee's right to the stock is transferable or is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier (referred to herein as "substantially vested"). Thus, if the employee's right to the stock is substantially vested when the stock is transferred to the employee, the employee recognizes income in the taxable year of such transfer, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the stock as of the date of transfer (less any amount paid for the stock). If at the time the stock is transferred to the employee, the employee's right to the stock is not substantially vested (referred to herein as "nonvested"), the employee does not recognize income attributable to the stock transfer until the taxable year in which the employee's right becomes substantially vested. In this case, the amount includible in the employee's income is the fair market value of the stock as of the date that the employee's right to the stock is substantially vested (less any amount paid for the stock). However, if the employee's right to the stock is nonvested at the time the stock is transferred to employee, under section 83(b), the employee may elect within 30 days of transfer to recognize income in the taxable year of transfer, referred to as a "section 83(b)" election.728 If a proper and timely election under section 83(b) is made, the amount of compensatory income is capped at the amount equal to the fair market value of the stock as of the date of transfer (less any amount paid for the stock). A section 83(b) election is available with respect to grants of "restricted stock" (nonvested stock), and does not generally apply to the grant of options.

728Under Treas. Reg. sec. 1.83-2, the employee makes an election by filing with the Internal Revenue Service a written statement that includes the fair market value of the property at the time of transfer and the amount (if any) paid for the property. The employee must also provide a copy of the statement to the employer.

In general, an employee's right to stock or other property is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture if the employee's right to full enjoyment of the property is subject to a condition, such as the future performance of substantial services.729 An employee's right to stock or other property is transferable if the employee can transfer an interest in the property to any person other than the transferor of the property.730 Thus, generally, employer stock transferred to an employee by an employer is not transferable merely because the employee can sell it back to the employer.

729See section 83(c)(1) and Treas. Reg. sec. 1.83-3(c) for the definition of substantial risk of forfeiture.

730Treas. Reg. sec. 1.83-3(d). In addition, under section 83(c)(2), the right to stock is transferable only if any transferee's right to the stock would not be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

In the case of stock transferred to an employee, the employer is allowed a deduction (to the extent a deduction for a business expense is otherwise allowable) equal to the amount included in the employee's income as a result of transfer of the stock.731 The employer deduction generally is permitted in the employer's taxable year in which or with which ends the employee's taxable year when the amount is included and properly reported in the employee's income.732

731Sec. 83(h).

732Treas. Reg. sec. 1.83-6.

These rules do not apply to the grant of a nonqualified option on employer stock unless the option has a readily ascertainable fair market value.733 Instead, these rules apply to the transfer of employer stock by the employee on exercise of the option. That is, if the right to the stock is substantially vested on transfer (the time of exercise), income recognition applies for the taxable year of transfer. If the right to the stock is nonvested on transfer, the timing of income inclusion is determined under the rules applicable to the transfer of nonvested stock. In either case, the amount includible in income by the employee is the fair market value of the stock as of the required time of income inclusion, less the exercise price paid by the employee. A section 83(b) election generally does not apply to the grant of options. If upon the exercise of an option, nonvested stock is transferred to the employee, a section 83(b) election may apply. The employer's deduction is generally determined under the rules that apply to transfers of restricted stock, but a special accrual rule may apply under Treasury regulations when the transferred stock is substantially vested.734

733See section 83(e)(3) and Treas. Reg. sec. 1.83-7. A nonqualified option is an option on employer stock that is not a statutory option, discussed below.

734Treas. Reg. sec. 1.83-6(a)(3).

Employment taxes and reporting

Employment taxes generally consist of taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act ("FICA"), tax under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act ("FUTA"), and income taxes required to be withheld by employers from wages paid to employees ("income tax withholding").735 Unless an exception applies under the applicable rules, compensation provided to an employee constitutes wages subject to these taxes.

