Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; Revisions to the Office of Inspector General’s Exclusion Authorities
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the regulations relating to exclusion authorities under the authority of the
DATES: These regulations are effective on
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Background
The Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010)) (ACA) expanded the Secretary's authority to exclude various individuals and entities from participation in Federal health care programs under section 1128 of the Social Security Act (Act). The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) amended the Secretary's authority to waive certain exclusions under section 1128 of the Act. The Secretary's authority under section 1128 of the Act has been delegated to the
II. Legal Authority
The legal authority for this regulatory action is found in the Act, as amended by MMA and ACA. The legal authority for the proposed changes is listed by the parts of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) that we propose to modify:
1000: 42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh.
1001: 42 U.S.C. 1302; 1320a-7; 1320a-7b; 1395u(j); 1395u(k); 1395w-104(e)(6); 1395y(d); 1395y(e); 1395cc(b)(2)(D), (E), and (F); 1395hh; 1842(j)(1)(D)(iv); 1842(k)(1), and sec. 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).
1002: 42 U.S.C. 1302, 1320a-3, 1320a-5, 1320a-7, 1396(a)(4)(A), 1396a(p), 1396a(a)(39), 1396a(a)(41), and 1396b(i)(2).
1006: 42 U.S.C. 405(d), 405(e), 1302, 1320a-7, and 1320a-7a.
III. Summary of the Proposed Rule
On
Part 1000
The proposed regulation made a number of technical changes to the definitions found in section 1000.10 of the regulations. These included changes to the definitions of "Directly," "Furnished," and "Indirectly" that would more clearly incorporate newer payment methodologies into these definitions. The proposed regulation also moved numerous definitions from parts 1001 and 1003 into part 1000 to make them applicable to the entire subchapter and to consolidate the definitions in the subchapter. Lastly, it removed definitions that were specific to
Part 1001
The proposed regulation reflected the expansion of OIG's exclusion authority in MMA and ACA and also proposed numerous technical and policy changes. First, ACA expanded the permissive exclusion authority found in section 1128(b)(2) of the Act to reach all individuals and entities who were convicted for the interference with or obstruction of both investigations and audits related to the use of funds received from a Federal health care program. Next, the proposal reflected an expansion of the permissive exclusion authority found in section 1128(b)(11) of the Act. After ACA, section 1128(b)(11) of the Act provides for exclusion of any individual or entity furnishing, ordering, referring for furnishing, or certifying the need for items and services for which payment may be made under
Third, ACA added a permissive exclusion authority at section 1128(b)(16) of the Act for knowingly making or causing to be made any false statement, omission, or misrepresentation of material fact in any application, agreement, bid, or contract to participate or enroll as a provider of services or supplier under a Federal health care program. The proposed regulation corresponding to this authority, at
Lastly, in
The proposed regulation also included numerous changes that reflect OIG's policies and practices. We proposed to narrow the scope of providers excluded under sections 1128(a)(4) and (b)(3) for convictions related to controlled substances to those who were convicted for offenses that occurred during the time they were employed in the health care industry. We also proposed to update the dollar amounts in the aggravating and mitigating factors that take financial harm into account to
We also proposed to add a process for early reinstatement where a health care license has been lost and has not been reinstated, which included numerous factors that OIG would consider under such a process. We proposed to include a provision at
The proposed regulation also made numerous technical and clarifying changes. We proposed reorganizing
We also proposed revising the language requiring that individuals convicted of previous offenses be excluded for a longer minimum period to reflect the statutory language, which considers "previous" convictions instead of "other" convictions. We proposed to revise the language related to immediate access requirements to include technical clarifications and access to electronically stored documents under the Inspector General Reform Act of 2008.
Lastly, we proposed a clarification to the regulation pertaining to exclusions under section 1128(b)(15) of the Act that would state that the length of an individual's exclusion under section 1128(b)(15) of the Act is the same length as the exclusion of an excluded entity on which the individual's exclusion is based.
Part 1002
The proposed rule included several clarifying and technical changes, including clarifying
Part 1006
Consistent with ACA, the proposed regulation reflected OIG's new authority to issue testimonial subpoenas in investigations of potential cases involving the exclusions statute.
--This is a summary of a
Final rule.
CFR Part: "42 CFR Parts 1000, 1001, 1002, and 1006"
Citation: "82 FR 4100"
Federal Register Page Number: "4100"
"Rules and Regulations"


Despite losing grant, health district will help addicts with treatment
Longtime Ascension Executive Robert J. Henkel, FACHE, to Retire
Advisor News
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
- A client remarried: Does their annuity still fit?
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News