WASHINGTON, D.C.--Following the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to serve on the United States Supreme Court, Senator Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the senior member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, spoke to print, TV, and radio outlets about Judge Gorsuch's impeccable qualifications. Hatch also wrote about the criteria Senators and the American people should use in evaluating a nominee for the highest court in the land.

Hatch: Like Scalia, Gorsuch has shown steady devotion to Constitution

By Orrin Hatch

sltrib.com/opinion/4886727-155/hatch-like-scalia-gorsuch-has-shown

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump nominated Colorado federal judge Neil Gorsuch to fill the late Justice Antonin Scalia's seat on the Supreme Court. The president has made an inspired choice. Utahns should take heart that the man who will replace Scalia will be just as committed to the Constitution as his predecessor.

Time and again, Gorsuch has shown that he understands the proper role of a judge under our Constitution and believes that lawmaking authority resides with the people and their elected representatives, not unelected judges.

The composition of the Supreme Court is an issue of profound importance to Utahns, and indeed, to all Americans. The justices decide questions that affect all our lives -- from limits on federal power to the definition of fundamental societal institutions. It's essential, therefore, that justices understand their important but limited role under the Constitution. Scalia powerfully advocated and consistently followed the founders' vision in his judging. I have full confidence that Gorsuch will do the same.

Senator Orrin Hatch: Why Neil Gorsuch is the Right Choice

By Senator Orrin Hatch

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/02/03/senator-orrin-hatch-supreme-court-nominee-gorsuch-deserves-smooth-and-speedy-confirmation.html

As the intellectual architect of the effort to restore the judiciary to its proper role under the Constitution, Justice Scalia was a singularly influential jurist. To say that he leaves big shoes to fill is an understatement. Any worthy successor to Justice Scalia's legacy must not only be committed to continuing his life's work, but also capable of delivering the sort of intellectual leadership that Justice Scalia provided for decades.

Of all of the potential candidates for this vacancy, Neil Gorsuch stands out as the one best positioned to fill this role. His resume can only be described as stellar: Columbia University, Oxford, Harvard Law School, clerkships on the D.C. Circuit and Supreme Court, a distinguished career in private practice and in the Department of Justice, and more than a decade of service on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Even among his many talented colleagues on the federal bench, Judge Gorsuch's opinions consistently stand out for their clarity, thoughtfulness, and reasoning. In the words a colleague appointed by President Carter, Judge Gorsuch "writes opinions in a unique style that has more verve and vitality than any other judge I study on a regular basis." That colleague continues: "Judge Gorsuch listens well and decides justly. His dissents are instructive rather than vitriolic. In sum, I think he is an excellent judicial craftsman."

There can be no doubt that Judge Gorsuch has the credentials to be an effective member of the Supreme Court. Nevertheless, I have long held that no nominee's resume alone--no matter how sterling--should be considered sufficient to merit confirmation to the Supreme Court. Rather, we must also consider a nominee's judicial philosophy.

A good judge is not one we can depend on to produce particular policy outcomes. Rather, a good judge is one we can depend on to produce the outcomes the law and the Constitution prescribe. Neil Gorsuch is exactly that sort of judge, and deserves a smooth and speedy confirmation.

Washington Post: Volokh Conspiracy: Sen. Orrin Hatch on the Supreme Court: 'Activist Justices have rewritten our laws'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/30/sen-orrin-hatch-on-the-supreme-court-activist-justices-have-rewritten-our-laws/?utm_term=.a7d016e2fc17

Before our evaluation of the nominee begins, I wish to outline the principles that have guided me in assessing the qualifications of the last twelve Justices appointed to the Supreme Court. These same principles will guide me -- and should guide my Senate colleagues and the public as well -- in considering President Trump's nominee. They are not new principles. Indeed, they come from the Constitution itself, which the Founders of our great nation wrote and ratified nearly 230 years ago.

The Constitution establishes a government of limited powers -- one that promotes self-governance, is grounded in the rule of law, and ensures a proper separation of powers between three branches of government. Of these three branches, the judicial branch was expected to be -- in the words of Alexander Hamilton -- "the least dangerous" because it would lack power to control revenue or command the armed forces. Knowing that the Founders intended the judiciary to be limited in scope and influence helps us to better understand the type of judge who should serve on the Supreme Court.