735Secs. 3101-3128 (FICA), 3301-3311 (FUTA), and 3401-3404 (income tax withholding). Instead of FICA taxes, railroad employers and employees are subject, under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act ("RRTA"), sections 3201-3241, to taxes equivalent to FICA taxes with respect to compensation as defined for RRTA purposes. Sections 3501- 3510 provide additional rules relating to all these taxes.

FICA imposes tax on employers and employees, generally based on the amount of wages paid to an employee during the year. Special rules as to the timing and amount of FICA taxes apply in the case of nonqualified deferred compensation, as defined for FICA purposes.736

736Sec. 3121(v); Treas. Reg. sec. 31.3121(v)(2).

The tax imposed on the employer and on the employee is each composed of two parts: (1) the Social Security or old age, survivors, and disability insurance ("OASDI") tax equal to 6.2 percent of covered wages up to the OASDI wage base ($127,200 for 2017); and (2) the Medicare or hospital insurance ("HI") tax equal to 1.45 percent of all covered wages.737 The employee portion of FICA tax generally must be withheld and, along with the employer portion, remitted to the Federal government by the employer. FICA tax withholding applies regardless of whether compensation is provided in the form of cash or a noncash form, such as a transfer of property (including employer stock) or in-kind benefits.738

737The employee portion of the HI tax under FICA (not the employer portion) is increased by an additional tax of 0.9 percent on wages received in excess of a threshold amount. The threshold amount is $250,000 in the case of a joint return, $125,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 in any other case.

738Under section 3501(b), employment taxes with respect to noncash fringe benefits are to be collected (or paid) by the employer at the time and in the manner prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury ("Treasury"). Announcement 85-113, 1985-31 I.R.B. 31, provides guidance on the application of employment taxes with respect to noncash fringe benefits.

FUTA imposes a tax on employers of six percent of wages up to the FUTA wage base of $7,000.

Income tax withholding generally applies when wages are paid by an employer to an employee, based on graduated withholding rates set out in tables published by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS").739 Like FICA tax withholding, income tax withholding applies regardless of whether compensation is provided in the form of cash or a noncash form, such as a transfer of property (including employer stock) or in-kind benefits.

739Sec. 3402. Specific withholding rates apply in the case of supplemental wages.

An employer is required to furnish each employee with a statement of compensation information for a calendar year, including taxable compensation, FICA wages, and withheld income and FICA taxes.740 In addition, information relating to certain nontaxable items must be reported, such as certain retirement and health plan contributions. The statement, made on Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, must be provided to each employee by January 31 of the succeeding year.741

740Secs. 6041 and 6051.

741Employers send Form W-2 information to the Social Security Administration, which records information relating to Social Security and Medicare and forwards the Form W-2 information to the IRS. Employees include a copy of Form W-2 with their income tax returns.

Statutory options

Two types of statutory options apply with respect to employer stock: incentive stock options ("ISOs") and options provided under an employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP").742 Stock received pursuant to a statutory option is subject to special rules, rather than the rules for nonqualified options, discussed above. No amount is includible in an employee's income on the grant, vesting, or exercise of a statutory option.743 In addition, generally no deduction is allowed to the employer with respect to the option or the stock transferred to an employee.

742Sections 421-424 govern statutory options. Section 423(b)(5) requires that, under the terms of an ESPP, all employees granted options generally must have the same rights and privileges.

743Under section 56(b)(3), this income tax treatment with respect to stock received on exercise of an ISO does not apply for purposes of the alternative minimum tax under section 55.

If a holding requirement is met with respect to the stock transferred on exercise of a statutory option and the employee later disposes of the stock, the employee's gain generally is treated as capital gain rather than ordinary income. Under the holding requirement, the employee must not dispose of the stock within two years after the date the option is granted and also must not dispose of the stock within one year after the date the option is exercised. If a disposition occurs before the end of the required holding period (a "disqualifying disposition"), the employee recognizes ordinary income in the taxable year in which the disqualifying disposition occurs and the employer may be allowed a corresponding deduction in the taxable year in which such disposition occurs. The amount of ordinary income recognized when a disqualifying disposition occurs generally equals the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise (that is, when the stock was transferred to the employee) less the exercise price paid.

