Floyd County approves mediation proposal with law enforcement center and courthouse update architect
Prochaska's architectural design fee, according to its contract with the county, is for 10% of the construction costs. Because the project ended up costing about
The county argues that the project is costing much more than originally estimated because of Prochaska's "professional negligence," including many change orders over the course of the project to fix what the county says were design errors.
The county asked that a jury not only decide the additional
Prochaska filed counterclaims, including asking that the county be ordered to pay the additional
The action was set for a jury trial to begin
The mediation agreement includes the county paying Prochaska
If agreed to and signed by both sides, the release would not prevent future action by the county for any claims regarding Prochaska's work that are discovered after the date of the mediation agreement, and Prochaska would still have the right to try to collect more than
As of Friday afternoon, Prochaska had not indicated to the county whether it would accept the mediation proposal.
The
It was one of the last official acts by the three retiring board members, whose terms of office are officially over at the end of the day
When asked if they felt some urgency to get the matter resolved before three new supervisors take office next week, Supervisor
"We've been involved in this since day one," she said. "To put a new board of supervisors in it would have dragged out more, because you would have to get all the new board up to speed."
Originally filed by the county in
"Further, there have been over 30 change orders to date due to items defendant omitted from the original plans and specifications for the project used for bidding the project," the county alleged. There have been additional change orders since the original suit was filed.
Because Prochaska is an out-of-state company, the architectural firm was successful in having the case transferred to
The original construction cost estimate that Prochaska had provided in early 2018 and that was used to determine the amount of general obligation bonds that would have to be sold to finance the construction and other costs, was about
When Prochaska had finished its actual design of the project, its estimated cost had climbed to
Prochaska then reviewed the design to make changes to cut costs, including a much smaller atrium between the courthouse and the new
The project was put out for bid in
The county made some more changes to the project by either eliminating or delaying some items,
The final construction cost estimate was just over
In August this year, Prochaska filed a motion for summary judgment in the lawsuit and counterclaims, asking
The county then filed its own motion for summary judgment, asking the court to declare that the county does not owe Prochaska the additional fees.
On
County Auditor said the county had been requesting mediation since last summer, but Prochaska only agreed to mediation after the judge's ruling on the summary judgment motions was issued
As part of his decision,
The county had argued that even though it had agreed to continue the projects at the higher price, Prochaska's fee should still be bound by the original cost estimate.
But
"With this record, a reasonable jury could find that plaintiff never provided written approval to increase the construction budget figure past
Because of that, he wrote, "a reasonable jury could find that (Prochaska) breached its promise to (the county) to design a project that could be built for less than
The total cost of the project with architectural fees and other costs such as the cost to purchase needed land, stands at more than
CORRECTING and REPLACING Former Apple CEO John Sculley Bets on eternalHealth, a Medicare Health Plan in Boston, and Joins as the Chairman of the Board [Business Wire India]
County commissioners to meet Tuesday morning
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News