Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to the health insurance premium tax credit. These regulations affect individuals who enroll in qualified health plans through Affordable Insurance Exchanges (Exchanges, also called Marketplaces) and claim the premium tax credit and Exchanges that make qualified health plans available to individuals.
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are effective on
Applicability Date: For applicability dates, see SUBSEC 1.36B-2(d), 1.36B-3(m), 1.36B-4(c), and 1.162(l)-1(c).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document contains final regulations that amend the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) relating to the health insurance premium tax credit and under section 162(l) of the Code relating to the deduction for health insurance costs for self-employed individuals.
On
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Provisions
1. Relief for Married Victims of Domestic Abuse or Spousal Abandonment
Section 36B provides a refundable premium tax credit to help individuals and families afford health insurance purchased through an Exchange. To be eligible for a premium tax credit under section 36B, section 36B(a) provides that an individual must be an applicable taxpayer. Section 36B(c)(1) defines an applicable taxpayer to mean a taxpayer (1) with household income for the taxable year that equals or exceeds 100 percent but does not exceed 400 percent of the federal poverty line for the taxpayer's family size, (2) who may not be claimed as a dependent by another taxpayer, and (3) who files a joint return if married (within the meaning of section 7703).
Section 1.36B-2T(b)(2)(i) provides that except as provided in
A. Eligibility Criteria
Comments were generally favorable with respect to the criteria for eligibility for relief from the married filing jointly requirement under the temporary regulations. For example, commenters agreed with the rule in the temporary regulations that victims of domestic violence are not required to contact their spouse as a condition for qualifying for relief from the married filing jointly requirement. Commenters also agreed that relief from the married filing jointly requirement should be available even if the abuse or abandonment occurs in a taxable year other than the taxable year for which a taxpayer seeks relief. A number of commenters requested clarification regarding when a taxpayer is considered a victim of spousal abandonment. The rule in
The final regulations do not provide a definition of reasonable diligence. The
In addition, the final regulations do not broaden the "unable to locate" rule to include situations in which a spouse poses a threat to the taxpayer claiming relief because the definition of domestic abuse in
B. Additional Exceptions
Several commenters requested that the
The final regulations do not expand relief from the married filing jointly requirement beyond domestic abuse and spousal abandonment. The relief finalized in these regulations is specifically tailored to address the limited and unique situations when the taxpayer is unable to file a joint return either because the taxpayer fears for his or her safety or, through no fault of the victim, can neither file a joint return because the non-filing spouse cannot be located nor obtain a divorce or legal separation because sufficient time has not lapsed under state law. In contrast, the circumstances described by the commenters do not warrant relief because the taxpayer is able to file a joint return.
Moreover, because the purposes of the innocent spouse rules and the rule in
--This is a summary of a
Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.
CFR Part: "26 CFR Part 1"
RIN Number: "RIN 1545-BM09"
Citation: "82 FR 34601"
Document Number: "TD 9822"
Federal Register Page Number: "34601"
"Rules and Regulations"


Commission declines Vero Insurance clearance to acquire Tower
Why the GOP is in a bind on health care
Advisor News
- Why advisors should offer retirement-longevity planning
- A hybrid approach outperforms the 4% Rule, researchers find
- The missing piece in most retirement plans
- Clients are bringing TikTok insurance advice into advisor meetings
- Embracing a family-centric approach to financial planning
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- The Manhattan Life Insurance Company Acquires Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Sammons Enterprises & Sammons Financial Group Respond to Reports
- Court losses bring Greg Lindberg fraud victims closer to restitution
- NAIFA Past President Robert M. Nelson to receive the life insurance industry’s highest honor
- Prudential Introduces Protection IUL, Expanding Its Indexed Universal Life Lineup With More Flexible Options for Today’s Customers
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of PT KB Insurance Indonesia
More Life Insurance News