Employment taxes do not apply with respect to the grant or vesting of a statutory option, transfer of stock pursuant to the option, or a disposition (including a disqualifying disposition) of the stock.744 However, certain special reporting requirements apply.

744Secs. 3121(a)(22), 3306(b)(19), and the last sentence of section 421(b).

Nonqualified deferred compensation

Compensation is generally includible in an employee's income when paid to the employee. However, in the case of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan,745 unless the arrangement either is exempt from or meets the requirements of section 409A, the amount of deferred compensation is first includible in income for the taxable year when not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (as defined),746 even if payment will not occur until a later year.747 In general, to meet the requirements of section 409A, the time when nonqualified deferred compensation will be paid, as well as the amount, must be specified at the time of deferral with limits on further deferral after the time for payment. Various other requirements apply, including that payment can only occur on specific defined events.

745Compensation earned by an employee is generally paid to the employee shortly after being earned. However, in some cases, payment is deferred to a later period, referred to as "deferred compensation." Deferred compensation may be provided through a plan that receives tax- favored treatment, such as a qualified retirement plan under section 401(a). Deferred compensation provided through a plan that is not eligible for tax-favored treatment is referred to as "nonqualified" deferred compensation.

746Treas. Reg. sec. 1.409A-1(d).

747Section 409A and the regulations thereunder provide rules for nonqualified deferred compensation. Compensation that fails to meet the requirements of section 409A is also subject to an additional income tax of 20% on amounts includible in income, and, along with a potential interest factor tax, applies to increases in the value of the failed compensation each year until it is paid.

Various exemptions from section 409A apply, including transfers of property subject to section 83.748 Nonqualified options are not automatically exempt from section 409A, but may be structured so as not to be considered nonqualified deferred compensation.749 A restricted stock unit ("RSU") is a term used for an arrangement under which an employee has the right to receive at a specified time in the future an amount determined by reference to the value of one or more shares of employer stock. An employee's right to receive the future amount may be subject to a condition, such as continued employment for a certain period or the attainment of certain performance goals. The payment to the employee of the amount due under the arrangement is referred to as settlement of the RSU. The arrangement may provide for the settlement amount to be paid in cash or as a transfer of employer stock (or either). An arrangement providing RSUs is generally considered a nonqualified deferred compensation plan and is subject to the rules, including the limits, of section 409A. The employer deduction generally is permitted in the employer's taxable year in which or with which ends the employee's taxable year when the amount is included and properly reported in the employee's income.750

748Treas. Reg. sec. 1.409A-1(b)(6).

749Treas. Reg. sec. 1.409A-1(b)(5). In addition, statutory option arrangements are not nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements.

750Sec. 404(a)(5).

REASONS FOR CHANGE

Employer stock may provide a valuable form of employee compensation. In some cases, the transfer of employer stock with a high fair market value may result in compensation income, and a related tax liability, that is disproportionately large in comparison to an employee's regular salary or wages. In the case of publicly traded employer stock, an employee may sell some of the stock to provide funds to cover that tax liability. However, that approach often is not available in the case of a closely held company that restricts the transferability of its stock. This may make employer stock a less attractive form of compensation. In the case of stock options, the inability to pay the tax liability that would result from the stock received on exercise of the option may mean employees let options lapse, thus losing compensation they have already earned. The Committee wishes to address these situations by allowing employees to elect to defer recognition of income attributable to stock received on exercise of an option or settlement of an RSU until an opportunity to sell some of the stock arises, but in no event longer than five years from the date that the employee's right to the stock becomes substantially vested.

