House Oversight & Accountability Subcommittee Issues Testimony From Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight Director Montz
* * *
Chairs Comer and McClain, Ranking Members Raskin and Porter, and distinguished Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to provide an update on the
Over the last decade, DACA has provided peace of mind and work authorization to more than 800,000 Dreamers. On
On
* * *
* * *
This NPRM has a proposed effective date of
The proposed change to no longer exclude DACA recipients from CMS definitions of "lawfully present" would align with the
Deferred action recipients, including DACA recipients, have historically been considered "lawfully present" for purposes of certain
In order to enroll in a Qualified Health Plan (QHP) through an Exchange, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) generally requires an individual to be either a citizen or national of
* * *
2 Section 1903(v)(4) of the Social Security Act.
3 87 FR 53152.
* * *
In general, for Medicaid and CHIP, noncitizens must have a status that is considered "qualified", which includes lawful permanent resident, refugee, and asylee status; and many qualified noncitizens, including lawful permanent residents, must wait for five years before becoming eligible for full coverage. The Children's Health Insurance Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) provided a separate exception that allows states an option to cover lawfully residing children and pregnant individuals in Medicaid and CHIP, including individuals who otherwise must wait for five years, commonly referred to as the CHIPRA 214 option./4
Although HHS initially defined "lawfully present" to exclude DACA recipients in 2012, new information regarding DACA recipients' access to health insurance coverage has emerged that prompted the agency to reconsider its position. For example, while a 2021 survey of DACA recipients/5 found that DACA may facilitate access to health insurance through employer-based plans, more than one-third (34 percent) of DACA recipient respondents reported that they were not covered by health insurance. These new findings suggest that, without additional coverage options, many DACA recipients could be left without access to affordable health care. Accordingly, the proposed rule would remove the exclusion of DACA recipients from the definition of "lawfully present," thereby treating DACA recipients the same as other deferred action recipients under the law.
* * *
4 Under CMS State Health Official (SHO) Letter #10-006, CMS has interpreted "lawfully residing" to mean that an individual is lawfully present in
5 https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/NILC_DACA-Report_060122.pdf.
* * *
Individuals without health insurance are less likely to receive preventative or routine health screenings and may delay necessary medical care. In a 2022 survey/6 of DACA recipients, nearly half (48 percent) of respondents said they experienced a delay in medical care due to their immigration status, and more than two-thirds (71 percent) of respondents said they or a family member were unable to pay medical bills or expenses. The COVID-19 public health emergency further highlighted the need for this population to have access to high quality, affordable health coverage. According to a demographic estimate by the
During the height of the pandemic, essential workers were disproportionately likely to contract COVID-19. These factors emphasize how increasing access to affordable health insurance would improve the health and well-being of many DACA recipients currently without coverage. Of the 129,000 uninsured DACA recipients impacted by the proposals in this rule, we estimate that 112,000 could receive health care coverage through a QHP through an Exchange, 4,000 through a BHP, and 13,000 through Medicaid or CHIP under the CHIPRA 214 option.
As the proposed rule explains, including DACA recipients in the definition of "lawfully present" would align with the text and goals of the ACA and CHIPRA--specifically, to lower the number of people who are uninsured in
* * *
6 "DACA Recipients' Access to Health Care: 2023 Report."
7 https://cmsny.org/daca-essential-workers-covid/.
* * *
Original text here: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/FINAL_CMS-Testimony-on-DACA-Health-Benefits-7.18.23.pdf
Mont. U.S. Attorney: Owner of Insurance Company in Rosebud County Charged in Scheme to Defraud Customers
Litigation: SEC Vs. Amit Dagar, Atul Bhiwapurkar
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News