Financial Responsibility for Motor Carriers, Freight Forwarders, and Brokers
SUMMARY: FMCSA withdraws its
DATES: As of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ANPRM
On
FOOTNOTE 1 FMCSA's regulations (49 CFR part 387 Subparts A and B) require certain property and passenger motor carriers to maintain financial responsibility at the statutory minimums set forth in 49 U.S.C. 31138 and 31139. END FOOTNOTE
FOOTNOTE 2 While FMCSA is withdrawing this ANPRM, the Agency continues its implementation of MAP-21 Section 32918 in a separate docket (FMCSA-2016-0102). On
Regarding the core ANPRM issue of motor carrier financial responsibility limits, FMCSA sought public comment on whether to exercise its discretion to increase the minimum levels, and, if so, to what levels. Specifically, in the effort to gather relevant data, FMCSA posed a series of questions addressing the following matters:
* Premium Rates.
* Current Minimum Levels of Financial Responsibility.
* Impacts of Increasing the Minimum Level of Financial Responsibility.
* Compensation.
* Sources of Information.
* Timelines for implementation.
Discussion of Comments
The Agency received 2,181 public comments in response to the ANPRM. Various stakeholders commented, including representatives of motor carriers, insurance companies, broker/freight forwarders, safety advocates, attorneys, drivers, and many others. Approximately 120 submissions, including one submission reflecting a petition signed by 11,366 individuals, expressed general support for increasing the minimum levels of financial responsibility for motor carriers without providing a substantive rationale for their opinion. Approximately 145 submissions expressed general opposition to increasing the minimum levels of financial responsibility for motor carriers without providing a substantive rationale for their opinions. The Agency appreciates the level of interest shown in the ANPRM and the efforts that stakeholders made to provide responsive information.
FMCSA Decision
After considering whether to move forward with this rulemaking, the Agency has decided to withdraw the
Despite receiving a significant number of comments in response to the ANPRM, commenters did not provide responsive information necessary to allow the Agency to proceed to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. /3/ In particular, commenters did not provide sufficient cost or benefit data and the Agency was unable to otherwise obtain sufficient data on industry practice with respect to the level of liability limits in excess of the Agency's minimum financial responsibility requirements, the cost of such premiums and the frequency of, and the amount by which bodily injury and property damage claims exceed policy liability limits. The anecdotal and hypothetical data provided by commenters are not sufficient to allow the Agency to perform a systematic cost-benefit analysis that would be required to raise motor carrier minimum financial responsibility through a rulemaking. That is, based on the information provided, FMCSA is not able to determine (1) potential increases in insurance premiums associated with increased financial responsibility limits, or (2) or the impact of an increase in minimum financial responsibility requirements on insurance company capital requirements set by insurance regulators to ensure there are sufficient reserves to minimize the risk of insolvency and protect consumers. Moreover, FMCSA is not able to calculate economic benefits from having more financial resources available to assist crash victims associated with increased minimum financial responsibility limits.
FOOTNOTE 3 In a
Issued under the authority of delegation in 49 CFR 1.87 on:
Deputy Administrator.
Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.
CFR Part: "49 CFR Part 387"
RIN Number: "RIN 2126-AB74"
Citation: "82 FR 25753"
Document Number: "Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0211"
Federal Register Page Number: "25753"
"Proposed Rules"


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, Liquidator, or…
40% CAGR Expected for Reinsurance Market in China During 2013-2018
Advisor News
- How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
- Investors aren’t waiting out uncertainty
- Transamerica and Advo(k)ate Advisors launch pooled employer plan
- ‘I wish I’d met him sooner:’ Karlan Tucker remembered for integrity, faith
- Why women must be more engaged in investing
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
- Lumos Insurance introduces the Immediate Care Plan to help families fund long-term care
- NAIC regulators begin consensus phase on annuity illustration overhaul
- AM Best Revises Outlooks to Negative for Subsidiaries of Group 1001 Insurance Holdings, LLC
- Market-value adjusted annuities: Key considerations for advisors
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- New York state made $21.6M in improper Medicaid payments
- Enough of the blame game
- Why Hybrid Healthcare Is a Business Imperative for Employers in Colorado
- Abbott seeks leaner, cheaper health plans
- AGD SUPPORTS TWO FEDERAL BILLS TO STRENGTHEN DENTAL COVERAGE
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Don't keep checks with clerical errors
- The insurance distributor that builds its own software will win the next decade
- iA Financial Group Reports Second Quarter Results
- Supporting small businesses starts with smarter benefits conversations
- Judge again tosses Penn Mutual whole life lawsuit alleging tax scam
More Life Insurance News