Specifically, nominees to the Supreme Court must have a judicial philosophy of restraint and humility so that they view their role as limited to faithfully interpreting the law. It is not a Justice's role to make or change laws by imposing his own policy preferences instead of what Congress actually passed. It is not her role to prejudge issues by looking beyond the text of the law to consider her personal views and feelings. And it is not a Justice's role to choose winners and losers based on subjective beliefs that favor one group over another.

In the days and weeks ahead, advocates and interest groups will say many things about the President's nominee to the Supreme Court. They will want to know how the nominee will decide particular cases before those cases ever reach the Court to make sure the nominee is on the right team. Our nation's Founders would have been embarrassed by such questions. Instead, the questions we ask should focus on whether the nominee will interpret and apply the law faithfully and neutrally, no matter what the issue is. That is, after all, what our Constitution demands.

Orrin Hatch: The right Supreme Court Justice for America

By Orrin Hatch

For the Deseret News

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865672166/Orrin-Hatch-The-right-Supreme-Court-justice-for-America.html

Unfortunately, past presidents have frequently appointed the wrong kind of judge -- judges who do not respect the limits of their power and who interpret and apply the law according to their personal preferences. Rather than follow the law where it leads, they lead the law in the direction they want it to go.

These misguided judges often change the law by stealth, seeming to leave the words of statutes and the Constitution alone while changing their meaning. In doing so, they have expanded the power of the federal government over virtually all aspects of American life. At the same time, they have severely restricted the ability of the people and their elected representatives to decide important questions such as marriage, pornography or abortion. And by changing the meaning of the First Amendment, these judges have turned religious freedom inside out. They have even endangered these rights by restricting protections for the free exercise of religion.

This approach is wrong and dangerous not because of its results, but because of how it reaches those results. Regardless of whether any particular result produces good or bad policy, the political ends do not justify the judicial means. As Justice Scalia once said: "If you're going to be a good and faithful judge, you have to resign yourself to the fact that you're not always going to like the conclusions you reach."

Many advocates of unrestrained judges will be using misleading cliches or code words such as "mainstream." There is, however, nothing mainstream about judges who manipulate the Constitution, twist statutes or otherwise illegitimately impose their own priorities or preferences on the American people. There is nothing mainstream about judges who believe they can remake the law and the Constitution in their own image.

Justice Scalia once warned that if the Constitution's meaning is determined by judges -- rather than the people -- the selection of judges becomes a political "hot potato," a scenario in which "every time you need to appoint a new Supreme Court justice, you are going to have a mini-plebiscite on what the Constitution means." An impartial judge knows that the Constitution already has a meaning, and that is the kind of judge America needs.

Senator Hatch on Fox News Happening Now: "I don't see how Democrats can raise a legitimate issue against Gorsuch."

(Video Via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm727O0hOnE YouTube)

Senator Hatch on For the Record, with Greta Van Susteren: "I don't think they could have picked a better person to succeed Justice

(Video Via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0ZPsTfk4nw&t=2s YouTube)

Senator Hatch on America's Newsroom: "You can't find a better-qualified person for the Supreme Court than Judge Gorsuch"

(Video Via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb8OA_938mQ YouTube)

KUER Radio West: Examining SCOTUS Nominee Neil Gorsuch (from the 2:00 mark)

http://radiowest.kuer.org/post/examining-scotus-nominee-neil-gorsuch

KSL 5 News at 5: Utah Senator Orrin Hatch met with new supreme court nominee Neil Gorsuch

(Video Via https://youtu.be/WzoZFDMwHtA YouTube)

ABC 4: Good Morning Utah: While He was at the Capitol, Gorsuch met with Senator Hatch

(Video Via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6juwBokZAQ&feature=youtu.be YouTube)

2 News at 10:00pm: Senator Hatch said that Gorsuch is a standout choice

(Video Via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvNHDVDyyjs&feature=youtu.be YouTube)

Hatch Applauds Trump Pick for Supreme Court

http://www.sltrib.com/news/4886682-155/utahs-hatch-applauds-trump-pick-for?fullpage=1

Washington * Sens. Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee offered their glove-in-hand support on Tuesday for the fight to confirm President Donald Trump's pick for the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, whose rulings on religious freedom are easy talking points for conservatives eager for a court that continues a tilt in their direction.

Gorsuch, a judge on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes Utah in its jurisdiction, has favored religious organizations in various cases, siding with Pleasant Grove in a battle to keep its Ten Commandments monument and for Utah Gov. Herbert to strip Planned Parenthood of its funding.

Trump's Supreme Court nominee wrote the dissent in the Utah reproductive-rights case that in July granted the group a preliminary injunction, nullifying a move by Herbert to block $272,000 of federal funds to the agency.

