Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the health insurance premium tax credit. These regulations affect individuals who enroll in qualified health plans through Affordable Insurance Exchanges (Exchanges, also called Marketplaces) and claim the premium tax credit and Exchanges that make qualified health plans available to individuals.
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are effective on
Applicability Date: For applicability dates, see SUBSEC 1.36B-2(d), 1.36B-3(m), 1.36B-4(c), and 1.162(l)-1(c).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document contains final regulations that amend the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) relating to the health insurance premium tax credit and under section 162(l) of the Code relating to the deduction for health insurance costs for self-employed individuals.
On
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Provisions
1. Relief for Married Victims of Domestic Abuse or Spousal Abandonment
Section 36B provides a refundable premium tax credit to help individuals and families afford health insurance purchased through an Exchange. To be eligible for a premium tax credit under section 36B, section 36B(a) provides that an individual must be an applicable taxpayer. Section 36B(c)(1) defines an applicable taxpayer to mean a taxpayer (1) with household income for the taxable year that equals or exceeds 100 percent but does not exceed 400 percent of the federal poverty line for the taxpayer's family size, (2) who may not be claimed as a dependent by another taxpayer, and (3) who files a joint return if married (within the meaning of section 7703).
Section 1.36B-2T(b)(2)(i) provides that except as provided in
A. Eligibility Criteria
Comments were generally favorable with respect to the criteria for eligibility for relief from the married filing jointly requirement under the temporary regulations. For example, commenters agreed with the rule in the temporary regulations that victims of domestic violence are not required to contact their spouse as a condition for qualifying for relief from the married filing jointly requirement. Commenters also agreed that relief from the married filing jointly requirement should be available even if the abuse or abandonment occurs in a taxable year other than the taxable year for which a taxpayer seeks relief. A number of commenters requested clarification regarding when a taxpayer is considered a victim of spousal abandonment. The rule in
The final regulations do not provide a definition of reasonable diligence. The
In addition, the final regulations do not broaden the "unable to locate" rule to include situations in which a spouse poses a threat to the taxpayer claiming relief because the definition of domestic abuse in
B. Additional Exceptions
Several commenters requested that the
The final regulations do not expand relief from the married filing jointly requirement beyond domestic abuse and spousal abandonment. The relief finalized in these regulations is specifically tailored to address the limited and unique situations when the taxpayer is unable to file a joint return either because the taxpayer fears for his or her safety or, through no fault of the victim, can neither file a joint return because the non-filing spouse cannot be located nor obtain a divorce or legal separation because sufficient time has not lapsed under state law. In contrast, the circumstances described by the commenters do not warrant relief because the taxpayer is able to file a joint return.
Moreover, because the purposes of the innocent spouse rules and the rule in
--This is a summary of a
Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.
CFR Part: "26 CFR Part 1"
RIN Number: "RIN 1545-BM09"
Citation: "82 FR 34601"
Document Number: "TD 9822"
Federal Register Page Number: "34601"
"Rules and Regulations"



Commission declines Vero Insurance clearance to acquire Tower
Why the GOP is in a bind on health care
Advisor News
- Why timing the market is still a retirement mistake and what to do instead
- Business owners may be overlooking a key part of their financial picture
- How smart investments prepare clients for inflation
- Amid slew of corporate tax ideas, Newsom chose one likely to hit people’s premiums
- The biggest risk to your clients’ financial plans isn’t market volatility
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Best’s Special Report: U.S. Life/Annuity Industry Sees Bottom-Line Growth Despite 18% Decline in Total Income in First-Quarter 2026
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
- Fortitude Re Completes $500 Million FABN Issuance
- Reframing retirement income for greater certainty
- Jackson Introduces Dow Jones Industrial Average Index Option, Flexible Premiums, Six-Year Rate Guarantee in Latest Registered Index-Linked Annuity Launch
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Humana Awarded Statewide Illinois HealthChoice Medicaid Contract, Expanding Access to Care Across the State
- What to know: Federal cuts impact Essential Plan; cuts start July 1
- Guv wannabees: ‘It’s health care costs, stupid!’
- One year after steepest premium increase in a decade, RI health insurers seek double-digit hikes
- How much money do Connecticut residents need to retire comfortably?
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- How much money do Connecticut residents need to retire comfortably?
- Sparks Financial Announces Addition of Industry Leader Scott Theodore
- AM Best Assigns Issue Credit Rating to Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company’s New Surplus Notes
- Greg Lindberg slams ‘vindictiveness’ in fight for prison computer access
- Best’s Special Report: U.S. Life/Annuity Industry Sees Bottom-Line Growth Despite 18% Decline in Total Income in First-Quarter 2026
More Life Insurance News