House OKs insurance rate regulation bill
* A bill giving the
* The bill would prohibit "excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory" premiums.
* JB Pritzker called for rate review authority over homeowners insurance last summer following
* Secretary of State
SPRINGFIELD – The
Sign up for our free newsletters.
Two proposals that started as separate pieces of legislation were combined into a single bill that passed the House
Pritzker initially called for rate review authority over homeowners insurance last summer after
Pritzker, however, questioned that rationale. He and legislative leaders suggested the company may have been shifting losses from disasters in other states onto
He also used the controversy to highlight the fact that, unlike most other states,
Separately, Secretary of State
Neither bill made it through the
Product of negotiations
The bill that emerged in the House last week was the product of continued negotiations among lawmakers and the governor's office, although the insurance industry says it still opposes the final product.
Senate Bill 1486, as amended by the House, would prohibit companies from charging "excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory" rates for auto and homeowners insurance. And, starting
It would also establish a procedure for the
If the agency finds them to be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory, it would notify the company, which could then request an administrative hearing. If, after the hearing, the agency still finds the rates excessive, it could reject the rate filing. It would also have the authority to order the company to rebate customers for any excessive premiums it collected.
The bill would also prohibit the practice of "cost-shifting" by requiring companies to use "credible, state-specific" data in setting rates whenever such data is available and statistically reliable.
"This legislation is important to home and car owners of
Insurance industry concerns
Rep.
But he said it does not address the factors that he said are the real causes of rising premiums — the rising frequency of catastrophic weather events and the proliferation of "storm chasers" who exploit those events for their own profit, at the expense of insurance companies.
"Those storm chasers are driving additional insurance claims and additional costs," he said. "We continue to see lawsuits filed for dubious reasons that continue to drive costs."
Keicher and a number of other lawmakers who work in the insurance industry abstained from voting on the bill. It passed 66-40 and will next be sent to the
"
------------
This article first appeared on Capitol News Illinois and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service funded primarily by the


EDITORIAL: Make responsible tax cuts, increases
Prosecutor conceded lack of criminal evidence in Federal Reserve investigation, transcript shows
Advisor News
- When new investment trends emerge, Gen Z is most likely generation to be first in
- Could ‘plain English’ become an advisor’s secret weapon?
- IRI urges Senate action on 403(b) parity legislation
- Three estate planning ideas to protect your clients and their wealth
- What advisors must know about accessible client documents
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
- Wink: Annuity sales post strong Q2, led by MYGAs and structured products
- Legacy Marketing Group partners with Malibu Life USA for annuity launch
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News