"It is undisputed," Gorsuch wrote, "that the governor was free as a matter of law to suspend the funding in question for this reason," namely in response to unsubstantiated videos that purported to show the clinics illegally selling fetal tissue.

Hatch, the former chairman of and longest-serving Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Lee joined Trump at the White House for the prime-time announcement.

"With Neil Gorsuch, the president has made a standout choice," Hatch said in a prepared statement. "Judge Gorsuch is one of the brightest stars on the federal bench, displaying a caliber of intellectual leadership that is rare even among the most qualified jurists."

Hatch -- who has played a role in confirming 12 Supreme Court justices during his tenure, including all eight currently sitting on the bench -- called Trump's nomination an "inspired choice."

Even in a victory lap of a high-court nomination that follows what Hatch is looking for, the senator took a stab at "liberal judges" in an op-ed in The Salt Lake Tribune.

"As many Utahns know, entrusting liberal judges to interpret our laws could threaten our very way of life," Hatch wrote. "With no regard for the values and freedoms we hold dear, these judges could drastically weaken laws protecting the sanctity of life, Second Amendment rights and religious liberty."

Hatch said that under such a liberal court, the Constitution would be subjected to a politically charged direction by "unelected judges."

"We cannot afford to put our most fundamental freedoms at risk," Hatch wrote, "by giving liberal judges free rein to distort our Constitution

Deseret News: Utah Senator praises Supreme Court nominee

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865672296/Utah-senators-praise-Supreme-Court-nomination.html

Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch was quick to praise the nomination of Gorsuch to the Supreme Court Tuesday evening.

"With Neil Gorsuch, the president has made a standout choice," Hatch said in a news release. "Throughout his career, he has consistently demonstrated an abiding understanding of a judge's proper role: to 'say what the law is,' not what he might wish the law to be."

Hatch sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee that will hold hearings on the nomination.

Both Hatch and Lee committed to doing all they can to ensure Gorsuch is confirmed quickly by the Senate.

"If there is one man capable of filling the big shoes left by the late Justice Scalia, it is Neil Gorsuch," Hatch said. "I applaud the president's inspired choice and will do everything in my power to ensure his confirmation. As the longest-serving current member of the Judiciary Committee, I look forward to helping lead a vigorous debate about the kind of justice that America needs."

The Specrum: Hatch: Senate will confirm Gorsuch

By David Demille

http://www.thespectrum.com/story/news/2017/02/03/hatch-senate-confirm-gorsuch/97450110/

One way or another, the U.S. Senate is going to confirm President Donald Trump's first nominee for the Supreme Court, and it's going to be a good thing for Utah, Sen. Orrin Hatch said Friday.

Hatch, the longest-serving member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a telephone interview that he would find it "abhorrent" if senate Democrats follow through with threats to filibuster Neil Gorsuch's appointment, and suggested he'd back Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's suggestion that Republican leaders would make sure the appointment goes through, "one way or another."

"The president has the right to pick these nominees," Hatch said, although he stopped short of using the phrase "nuclear option" that Trump used in urging McConnell and other Senate Republicans to change the body's rules and do away with the filibuster.

The "nuclear option" refers to changing senate rules to require only a simple majority of votes to confirm nominees, instead of sticking to the agreement that 60 senators should be required to bring a vote to the senate floor. Doing so would allow the GOP to use its 52 votes to confirm Gorsuch without a single Democratic vote.

It would be a dramatic change in Senate tradition, but not completely unprecedented, Hatch noted, referencing Democratic Sen. Harry Reid's use of the option in 2013 to push through then-president Barack Obama's lower court and executive branch nominees.

Nearly a decade earlier, when Republicans controlled the Senate, McConnell, then majority whip, threatened to use the option to push through some of then-president George W. Bush's nominees, although a bipartisan group of senators reached an alternative deal before the "nuclear option" was used.

Gorsuch, a judge on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, would replace the late Antonin Scalia, who died last February. The nation's highest court has since had only eight members, with the GOP-led Senate having refused for months to hold confirmation hearings for Obama nominee Merrick Garland.

Hatch, who in the past had praised Garland and suggested he was qualified as a Supreme Court justice, joined Republican leaders in refusing to hold the hearings, saying the choice shouldn't be made so close to a presidential election.