EXPLANATION OF PROVISION

In general

The provision allows a qualified employee to elect to defer, for income tax purposes, the inclusion in income of the amount of income attributable to qualified stock transferred to the employee by the employer. An election to defer income inclusion ("inclusion deferral election") with respect to qualified stock must be made no later than 30 days after the first time the employee's right to the stock is substantially vested or is transferable, whichever occurs earlier.

If an employee elects to defer income inclusion under the provision, the income must be included in the employee's income for the taxable year that includes the earliest of (1) the first date the qualified stock becomes transferable, including, solely for this purpose, transferable to the employer;751 (2) the date the employee first becomes an excluded employee (as described below); (3) the first date on which any stock of the employer becomes readily tradable on an established securities market;752 (4) the date five years after the first date the employee's right to the stock becomes substantially vested; or (5) the date on which the employee revokes her inclusion deferral election.753

751Thus, for this purpose, the qualified stock is considered transferable if the employee has the ability to sell the stock to the employer (or any other person).

752An established securities market is determined for this purpose by the Secretary, but does not include any market unless the market is recognized as an established securities market for purposes of another Code provision.

753An inclusion deferral election is revoked at the time and in the manner as the Secretary provides.

An inclusion deferral election is made in a manner similar to the manner in which a section 83(b) election is made.754 The provision does not apply to income with respect to nonvested stock that is includible as a result of a section 83(b) election. The provision clarifies that Section 83 (other than the provision), including subsection (b), shall not apply to RSUs. Therefore, RSUs are not eligible for a section 83(b) election. This is the case because, absent this provision, RSUs are nonqualified deferred compensation and therefore subject to the rules that apply to nonqualified deferred compensation.

754Thus, as in the case of a section 83(b) election under present law, the employee must provide a copy of the inclusion deferral election to the employer.

An employee may not make an inclusion deferral election for a year with respect to qualified stock if, in the preceding calendar year, the corporation purchased any of its outstanding stock unless at least 25 percent of the total dollar amount of the stock so purchased is stock with respect to which an inclusion deferral election is in effect ("deferral stock") and the determination of which individuals from whom deferral stock is purchased is made on a reasonable basis.755 For purposes of this requirement, stock purchased from an individual is not treated as deferral stock (and the purchase is not treated as a purchase of deferral stock) if, immediately after the purchase, the individual holds any deferral stock with respect to which an inclusion deferral election has been in effect for a longer period than the election with respect to the purchased stock. Thus, in general, in applying the purchase requirement, an individual's deferral stock with respect to which an inclusion deferral election has been in effect for the longest periods must be purchased first. A corporation that has deferral stock outstanding as of the beginning of any calendar year and that purchases any of its outstanding stock during the calendar year must report on its income tax return for the taxable year in which, or with which, the calendar year ends the total dollar amount of the outstanding stock purchased during the calendar year and such other information as the Secretary may require for purposes of administering this requirement.

755This requirement is met if the stock purchased by the corporation includes all the corporation's outstanding deferral stock.

A qualified employee may make an inclusion deferral election with respect to qualified stock attributable to a statutory option.756 In that case, the option is not treated as a statutory option and the rules relating to statutory options and related stock do not apply. In addition, an arrangement under which an employee may receive qualified stock is not treated as a nonqualified deferred compensation plan solely because of an employee's inclusion deferral election or ability to make an election.

756For purposes of the requirement that an ESPP provide employees with the same rights and privileges, the rules of the provision apply in determining which employees have the right to make an inclusion deferral election with respect to stock received under the ESPP.

Deferred income inclusion applies also for purposes of the employer's deduction of the amount of income attributable to the qualified stock. That is, if an employee makes an inclusion deferral election, the employer's deduction is deferred until the employer's taxable year in which or with which ends the taxable year of the employee for which the amount is included in the employee's income as described in (1)-(5) above.