Gorsuch would be the perfect pick to reflect Utah values, Hatch said, suggesting he was as pleased with this nomination as any he's seen come through the Senate - and Hatch has seen 12 justices confirmed in his 38-year senate tenure, including all eight active members of the bench.

Gorsuch's most high-profile opinions have fallen on the conservative side of issues close to the hearts of a majority of Utahns, Hatch said, including defenses of religious liberties and criticism of federal rules and regulations.

The 10th Circuit includes Utah in its jurisdiction, and Gorsuch sided with the city of Pleasant Grove in a 2009 case over whether the town could have a monument to the Ten Commandments on public property, and he wrote the dissenting opinion last year when the appeals court granted a preliminary injunction to stop Gov. Gary Herbert from blocking federal funds going to Planned Parenthood.

Gorsuch also sided with religious organizations in two cases raised against the Affordable Care Act, ruling that employers should not be forced to provide contraception coverage without a copay if it went against their religious views.

In case after case, Gorsuch has backed state arguments against unreasonable federal rules and regulations, Hatch said, arguing that Gorsuch would lend a needed western perspective to the court as it considers regionally-important issues like public lands regulation.

"We now have a western judge who knows what it's like to be walked-over by the federal government," Hatch said, arguing that Gorsuch has consistently followed a Scalia-like commitment to interpreting laws rather than "substituting" his own views into decisions.

Daily Herald: Trump invites Orrin Hatch to attend Supreme Court nominee announcement

By Stacy Johnson

President Donald Trump will announce his pick for nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday evening, and Utah's Sen. Orrin Hatch will be in attendance.

According to Hatch's office, he was invited by Trump to attend the president's announcement.

"Last week, Senator Hatch met with the President in the Oval Office for more than an hour to engage in a wide-ranging conversation on policy issues that included, among other things, a discussion of the President's choices for the Supreme Court," said Hatch's office.

The announcement is expected at 5 p.m. Mountain Time at The White House.

Hatch Praises Supreme Court Nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch

By Utah Policy

http://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/today-at-utah-policy/12211-hatch-praises-supreme-court-nomination-of-judge-neil-gorsuch

Senator Orrin G. Hatch, the senior member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement on the President's nomination of Judge Neil M. Gorsuch of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to serve as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States:

"With Neil Gorsuch, the President has made a standout choice. Judge Gorsuch is one of the brightest stars on the federal bench, displaying a caliber of intellectual leadership that is rare even among the most qualified jurists. Throughout his career, he has consistently demonstrated an abiding understanding of a judge's proper role: to 'say what the law is,' not what he might wish the law to be. If there is one man capable of filling the big shoes left by the late Justice Scalia, it is Neil Gorsuch. I applaud the President's inspired choice and will do everything in my power to ensure his confirmation. As the longest-serving current member of the Judiciary Committee, I look forward to helping lead a vigorous debate about the kind of justice that America needs."

Senator Hatch has played a role in the confirmation of twelve Supreme Court justices, including all eight current members of the Court.

Washington Free Beacon: Hatch Praises Judge Gorsuch's Nomination to Supreme Court

By Jack Heretik

http://freebeacon.com/politics/hatch-praises-judge-gorsuchs-nomination-supreme-court/

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R., Utah) praised President Donald Trump's nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court on Tuesday night.

"With Neil Gorsuch, the president has made a standout choice," Hatch said. "Judge Gorsuch is one of the brightest stars on the federal bench, displaying a caliber of intellectual leadership that is rare even among the most qualified jurists."

"If there is one man capable of filling the big shoes left by the late Justice Scalia, it is Neil Gorsuch," Hatch continued.

Hatch went on to say that he would do whatever he could to advance Gorsuch's nomination to confirmation.

h is the president pro tempore of the Senate and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Gorsuch serves on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Press Release: Hatch Praises Supreme Court Nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch

WASHINGTON, DC--Senator Orrin G. Hatch, the senior member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement on the President's nomination of Judge Neil M. Gorsuch of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to serve as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States:

Video Via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPuUj3CKweY&feature=youtu.be YouTube

"With Neil Gorsuch, the President has made a standout choice. Judge Gorsuch is one of the brightest stars on the federal bench, displaying a caliber of intellectual leadership that is rare even among the most qualified jurists. Throughout his career, he has consistently demonstrated an abiding understanding of a judge's proper role: to 'say what the law is,' not what he might wish the law to be. If there is one man capable of filling the big shoes left by the late Justice Scalia, it is Neil Gorsuch. I applaud the President's inspired choice and will do everything in my power to ensure his confirmation. As the longest-serving current member of the Judiciary Committee, I look forward to helping lead a vigorous debate about the kind of justice that America needs."

Senator Hatch has played a role in the confirmation of twelve Supreme Court justices, including all eight current members of the Court

Release: VIDEO: Hatch Meets with Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch

Washington, D.C.--This afternoon, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT), the senior member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, met with Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court.

Last night, Senator Hatch attended President Trump's announcement at the White House and praised Judge Gorsuch on video. He also met with the President in the Oval Office last week for more than an hour to engage in a wide-ranging conversation on policy issues that included, among other things, a discussion of the President's choices for the Supreme Court. You can find out more about Senator Hatch's White House visit by watching this video. Senator Hatch also wrote an op-ed about Judge Gorsuch's qualifications in the Salt Lake Tribune.

Read this original document at: http://www.hatch.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/releases?ID=228946F7-E949-4916-8032-882D8E568B7D

September is Life Insurance Awareness Month, making it an opportune time to revisit clients’ existing life insurance strategies. Clients without adequate coverage typically fall into one of two camps: those with no life insurance at all, and those whose coverage no longer meets their current needs.

A simple question I ask my clients is this: If you retired today, using only the assets you currently have, would it be enough to maintain your family's lifestyle? For some families, the honest answer is no, and that is often a helpful way to illustrate what life insurance is intended to protect against: a family's ability to maintain its footing if an income stream were to stop unexpectedly.

When coverage quietly lapses

When I think through why clients lose track of a term policy's expiration date, it may come down to a gap in communication. If an advisor isn't conducting regular reviews, there's often no other prompt in place to reevaluate coverage. Carrier practices vary, too; whereas some send an annual statement, others simply send a bill, and it isn't always obvious to a client when a policy was issued or when it's set to expire.

In another instance, clients may buy a 20-year term policy assuming they won't need coverage once it's up, then the 20 years pass, and it turns out they still need it. Since they didn't address it proactively, they're now buying new coverage at significantly higher rates, hoping their health cooperates. Health and insurability often change over time, and this can affect coverage availability and cost.

The importance of periodic coverage reviews

Having an annual review with clients is one of the simplest ways to prevent a policy from lapsing unnoticed. My team flags any client whose term policy is set to expire in the coming year, giving us a full year of runway to reevaluate coverage. From there, the decision to obtain a new policy to extend the coverage five,10 or 15 years, convert the coverage to a permanent policy, or let it lapse intentionally comes down to a minimum needs analysis. That means sitting down and figuring out what it actually costs to run the client's life - the mortgage, property taxes, the kids' activities, the cell phone bill, all of it - since those expenses don't disappear if an income-earning spouse passes.

We then factor in outstanding debt, whether a surviving spouse would want the mortgage paid off outright, and any balances, like credit cards, that shouldn't be left behind. If there are children, we also run a college funding analysis, comparing what tuition will cost against what's already saved, to get a present value of the shortfall.

Life events are inevitable and they impact coverage needs

Certain life events also merit a deeper client conversation even when a policy hasn't technically expired, including the birth of a child, a home purchase, new debt or stepping into a caregiving role for a family member. Each of these may tip the scale on that minimum needs analysis, making it a natural point to run the numbers again.

When a client's net worth or health picture changes, they might consider converting from term to permanent insurance. Many term policies allow a client to convert some or all of the coverage to a permanent policy, at any point before the term ends, without new medical underwriting. Conversion terms and deadlines vary by carrier, so it's worth confirming a client's specific provisions as part of any review.

If a client converts to permanent coverage, it's also important to discuss long-term care riders. A long-term care rider may help provide flexibility when planning for potential long-term care expenses. Whether it's the right fit for a given client depends on family longevity, cash flow and the specifics of their policy.

It doesn’t have to be too late

Even later in life or with a complicated health history, coverage options may still be available, depending on individual health circumstances and carrier underwriting requirements. In one recent case, a client whose term coverage had expired explored replacement options despite certain health considerations and reviewed alternatives with multiple carriers. Some health history complicated things, but because we shopped across several carriers, he still found a workable option.

With it being Life Insurance Awareness Month, checking in on your clients’ coverage can be as simple as picking up the phone and asking what has changed since your last talk. Our value as advisors often lies in keeping an open line of communication year after year, so any coverage gaps can be assessed early on. That kind of ongoing relationship and client-focused approach keeps a client's protection matched to the life they live today.

© Entire contents copyright 2026 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.