Qualified employee and qualified stock

Under the provision, a qualified employee means an individual who is not an excluded employee and who agrees, in the inclusion deferral election, to meet the requirements necessary (as determined by the Secretary) to ensure the income tax withholding requirements of the employer corporation with respect to the qualified stock (as described below) are met. For this purpose, an excluded employee with respect to a corporation is any individual (1) who was a one-percent owner of the corporation at any time during the 10 preceding calendar years,757 (2) who is, or has been at any prior time, the chief executive officer or chief financial officer of the corporation or an individual acting in either capacity, (3) who is a family member of an individual described in (1) or (2),758 or (4) who has been one of the four highest compensated officers of the corporation for any of the 10 preceding taxable years.759

757One-percent owner status is determined under the top-heavy rules for qualified retirement plans, that is, section 416(i)(1)(B)(ii).

758In the case of one-percent owners, this results from application of the attribution rules of section 318 under section 416(i)(1)(B)(i)(II). Family members are determined under section 318(a)(1) and generally include an individual's spouse, children, grandchildren and parents.

759These officers are determined on the basis of shareholder disclosure rules for compensation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as if such rules applied to the corporation.

Qualified stock is any stock of a corporation if--

- an employee receives the stock in connection with the exercise of an option or in settlement of an RSU, and

- the option or RSU was granted by the corporation to the employee in connection with the performance of services and in a year in which the corporation was an eligible corporation (as described below).

However, qualified stock does not include any stock if, at the time the employee's right to the stock becomes substantially vested, the employee may sell the stock to, or otherwise receive cash in lieu of stock from, the corporation. Qualified stock can only be such if it relates to stock received in connection with options or RSUs, and does not include stock received in connection with other forms of equity compensation, including stock appreciation rights or restricted stock.

A corporation is an eligible corporation with respect to a calendar year if (1) no stock of the employer corporation (or any predecessor) is readily tradable on an established securities market during any preceding calendar year,760 and (2) the corporation has a written plan under which, in the calendar year, not less than 80 percent of all employees who provide services to the corporation in the United States (or any U.S. possession) are granted stock options, or restricted stock units ("RSUs"), with the same rights and privileges to receive qualified stock ("80-percent requirement").761 For this purpose, in general, the determination of rights and privileges with respect to stock is determined in a similar manner as provided under the present-law ESPP rules.762 However, employees will not fail to be treated as having the same rights and privileges to receive qualified stock solely because the number of shares available to all employees is not equal in amount, provided that the number of shares available to each employee is more than a de minimis amount. In addition, rights and privileges with respect to the exercise of a stock option are not treated for this purpose as the same as rights and privileges with respect to the settlement of an RSU.763

760This requirement continues to apply up to the time an inclusion deferral election is made. That is, under the provision, no inclusion deferral election may be made with respect to qualified stock if any stock of the corporation is readily tradable on an established securities market at any time before the election is made.

761In applying the requirement that 80 percent of employees receive stock options or RSUs, excluded employees and part-time employees are not taken into account. For this purpose, part-time employee is defined under section 4980G(d)(4), as an employee who is customarily employed for fewer than 30 hours per week. (A technical amendment to the provision is needed to reflect the correct statutory citation defining part-time employees.) 762Sec. 423(b)(5).

763Under a transition rule, in the case of a calendar year beginning before January 1, 2018, the 80-percent requirement is applied without regard to whether the rights and privileges with respect to the qualified stock are the same.

For purposes of the provision, corporations that are members of the same controlled group764 are treated as one corporation.

764As defined in sec. 1563(a).

Notice, withholding and reporting requirements

Under the provision, a corporation that transfers qualified stock to a qualified employee must provide a notice to the qualified employee at the time (or a reasonable period before) the employee's right to the qualified stock is substantially vested (and income attributable to the stock would first be includible absent an inclusion deferral election). The notice must (1) certify to the employee that the stock is qualified stock, and (2) notify the employee (a) that the employee may (if eligible) elect to defer income inclusion with respect to the stock and (b) that, if the employee makes an inclusion deferral election, the amount of income required to be included at the end of the deferral period will be based on the value of the stock at the time the employee's right to the stock first becomes substantially vested, notwithstanding whether the value of the stock has declined during the deferral period (including whether the value of the stock has declined below the employee's tax liability with respect to such stock), and the amount of income to be included at the end of the deferral period will be subject to withholding as provided under the provision, as well as of the employee's responsibilities with respect to required withholding. Failure to provide the notice may result in the imposition of a penalty of $100 for each failure, subject to a maximum penalty of $50,000 for all failures during any calendar year.

An inclusion deferral election applies only for income tax purposes. The application of FICA and FUTA are not affected. The provision includes specific income tax withholding and reporting requirements with respect to income subject to an inclusion deferral election.

For the taxable year for which income subject to an inclusion deferral election is required to be included in income by the employee (as described above), the amount required to be included in income is treated as wages with respect to which the employer is required to withhold income tax at a rate not less than the highest income tax rate applicable to individual taxpayers.765 The employer must report on Form W-2 the amount of income covered by an inclusion deferral election (1) for the year of deferral and (2) for the year the income is required to be included in income by the employee. In addition, for any calendar year, the employer must report on Form W-2 the aggregate amount of income covered by inclusion deferral elections, determined as of the close of the calendar year.

765That is, the maximum rate of tax in effect for the year under section 1. The provision specifies that qualified stock is treated as a noncash fringe benefit for income tax withholding purposes.

EFFECTIVE DATE

The provision generally applies with respect to stock attributable to options exercised or RSUs settled after December 31, 2017. Under a transition rule, until the Secretary (or the Secretary's delegate) issues regulations or other guidance implementing the 80-percent and employer notice requirements under the provision, a corporation will be treated as complying with those requirements (respectively) if it complies with a reasonable good faith interpretation of the requirements. The penalty for a failure to provide the notice required under the provision applies to failures after December 31, 2017.

Continues with Part 15 of 21

TARGETED NEWS SERVICE: Myron Struck, editor; 703/304-1897; editor@targetednews.com; http://www.targetednews.com

Older

North American Health Headlines at 9:53 p.m. EST

Newer

Reinsurance in Saudi Arabia, Key Trends and Opportunities to 2021

Advisor News

  • A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
  • Financial stress leaves less room for retirement saving
  • Giving while you’re living: 3 frequently asked questions about gifting
  • Helping clients prepare for one of their biggest retirement expenses
  • Important year-end financial conversations every advisor must have
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
  • What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
  • AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
  • Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
  • AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • The flawed logic of Medicare for All
  • Bailey pushes back on Abbott tax message
  • Commentary: Health coverage for all
  • Healthcare workers see rising insurance costs
  • Norwood Davis, former CEO of health insurance giant Trigon, dies at 86
Sponsor
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • Study Results from Cornell University in the Area of Insurance Reported (Regulatory Competition In the Us Life Insurance Industry): Insurance
  • AM Best Comments on Issuer Credit Ratings of Pacific Life Insurance Company’s Commercial Paper Following Amendment to Program
  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Protective Life Corporation and Its Key Subsidiaries
  • ICICI Life Insurance names Sidharatha Mishra managing director, CEO
  • Lawsuit alleges companies collected $30 million in ‘illegal wager on human life’
Sponsor
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Press Releases

  • Lauren Sinnott Named to Ragan’s Top Women in Marketing Awards, Class of 2026 
  • Classic Car Insurer OpenRoad Insurance Expands to 40 U.S. States in Two Years
  • How Aspire General Turned an Early Technology Bet Into Claims Automation at Scale with Kyber
  • Adjusto launches AI-Native contents claims services powered by its technology platform
  • URL Insurance Group Celebrates 40 Years of Service, Growth, and Industry Leadership
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.